BZZUF
Price
$58.56
Change
+$3.03 (+5.46%)
Updated
Sep 22 closing price
Capitalization
10.06B
HCMLY
Price
$16.89
Change
+$0.26 (+1.56%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
46.36B
26 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

BZZUF vs HCMLY

Header iconBZZUF vs HCMLY Comparison
Open Charts BZZUF vs HCMLYBanner chart's image
Buzzi SpA
Price$58.56
Change+$3.03 (+5.46%)
Volume$376
Capitalization10.06B
HOLCIM
Price$16.89
Change+$0.26 (+1.56%)
Volume$164.32K
Capitalization46.36B
BZZUF vs HCMLY Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BZZUF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HCMLY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BZZUF vs. HCMLY commentary
Sep 28, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BZZUF is a Hold and HCMLY is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 28, 2025
Stock price -- (BZZUF: $58.56 vs. HCMLY: $16.89)
Brand notoriety: BZZUF and HCMLY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Construction Materials industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BZZUF: 14% vs. HCMLY: 85%
Market capitalization -- BZZUF: $10.06B vs. HCMLY: $46.36B
BZZUF [@Construction Materials] is valued at $10.06B. HCMLY’s [@Construction Materials] market capitalization is $46.36B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Construction Materials] industry ranges from $76.25B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Construction Materials] industry is $9.85B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BZZUF’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileHCMLY’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • BZZUF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • HCMLY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, BZZUF is a better buy in the long-term than HCMLY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BZZUF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HCMLY’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BZZUF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • HCMLY’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BZZUF is a better buy in the short-term than HCMLY.

Price Growth

BZZUF (@Construction Materials) experienced а +5.45% price change this week, while HCMLY (@Construction Materials) price change was -2.65% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Construction Materials industry was -0.60%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.50%, and the average quarterly price growth was +17.55%.

Reported Earning Dates

HCMLY is expected to report earnings on Oct 24, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Construction Materials (-0.60% weekly)

Many naturally occurring substances, such as clay, rocks, sand, and wood, even twigs and leaves have been used in construction material. Many man-made products are also in use. Vulcan Materials Co., Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. and Owens Corning Inc. are examples of construction material companies in the U.S. Performance of companies that extract or produce construction materials could at times depend on demand for residential and commercial buildings/real estate, and therefore in some cases could feel impacted by economic cycles.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HCMLY($46.4B) has a higher market cap than BZZUF($10.1B). HCMLY has higher P/E ratio than BZZUF: HCMLY (11.82) vs BZZUF (9.99). BZZUF YTD gains are higher at: 61.540 vs. HCMLY (50.681). HCMLY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 6.95B vs. BZZUF (1.46B). HCMLY has more cash in the bank: 4.24B vs. BZZUF (1.28B). HCMLY has higher revenues than BZZUF: HCMLY (26.2B) vs BZZUF (4.45B).
BZZUFHCMLYBZZUF / HCMLY
Capitalization10.1B46.4B22%
EBITDA1.46B6.95B21%
Gain YTD61.54050.681121%
P/E Ratio9.9911.8284%
Revenue4.45B26.2B17%
Total Cash1.28B4.24B30%
Total Debt602MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BZZUF vs HCMLY: Fundamental Ratings
BZZUF
HCMLY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
15
Undervalued
9
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
133
SMR RATING
1..100
5044
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4444
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1779
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5075

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

HCMLY's Valuation (9) in the null industry is in the same range as BZZUF (15). This means that HCMLY’s stock grew similarly to BZZUF’s over the last 12 months.

HCMLY's Profit vs Risk Rating (3) in the null industry is in the same range as BZZUF (13). This means that HCMLY’s stock grew similarly to BZZUF’s over the last 12 months.

HCMLY's SMR Rating (44) in the null industry is in the same range as BZZUF (50). This means that HCMLY’s stock grew similarly to BZZUF’s over the last 12 months.

HCMLY's Price Growth Rating (44) in the null industry is in the same range as BZZUF (44). This means that HCMLY’s stock grew similarly to BZZUF’s over the last 12 months.

BZZUF's P/E Growth Rating (17) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HCMLY (79). This means that BZZUF’s stock grew somewhat faster than HCMLY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BZZUFHCMLY
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
54%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
33%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
46%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
47%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
54%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
46%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
47%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
44%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
66%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
52%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
47%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
50%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BZZUF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HCMLY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
LOAR79.021.35
+1.74%
Loar Holdings
NBHC39.470.18
+0.46%
NATIONAL BANK HOLDINGS Corp
DBE19.590.07
+0.33%
Invesco DB Energy
HYAC11.39N/A
N/A
Haymaker Acquisition Corp
HOOX132.25-2.01
-1.50%
Defiance Daily Target 2X Long HOOD ETF

BZZUF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BZZUF and THYCY have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BZZUF and THYCY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BZZUF
1D Price
Change %
BZZUF100%
N/A
THYCY - BZZUF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HCMLY - BZZUF
22%
Poorly correlated
+1.56%
BZZUY - BZZUF
12%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CARCY - BZZUF
9%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LOMA - BZZUF
5%
Poorly correlated
-1.42%
More

HCMLY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HCMLY has been closely correlated with HDLMY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 67% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HCMLY jumps, then HDLMY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HCMLY
1D Price
Change %
HCMLY100%
+1.56%
HDLMY - HCMLY
67%
Closely correlated
+1.86%
HCMLF - HCMLY
31%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BZZUY - HCMLY
28%
Poorly correlated
N/A
WBRBY - HCMLY
26%
Poorly correlated
-4.16%
CRH - HCMLY
25%
Poorly correlated
+1.69%
More