BZLYF
Price
$11.93
Change
+$0.04 (+0.34%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
7.09B
LCSHF
Price
$8.90
Change
+$0.17 (+1.95%)
Updated
Sep 24 closing price
Capitalization
2.15B
36 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

BZLYF vs LCSHF

Header iconBZLYF vs LCSHF Comparison
Open Charts BZLYF vs LCSHFBanner chart's image
Beazley
Price$11.93
Change+$0.04 (+0.34%)
Volume$4.47K
Capitalization7.09B
Lancashire Holdings
Price$8.90
Change+$0.17 (+1.95%)
Volume$700
Capitalization2.15B
BZLYF vs LCSHF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BZLYF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LCSHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BZLYF vs. LCSHF commentary
Sep 30, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BZLYF is a Hold and LCSHF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 30, 2025
Stock price -- (BZLYF: $11.93 vs. LCSHF: $8.90)
Brand notoriety: BZLYF and LCSHF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Specialty Insurance industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BZLYF: 150% vs. LCSHF: 13%
Market capitalization -- BZLYF: $7.09B vs. LCSHF: $2.15B
BZLYF [@Specialty Insurance] is valued at $7.09B. LCSHF’s [@Specialty Insurance] market capitalization is $2.15B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Specialty Insurance] industry ranges from $16.25B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Specialty Insurance] industry is $3.66B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BZLYF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileLCSHF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BZLYF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • LCSHF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, BZLYF is a better buy in the long-term than LCSHF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BZLYF’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LCSHF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BZLYF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • LCSHF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BZLYF is a better buy in the short-term than LCSHF.

Price Growth

BZLYF (@Specialty Insurance) experienced а +2.47% price change this week, while LCSHF (@Specialty Insurance) price change was +1.95% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Specialty Insurance industry was -0.91%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.68%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.53%.

Reported Earning Dates

LCSHF is expected to report earnings on Nov 05, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Specialty Insurance (-0.91% weekly)

Specialty insurance typically caters to niche-markets, and covers items that are special or unique and/or items that are not typically covered under other insurance policies. Restoration or purchase of a one-of-a-kind collector’s item, high-value home, recreational vehicles, sailboat or even jet skis, horses and farms, all-terrain vehicle, funerals, museums and fine art collections are some examples– one or more of which are covered by a specialty insurance provider. In some cases, a specialty insurance could also complement someone’s existing auto, home and umbrella policies. Markel Corp, for Fidelity National Financial, Inc., Assurant, Inc. and Athene Holding Ltd. are examples of specialty insurance providers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BZLYF($7.09B) has a higher market cap than LCSHF($2.15B). LCSHF has higher P/E ratio than BZLYF: LCSHF (9.67) vs BZLYF (7.88). BZLYF YTD gains are higher at: 19.456 vs. LCSHF (7.100). BZLYF has more cash in the bank: 986M vs. LCSHF (653M). LCSHF has less debt than BZLYF: LCSHF (469M) vs BZLYF (620M). LCSHF has higher revenues than BZLYF: LCSHF (1.82B) vs BZLYF (1.16B).
BZLYFLCSHFBZLYF / LCSHF
Capitalization7.09B2.15B330%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD19.4567.100274%
P/E Ratio7.889.6781%
Revenue1.16B1.82B64%
Total Cash986M653M151%
Total Debt620M469M132%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BZLYF vs LCSHF: Fundamental Ratings
BZLYF
LCSHF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
87
Overvalued
44
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
20100
SMR RATING
1..100
5268
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5047
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1611
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

LCSHF's Valuation (44) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BZLYF (87). This means that LCSHF’s stock grew somewhat faster than BZLYF’s over the last 12 months.

BZLYF's Profit vs Risk Rating (20) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for LCSHF (100). This means that BZLYF’s stock grew significantly faster than LCSHF’s over the last 12 months.

BZLYF's SMR Rating (52) in the null industry is in the same range as LCSHF (68). This means that BZLYF’s stock grew similarly to LCSHF’s over the last 12 months.

LCSHF's Price Growth Rating (47) in the null industry is in the same range as BZLYF (50). This means that LCSHF’s stock grew similarly to BZLYF’s over the last 12 months.

LCSHF's P/E Growth Rating (11) in the null industry is in the same range as BZLYF (16). This means that LCSHF’s stock grew similarly to BZLYF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BZLYFLCSHF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
55%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
49%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
35%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
45%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
39%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
35%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
47%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
49%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
50%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
25%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BZLYF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LCSHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MDEFX22.09N/A
N/A
BlackRock International Select Eq Inv A
GSUSX56.42N/A
N/A
Goldman Sachs US Equity Insights C
RAFAX38.04N/A
N/A
American Funds AMCAP R1
FRVFX47.62N/A
N/A
Franklin Small Cap Value C
GSRCX12.26N/A
N/A
Goldman Sachs Rising Dividend Gr C

BZLYF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BZLYF and ACMTA have been poorly correlated (+17% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BZLYF and ACMTA's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BZLYF
1D Price
Change %
BZLYF100%
N/A
ACMTA - BZLYF
17%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HIPO - BZLYF
16%
Poorly correlated
-0.08%
TRRSF - BZLYF
11%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LCSHF - BZLYF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RYAN - BZLYF
0%
Poorly correlated
+0.50%
More

LCSHF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that LCSHF and RYAN have been poorly correlated (+10% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LCSHF and RYAN's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LCSHF
1D Price
Change %
LCSHF100%
N/A
RYAN - LCSHF
10%
Poorly correlated
+0.50%
FACO - LCSHF
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BZLYF - LCSHF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ACMTA - LCSHF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ACMT - LCSHF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More