BZQIY
Price
$7.35
Change
+$0.77 (+11.70%)
Updated
May 27 closing price
Capitalization
3.63B
31 days until earnings call
CPROF
Price
$1.21
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
May 28 closing price
Capitalization
714.84K
Interact to see
Advertisement

BZQIY vs CPROF

Header iconBZQIY vs CPROF Comparison
Open Charts BZQIY vs CPROFBanner chart's image
Bezeq The Israel Telecommunication
Price$7.35
Change+$0.77 (+11.70%)
Volume$218
Capitalization3.63B
Cortelco Systems Puerto Ri
Price$1.21
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$3.81K
Capitalization714.84K
BZQIY vs CPROF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BZQIY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CPROF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BZQIY vs. CPROF commentary
Jul 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BZQIY is a Hold and CPROF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 06, 2025
Stock price -- (BZQIY: $7.35 vs. CPROF: $1.21)
Brand notoriety: BZQIY and CPROF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Wireless Telecommunications industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BZQIY: 129% vs. CPROF: 171%
Market capitalization -- BZQIY: $3.63B vs. CPROF: $714.84K
BZQIY [@Wireless Telecommunications] is valued at $3.63B. CPROF’s [@Wireless Telecommunications] market capitalization is $714.84K. The market cap for tickers in the [@Wireless Telecommunications] industry ranges from $12.88T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Wireless Telecommunications] industry is $17.77B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BZQIY’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileCPROF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BZQIY’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • CPROF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, BZQIY is a better buy in the long-term than CPROF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BZQIY’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CPROF’s TA Score has 1 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BZQIY’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 1 bearish.
  • CPROF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 0 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BZQIY is a better buy in the short-term than CPROF.

Price Growth

BZQIY (@Wireless Telecommunications) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while CPROF (@Wireless Telecommunications) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Wireless Telecommunications industry was +1.70%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.19%, and the average quarterly price growth was +38.57%.

Reported Earning Dates

BZQIY is expected to report earnings on Aug 06, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Wireless Telecommunications (+1.70% weekly)

Wireless Telecom includes companies that sell wireless antenna or satellite-based communication services. This is the fastest-growing area in communications, as more and more communication and computing happen on mobile devices and cloud-based platforms. Wireless telecom is a key industry for global connectivity, and has even further room for growth in emerging markets and in rural parts of developed nations. People’s growing need for speed in data connectivity, higher resolution, and smoother video streaming and multimedia applications should drive growth and competition within this segment. T-Mobile US, Inc., Vodafone Group, and Sprint Corporation are some major providers of wireless telecom.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BZQIY($3.63B) has a higher market cap than CPROF($715K). BZQIY YTD gains are higher at: 7.793 vs. CPROF (0.000).
BZQIYCPROFBZQIY / CPROF
Capitalization3.63B715K507,972%
EBITDA3.5BN/A-
Gain YTD7.7930.000-
P/E Ratio11.35N/A-
Revenue9.08BN/A-
Total Cash2.41BN/A-
Total Debt9.58BN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BZQIY vs CPROF: Fundamental Ratings
BZQIY
CPROF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
25
Undervalued
5
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
47100
SMR RATING
1..100
23100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4956
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
19100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a65

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CPROF's Valuation (5) in the null industry is in the same range as BZQIY (25). This means that CPROF’s stock grew similarly to BZQIY’s over the last 12 months.

BZQIY's Profit vs Risk Rating (47) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CPROF (100). This means that BZQIY’s stock grew somewhat faster than CPROF’s over the last 12 months.

BZQIY's SMR Rating (23) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for CPROF (100). This means that BZQIY’s stock grew significantly faster than CPROF’s over the last 12 months.

BZQIY's Price Growth Rating (49) in the null industry is in the same range as CPROF (56). This means that BZQIY’s stock grew similarly to CPROF’s over the last 12 months.

BZQIY's P/E Growth Rating (19) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for CPROF (100). This means that BZQIY’s stock grew significantly faster than CPROF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BZQIYCPROF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
20%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
63%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
40%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
47%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
26%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
48%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
27%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
48%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BZQIY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CPROF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
WNEB9.970.31
+3.21%
Western New England Bancorp
DOCN29.200.80
+2.82%
DigitalOcean Holdings
ZBH93.670.17
+0.18%
Zimmer Biomet Holdings
SEAT1.86-0.02
-1.06%
Vivid Seats
RMCO1.59-0.07
-4.22%
Royalty Management Holding Corp

BZQIY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BZQIY and CVHSY have been poorly correlated (+9% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BZQIY and CVHSY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BZQIY
1D Price
Change %
BZQIY100%
N/A
CVHSY - BZQIY
9%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BGAOY - BZQIY
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CGEAF - BZQIY
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CLCMF - BZQIY
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CPROF - BZQIY
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

CPROF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CPROF has been loosely correlated with ATEX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 48% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CPROF jumps, then ATEX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CPROF
1D Price
Change %
CPROF100%
N/A
ATEX - CPROF
48%
Loosely correlated
+0.60%
IQST - CPROF
31%
Poorly correlated
-1.93%
BZQIF - CPROF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BZQIY - CPROF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CVHSY - CPROF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More