BZQIY
Price
$9.02
Change
-$0.35 (-3.74%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
4.91B
65 days until earnings call
CGEAF
Price
$46.63
Change
-$0.12 (-0.26%)
Updated
Aug 28 closing price
Capitalization
1.98B
Interact to see
Advertisement

BZQIY vs CGEAF

Header iconBZQIY vs CGEAF Comparison
Open Charts BZQIY vs CGEAFBanner chart's image
Bezeq The Israel Telecommunication
Price$9.02
Change-$0.35 (-3.74%)
Volume$765
Capitalization4.91B
Cogeco Communications
Price$46.63
Change-$0.12 (-0.26%)
Volume$2.18K
Capitalization1.98B
BZQIY vs CGEAF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BZQIY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CGEAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BZQIY vs. CGEAF commentary
Sep 08, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BZQIY is a Hold and CGEAF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 08, 2025
Stock price -- (BZQIY: $9.02 vs. CGEAF: $46.63)
Brand notoriety: BZQIY and CGEAF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Major Telecommunications industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BZQIY: 261% vs. CGEAF: 65%
Market capitalization -- BZQIY: $4.91B vs. CGEAF: $1.98B
BZQIY [@Major Telecommunications] is valued at $4.91B. CGEAF’s [@Major Telecommunications] market capitalization is $1.98B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Major Telecommunications] industry ranges from $284.46B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Major Telecommunications] industry is $19.69B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BZQIY’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileCGEAF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BZQIY’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • CGEAF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, BZQIY is a better buy in the long-term than CGEAF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BZQIY’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CGEAF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BZQIY’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • CGEAF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CGEAF is a better buy in the short-term than BZQIY.

Price Growth

BZQIY (@Major Telecommunications) experienced а -3.71% price change this week, while CGEAF (@Major Telecommunications) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Major Telecommunications industry was -0.33%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.42%, and the average quarterly price growth was +44.59%.

Reported Earning Dates

BZQIY is expected to report earnings on Nov 12, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Major Telecommunications (-0.33% weekly)

Major telecommunications include companies that make communication possible across the globe – by providing voice and data transmission via multiple channels such as phone or the Internet, through airwaves or cables, through wires or wirelessly. The ease with which we connect with anyone, anywhere in the world is thanks in large part to the infrastructure created by the telecom industry. Some major telecom players include AT&T Inc., Verizon Communications Inc. and Nippon Telegraph and Telephone Corporation.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BZQIY($4.91B) has a higher market cap than CGEAF($1.98B). BZQIY has higher P/E ratio than CGEAF: BZQIY (13.78) vs CGEAF (8.33). BZQIY YTD gains are higher at: 32.284 vs. CGEAF (-0.397). BZQIY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 3.73B vs. CGEAF (1.42B). BZQIY has more cash in the bank: 2.58B vs. CGEAF (245M). CGEAF has less debt than BZQIY: CGEAF (4.78B) vs BZQIY (9.45B). BZQIY has higher revenues than CGEAF: BZQIY (8.81B) vs CGEAF (2.95B).
BZQIYCGEAFBZQIY / CGEAF
Capitalization4.91B1.98B248%
EBITDA3.73B1.42B263%
Gain YTD32.284-0.397-8,127%
P/E Ratio13.788.33165%
Revenue8.81B2.95B299%
Total Cash2.58B245M1,053%
Total Debt9.45B4.78B198%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BZQIY vs CGEAF: Fundamental Ratings
BZQIY
CGEAF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
32
Undervalued
32
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
40100
SMR RATING
1..100
2096
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4360
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1649
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BZQIY's Valuation (32) in the null industry is in the same range as CGEAF (32). This means that BZQIY’s stock grew similarly to CGEAF’s over the last 12 months.

BZQIY's Profit vs Risk Rating (40) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CGEAF (100). This means that BZQIY’s stock grew somewhat faster than CGEAF’s over the last 12 months.

BZQIY's SMR Rating (20) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for CGEAF (96). This means that BZQIY’s stock grew significantly faster than CGEAF’s over the last 12 months.

BZQIY's Price Growth Rating (43) in the null industry is in the same range as CGEAF (60). This means that BZQIY’s stock grew similarly to CGEAF’s over the last 12 months.

BZQIY's P/E Growth Rating (16) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CGEAF (49). This means that BZQIY’s stock grew somewhat faster than CGEAF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BZQIYCGEAF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
50%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
37%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
43%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
33%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
39%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
31%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
49%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
37%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
44%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
28%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
40%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 27 days ago
63%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
32%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
44%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BZQIY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CGEAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TEQCX30.070.08
+0.27%
Touchstone Non-US Equity C
FACSX53.840.09
+0.17%
Nuveen Mid Cap Value Opportunities C
ACROX18.350.03
+0.16%
ACR Opportunity Fund I Shares
PPSRX20.58-0.05
-0.24%
Principal Large Cap Value III R5
OIEJX25.96-0.14
-0.54%
JPMorgan Equity Income R6

BZQIY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BZQIY and CVHSY have been poorly correlated (+9% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BZQIY and CVHSY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BZQIY
1D Price
Change %
BZQIY100%
-3.71%
CVHSY - BZQIY
9%
Poorly correlated
-14.41%
BGAOY - BZQIY
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CGEAF - BZQIY
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CLCMF - BZQIY
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CPROF - BZQIY
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

CGEAF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CGEAF and CGECF have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CGEAF and CGECF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CGEAF
1D Price
Change %
CGEAF100%
N/A
CGECF - CGEAF
29%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CHRYY - CGEAF
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BTGOF - CGEAF
4%
Poorly correlated
+0.55%
BZQIF - CGEAF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BGAOY - CGEAF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More