BZQIY
Price
$13.69
Change
+$4.46 (+48.32%)
Updated
Feb 3 closing price
Capitalization
7.47B
42 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
CLCMF
Price
$3.03
Change
-$0.59 (-16.30%)
Updated
Sep 18 closing price
Capitalization
2.13B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

BZQIY vs CLCMF

Header iconBZQIY vs CLCMF Comparison
Open Charts BZQIY vs CLCMFBanner chart's image
Bezeq The Israel Telecommunication
Price$13.69
Change+$4.46 (+48.32%)
Volume$104
Capitalization7.47B
Sinch AB
Price$3.03
Change-$0.59 (-16.30%)
Volume$10
Capitalization2.13B
BZQIY vs CLCMF Comparison Chart in %
BZQIY
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
CLCMF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BZQIY vs. CLCMF commentary
Feb 05, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BZQIY is a Buy and CLCMF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 05, 2026
Stock price -- (BZQIY: $13.69 vs. CLCMF: $3.00)
Brand notoriety: BZQIY and CLCMF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Major Telecommunications industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BZQIY: 27% vs. CLCMF: 3%
Market capitalization -- BZQIY: $7.47B vs. CLCMF: $2.13B
BZQIY [@Major Telecommunications] is valued at $7.47B. CLCMF’s [@Major Telecommunications] market capitalization is $2.13B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Major Telecommunications] industry ranges from $225.7B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Major Telecommunications] industry is $19.98B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BZQIY’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileCLCMF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • BZQIY’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • CLCMF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, BZQIY is a better buy in the long-term than CLCMF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BZQIY’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CLCMF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BZQIY’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • CLCMF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 1 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CLCMF is a better buy in the short-term than BZQIY.

Price Growth

BZQIY (@Major Telecommunications) experienced а +14.08% price change this week, while CLCMF (@Major Telecommunications) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Major Telecommunications industry was +0.80%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.50%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.18%.

Reported Earning Dates

BZQIY is expected to report earnings on Mar 19, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Major Telecommunications (+0.80% weekly)

Major telecommunications include companies that make communication possible across the globe – by providing voice and data transmission via multiple channels such as phone or the Internet, through airwaves or cables, through wires or wirelessly. The ease with which we connect with anyone, anywhere in the world is thanks in large part to the infrastructure created by the telecom industry. Some major telecom players include AT&T Inc., Verizon Communications Inc. and Nippon Telegraph and Telephone Corporation.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BZQIY($7.48B) has a higher market cap than CLCMF($2.13B). CLCMF has higher P/E ratio than BZQIY: CLCMF (134.09) vs BZQIY (16.88). BZQIY YTD gains are higher at: 25.827 vs. CLCMF (0.000). CLCMF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 8.43B vs. BZQIY (3.72B). BZQIY has more cash in the bank: 2.88B vs. CLCMF (592M). CLCMF has less debt than BZQIY: CLCMF (6.33B) vs BZQIY (9.48B). CLCMF has higher revenues than BZQIY: CLCMF (28.1B) vs BZQIY (8.72B).
BZQIYCLCMFBZQIY / CLCMF
Capitalization7.48B2.13B352%
EBITDA3.72B8.43B44%
Gain YTD25.8270.000-
P/E Ratio16.88134.0913%
Revenue8.72B28.1B31%
Total Cash2.88B592M486%
Total Debt9.48B6.33B150%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BZQIY vs CLCMF: Fundamental Ratings
BZQIY
CLCMF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
4741
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
45
Fair valued
92
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
19100
SMR RATING
1..100
1990
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3854
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2499
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
65n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BZQIY's Valuation (45) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CLCMF (92). This means that BZQIY’s stock grew somewhat faster than CLCMF’s over the last 12 months.

BZQIY's Profit vs Risk Rating (19) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for CLCMF (100). This means that BZQIY’s stock grew significantly faster than CLCMF’s over the last 12 months.

BZQIY's SMR Rating (19) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for CLCMF (90). This means that BZQIY’s stock grew significantly faster than CLCMF’s over the last 12 months.

BZQIY's Price Growth Rating (38) in the null industry is in the same range as CLCMF (54). This means that BZQIY’s stock grew similarly to CLCMF’s over the last 12 months.

BZQIY's P/E Growth Rating (24) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for CLCMF (99). This means that BZQIY’s stock grew significantly faster than CLCMF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BZQIYCLCMF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
33%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
21%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
46%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
22%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
48%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
25%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
49%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
27%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
56%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
48%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
42%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BZQIY
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
CLCMF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MDFSX8.650.15
+1.76%
Manning & Napier Disciplined Value S
USDAUD1.42N/A
N/A
United States Dollar - Australian Dollar
EURCNY8.20N/A
N/A
Euro - China Yuan
HKDJPY19.94N/A
N/A
Hong Kong Dollar - Japan Yen
HEMZX8.08-0.13
-1.58%
Virtus SGA Emerging Markets Equity A

BZQIY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BZQIY and CGECF have been poorly correlated (+0% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BZQIY and CGECF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BZQIY
1D Price
Change %
BZQIY100%
N/A
CGECF - BZQIY
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CPROF - BZQIY
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CLCMF - BZQIY
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BZQIF - BZQIY
-0%
Poorly correlated
+3.14%
BGAOY - BZQIY
-4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

CLCMF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CLCMF and TIAOF have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CLCMF and TIAOF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CLCMF
1D Price
Change %
CLCMF100%
N/A
TIAOF - CLCMF
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CGEAF - CLCMF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CVHSY - CLCMF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BGAOY - CLCMF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BZQIF - CLCMF
0%
Poorly correlated
+3.14%
More