BZZUF
Price
$52.09
Change
+$2.09 (+4.18%)
Updated
Jun 5 closing price
Capitalization
7.28B
CARCY
Price
$6.01
Change
-$0.10 (-1.64%)
Updated
May 14 closing price
Capitalization
3.03B
Interact to see
Advertisement

BZZUF vs CARCY

Header iconBZZUF vs CARCY Comparison
Open Charts BZZUF vs CARCYBanner chart's image
Buzzi SpA
Price$52.09
Change+$2.09 (+4.18%)
Volume$332
Capitalization7.28B
China Resources Building Materials Technology Holdings
Price$6.01
Change-$0.10 (-1.64%)
Volume$200
Capitalization3.03B
BZZUF vs CARCY Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BZZUF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CARCY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BZZUF vs. CARCY commentary
Jul 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BZZUF is a Buy and CARCY is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 06, 2025
Stock price -- (BZZUF: $52.09 vs. CARCY: $5.97)
Brand notoriety: BZZUF and CARCY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Construction Materials industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BZZUF: 66% vs. CARCY: 97%
Market capitalization -- BZZUF: $7.28B vs. CARCY: $3.03B
BZZUF [@Construction Materials] is valued at $7.28B. CARCY’s [@Construction Materials] market capitalization is $3.03B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Construction Materials] industry ranges from $59.37B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Construction Materials] industry is $8.92B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BZZUF’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileCARCY’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • BZZUF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • CARCY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, BZZUF is a better buy in the long-term than CARCY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BZZUF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CARCY’s TA Score has 1 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BZZUF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • CARCY’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 1 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BZZUF is a better buy in the short-term than CARCY.

Price Growth

BZZUF (@Construction Materials) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while CARCY (@Construction Materials) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Construction Materials industry was +2.75%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.00%, and the average quarterly price growth was +12.20%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Construction Materials (+2.75% weekly)

Many naturally occurring substances, such as clay, rocks, sand, and wood, even twigs and leaves have been used in construction material. Many man-made products are also in use. Vulcan Materials Co., Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. and Owens Corning Inc. are examples of construction material companies in the U.S. Performance of companies that extract or produce construction materials could at times depend on demand for residential and commercial buildings/real estate, and therefore in some cases could feel impacted by economic cycles.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BZZUF($7.28B) has a higher market cap than CARCY($3.03B). CARCY has higher P/E ratio than BZZUF: CARCY (11.26) vs BZZUF (8.53). BZZUF YTD gains are higher at: 43.701 vs. CARCY (2.701). CARCY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 5.17B vs. BZZUF (1.34B). CARCY has higher revenues than BZZUF: CARCY (32.2B) vs BZZUF (4.27B).
BZZUFCARCYBZZUF / CARCY
Capitalization7.28B3.03B240%
EBITDA1.34B5.17B26%
Gain YTD43.7012.7011,618%
P/E Ratio8.5311.2676%
Revenue4.27B32.2B13%
Total Cash943MN/A-
Total Debt791MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BZZUF vs CARCY: Fundamental Ratings
BZZUF
CARCY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
14
Undervalued
13
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
15100
SMR RATING
1..100
4985
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4457
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
263
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5036

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CARCY's Valuation (13) in the null industry is in the same range as BZZUF (14). This means that CARCY’s stock grew similarly to BZZUF’s over the last 12 months.

BZZUF's Profit vs Risk Rating (15) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for CARCY (100). This means that BZZUF’s stock grew significantly faster than CARCY’s over the last 12 months.

BZZUF's SMR Rating (49) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CARCY (85). This means that BZZUF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CARCY’s over the last 12 months.

BZZUF's Price Growth Rating (44) in the null industry is in the same range as CARCY (57). This means that BZZUF’s stock grew similarly to CARCY’s over the last 12 months.

CARCY's P/E Growth Rating (3) in the null industry is in the same range as BZZUF (26). This means that CARCY’s stock grew similarly to BZZUF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BZZUFCARCY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
29%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
59%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
38%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
28%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
47%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
40%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
45%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
42%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
60%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BZZUF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CARCY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
NFLY18.730.22
+1.19%
YieldMax NFLX Option Income Strategy ETF
SPMO112.511.15
+1.03%
Invesco S&P 500® Momentum ETF
SEIV36.410.22
+0.61%
SEI Enhanced US Large Cap Value Fac ETF
RZB24.780.01
+0.04%
Reinsurance Group of America
XHYC37.19N/A
N/A
BondBloxx US HY Cnsmr Cyclcls Sctr ETF

BZZUF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BZZUF and THYCY have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BZZUF and THYCY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BZZUF
1D Price
Change %
BZZUF100%
N/A
THYCY - BZZUF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HCMLY - BZZUF
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.08%
BZZUY - BZZUF
12%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CARCY - BZZUF
9%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LOMA - BZZUF
5%
Poorly correlated
+1.07%
More

CARCY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CARCY and AHCHF have been poorly correlated (+17% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CARCY and AHCHF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CARCY
1D Price
Change %
CARCY100%
N/A
AHCHF - CARCY
17%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TGLS - CARCY
12%
Poorly correlated
+2.00%
BZZUF - CARCY
9%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AHCHY - CARCY
8%
Poorly correlated
+0.75%
RETO - CARCY
6%
Poorly correlated
+7.18%
More