Advertisement
BZQIF vs CLCMF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BZQIF is a Buy and CLCMF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
BZQIF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileCLCMF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- BZQIF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- CLCMF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
BZQIF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CLCMF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).
- BZQIF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 2 bearish.
- CLCMF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 1 bearish.
Price Growth
BZQIF (@Major Telecommunications) experienced а +23.79% price change this week, while CLCMF (@Major Telecommunications) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Major Telecommunications industry was +1.10%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.73%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.86%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Major Telecommunications (+1.10% weekly)Major telecommunications include companies that make communication possible across the globe – by providing voice and data transmission via multiple channels such as phone or the Internet, through airwaves or cables, through wires or wirelessly. The ease with which we connect with anyone, anywhere in the world is thanks in large part to the infrastructure created by the telecom industry. Some major telecom players include AT&T Inc., Verizon Communications Inc. and Nippon Telegraph and Telephone Corporation.
| BZQIF | CLCMF | BZQIF / CLCMF | |
| Capitalization | 7.24B | 2.27B | 319% |
| EBITDA | 3.72B | 8.43B | 44% |
| Gain YTD | 16.173 | 0.000 | - |
| P/E Ratio | 15.82 | 134.09 | 12% |
| Revenue | 8.72B | 28.1B | 31% |
| Total Cash | 2.88B | 592M | 486% |
| Total Debt | 9.48B | 6.33B | 150% |
BZQIF | CLCMF | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 32 | 41 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 41 Fair valued | 91 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 37 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 19 | 90 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 39 | 53 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 37 | 99 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
BZQIF's Valuation (41) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CLCMF (91). This means that BZQIF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CLCMF’s over the last 12 months.
BZQIF's Profit vs Risk Rating (37) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CLCMF (100). This means that BZQIF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CLCMF’s over the last 12 months.
BZQIF's SMR Rating (19) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for CLCMF (90). This means that BZQIF’s stock grew significantly faster than CLCMF’s over the last 12 months.
BZQIF's Price Growth Rating (39) in the null industry is in the same range as CLCMF (53). This means that BZQIF’s stock grew similarly to CLCMF’s over the last 12 months.
BZQIF's P/E Growth Rating (37) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CLCMF (99). This means that BZQIF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CLCMF’s over the last 12 months.
| BZQIF | CLCMF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 50% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 39% | N/A |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 29% | 2 days ago 26% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 33% | 2 days ago 22% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 38% | 2 days ago 25% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 38% | 2 days ago 27% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 12% | 2 days ago 42% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| QFVOX | 30.95 | 0.63 | +2.08% |
| Pear Tree Polaris Foreign Value Ord | |||
| MNDFX | 9.24 | 0.10 | +1.09% |
| Manning & Napier Disciplined Value I | |||
| SSGSX | 48.32 | 0.25 | +0.52% |
| Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A | |||
| JCVSX | 19.30 | -0.12 | -0.62% |
| JHancock Classic Value R2 | |||
| VFIAX | 639.05 | -5.41 | -0.84% |
| Vanguard 500 Index Admiral | |||
BZQIF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that BZQIF and CHRYY have been poorly correlated (+5% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BZQIF and CHRYY's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BZQIF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BZQIF | 100% | N/A | ||
| CHRYY - BZQIF | 5% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| BGAOY - BZQIF | 4% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| CGEAF - BZQIF | 3% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| BTGOF - BZQIF | 2% Poorly correlated | +5.58% | ||
| CGECF - BZQIF | 1% Poorly correlated | +1.31% | ||
More | ||||
CLCMF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that CLCMF and TIAOF have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CLCMF and TIAOF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CLCMF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CLCMF | 100% | N/A | ||
| TIAOF - CLCMF | 27% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| CGEAF - CLCMF | 2% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| CVHSY - CLCMF | 1% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| BGAOY - CLCMF | 1% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| BZQIF - CLCMF | 0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||