BZQIY
Price
$10.80
Change
+$1.43 (+15.26%)
Updated
Dec 3 closing price
Capitalization
5.64B
105 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
CPROF
Price
Loading...
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Loading...
Capitalization
714.84K
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

BZQIY vs CPROF

Header iconBZQIY vs CPROF Comparison
Open Charts BZQIY vs CPROFBanner chart's image
Bezeq The Israel Telecommunication
Price$10.80
Change+$1.43 (+15.26%)
Volume$434
Capitalization5.64B
Cortelco Systems Puerto Ri
PriceLoading...
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$3.81K
Capitalization714.84K
BZQIY vs CPROF Comparison Chart in %
BZQIY
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
CPROF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BZQIY vs. CPROF commentary
Dec 05, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BZQIY is a Buy and CPROF is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 05, 2025
Stock price -- (BZQIY: $10.80 vs. CPROF: $1.01)
Brand notoriety: BZQIY and CPROF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Major Telecommunications industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BZQIY: 142% vs. CPROF: 100%
Market capitalization -- BZQIY: $5.64B vs. CPROF: $714.84K
BZQIY [@Major Telecommunications] is valued at $5.64B. CPROF’s [@Major Telecommunications] market capitalization is $714.84K. The market cap for tickers in the [@Major Telecommunications] industry ranges from $233.22B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Major Telecommunications] industry is $18.86B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BZQIY’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileCPROF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • BZQIY’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • CPROF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, BZQIY is a better buy in the long-term than CPROF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BZQIY’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CPROF’s TA Score has 1 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BZQIY’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • CPROF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 1 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BZQIY is a better buy in the short-term than CPROF.

Price Growth

BZQIY (@Major Telecommunications) experienced а +15.26% price change this week, while CPROF (@Major Telecommunications) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Major Telecommunications industry was +0.43%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.54%, and the average quarterly price growth was +16.28%.

Reported Earning Dates

BZQIY is expected to report earnings on Mar 19, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Major Telecommunications (+0.43% weekly)

Major telecommunications include companies that make communication possible across the globe – by providing voice and data transmission via multiple channels such as phone or the Internet, through airwaves or cables, through wires or wirelessly. The ease with which we connect with anyone, anywhere in the world is thanks in large part to the infrastructure created by the telecom industry. Some major telecom players include AT&T Inc., Verizon Communications Inc. and Nippon Telegraph and Telephone Corporation.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BZQIY($5.64B) has a higher market cap than CPROF($715K). BZQIY YTD gains are higher at: 64.137 vs. CPROF (0.000). BZQIY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 3.73B vs. CPROF (-386K). BZQIY has higher revenues than CPROF: BZQIY (8.81B) vs CPROF (9.55M).
BZQIYCPROFBZQIY / CPROF
Capitalization5.64B715K788,951%
EBITDA3.73B-386K-966,839%
Gain YTD64.1370.000-
P/E Ratio14.06N/A-
Revenue8.81B9.55M92,201%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total DebtN/A250K-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BZQIY vs CPROF: Fundamental Ratings
BZQIY
CPROF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
9245
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
35
Fair valued
7
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3013
SMR RATING
1..100
2097
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4456
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
15100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CPROF's Valuation (7) in the null industry is in the same range as BZQIY (35). This means that CPROF’s stock grew similarly to BZQIY’s over the last 12 months.

CPROF's Profit vs Risk Rating (13) in the null industry is in the same range as BZQIY (30). This means that CPROF’s stock grew similarly to BZQIY’s over the last 12 months.

BZQIY's SMR Rating (20) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for CPROF (97). This means that BZQIY’s stock grew significantly faster than CPROF’s over the last 12 months.

BZQIY's Price Growth Rating (44) in the null industry is in the same range as CPROF (56). This means that BZQIY’s stock grew similarly to CPROF’s over the last 12 months.

BZQIY's P/E Growth Rating (15) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for CPROF (100). This means that BZQIY’s stock grew significantly faster than CPROF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BZQIYCPROF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 28 days ago
33%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
49%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
39%
Bullish Trend 28 days ago
10%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
47%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
24%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
23%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
50%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
56%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BZQIY
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
CPROF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TVAFX79.150.59
+0.75%
Thornburg Small/Mid Cap Core A
CICEX67.710.20
+0.30%
American Funds Invmt Co of Amer 529E
CRRVX9.720.02
+0.21%
Columbia Real Estate Equity Inst2
JANWX130.540.18
+0.14%
Janus Henderson Global Research D
TLISX13.820.02
+0.14%
Nuveen Quant Intl Small Cap Eq A

BZQIY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BZQIY and CGECF have been poorly correlated (+0% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BZQIY and CGECF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BZQIY
1D Price
Change %
BZQIY100%
+15.26%
CGECF - BZQIY
0%
Poorly correlated
+1.55%
CPROF - BZQIY
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CLCMF - BZQIY
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BZQIF - BZQIY
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BGAOY - BZQIY
-4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

CPROF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CPROF and BTGOF have been poorly correlated (+3% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CPROF and BTGOF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CPROF
1D Price
Change %
CPROF100%
N/A
BTGOF - CPROF
3%
Poorly correlated
+2.27%
BZQIF - CPROF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BGAOY - CPROF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BZQIY - CPROF
0%
Poorly correlated
+15.26%
CVHSY - CPROF
-0%
Poorly correlated
-3.81%
More