BZTAF
Price
$10.46
Change
+$0.43 (+4.29%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
619.41M
RTMAF
Price
$1.48
Change
-$0.02 (-1.33%)
Updated
Aug 8 closing price
Capitalization
75.4M
Interact to see
Advertisement

BZTAF vs RTMAF

Header iconBZTAF vs RTMAF Comparison
Open Charts BZTAF vs RTMAFBanner chart's image
Boozt AB
Price$10.46
Change+$0.43 (+4.29%)
Volume$4K
Capitalization619.41M
Reitmans (Canada)
Price$1.48
Change-$0.02 (-1.33%)
Volume$1.9K
Capitalization75.4M
BZTAF vs RTMAF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
RTMAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BZTAF vs. RTMAF commentary
Aug 12, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BZTAF is a Hold and RTMAF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 12, 2025
Stock price -- (BZTAF: $10.46 vs. RTMAF: $1.48)
Brand notoriety: BZTAF and RTMAF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Apparel/Footwear Retail industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BZTAF: 100% vs. RTMAF: 125%
Market capitalization -- BZTAF: $619.41M vs. RTMAF: $75.4M
BZTAF [@Apparel/Footwear Retail] is valued at $619.41M. RTMAF’s [@Apparel/Footwear Retail] market capitalization is $75.4M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Apparel/Footwear Retail] industry ranges from $155.61B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Apparel/Footwear Retail] industry is $14.49B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BZTAF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileRTMAF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BZTAF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • RTMAF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both BZTAF and RTMAF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

RTMAF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • RTMAF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 3 bearish.

Price Growth

BZTAF (@Apparel/Footwear Retail) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while RTMAF (@Apparel/Footwear Retail) price change was -1.33% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Apparel/Footwear Retail industry was -1.82%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.90%, and the average quarterly price growth was -5.06%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Apparel/Footwear Retail (-1.82% weekly)

Companies in the apparel and/or footwear retail industry sell clothing, accessories and footwear, for different age groups and genders. The industry’s product categories could range from basics, such as underwear, to luxury items. Some retailers source items from wholesalers or an apparel brand to sell in their stores; some others are licensed to make and market their own retail goods under particular brands. Several companies outsource production of clothing to developing/emerging economies where labor costs are relatively inexpensive. Apparel retail is often influenced by fashion trends, and many companies feel the need to adapt to what’s “in vogue” to retain customers and attract new ones. A major disruption in this industry has been the burgeoning trend in digital shopping – to compete with rapidly growing e-commerce, even traditional retail players are upping the ante on their online platforms. Much of the products’ performance in apparel/footwear retail is cyclical, i.e., economic boom times encourage consumer spending, while recessions induce thriftiness among people. Some large-cap U.S. apparel/footwear retail companies include TJX Companies Inc., Ross Stores, Inc., Lululemon Athletica Inc. and Burlington Stores, Inc.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BZTAF($619M) has a higher market cap than RTMAF($75.4M). BZTAF has higher P/E ratio than RTMAF: BZTAF (32.71) vs RTMAF (29.05). BZTAF YTD gains are higher at: 0.000 vs. RTMAF (-9.866). BZTAF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 758M vs. RTMAF (68.6M). BZTAF has more cash in the bank: 391M vs. RTMAF (85.4M). RTMAF has less debt than BZTAF: RTMAF (153M) vs BZTAF (865M). BZTAF has higher revenues than RTMAF: BZTAF (8.28B) vs RTMAF (767M).
BZTAFRTMAFBZTAF / RTMAF
Capitalization619M75.4M821%
EBITDA758M68.6M1,105%
Gain YTD0.000-9.866-
P/E Ratio32.7129.05113%
Revenue8.28B767M1,080%
Total Cash391M85.4M458%
Total Debt865M153M565%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
RTMAF: Fundamental Ratings
RTMAF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
70
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
58
SMR RATING
1..100
90
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
56
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BZTAFRTMAF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
48%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
62%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
42%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
63%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
13%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
51%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
13%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
60%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
72%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
RTMAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AIGOX36.190.31
+0.86%
Alger Growth & Income I-2
JDESX47.000.39
+0.84%
JPMorgan US Research Enhanced Equity I
LGCOX19.440.08
+0.41%
Lord Abbett Global Equity F3
CIMDX15.870.06
+0.38%
Clarkston Founders Institutional
FMCDX43.03-0.04
-0.09%
Fidelity Advisor Stock Selec Mid Cp A

BZTAF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BZTAF and XTEPY have been poorly correlated (+3% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BZTAF and XTEPY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BZTAF
1D Price
Change %
BZTAF100%
N/A
XTEPY - BZTAF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RTMAF - BZTAF
3%
Poorly correlated
-1.33%
MRPZF - BZTAF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NXGPF - BZTAF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RTMNF - BZTAF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

RTMAF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that RTMAF and XTEPY have been poorly correlated (+6% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that RTMAF and XTEPY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RTMAF
1D Price
Change %
RTMAF100%
-1.33%
XTEPY - RTMAF
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RTMNF - RTMAF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BZTAF - RTMAF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AMKYF - RTMAF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NXGPF - RTMAF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More