BZLFY
Price
$20.61
Change
+$0.06 (+0.29%)
Updated
Dec 20 closing price
71 days until earnings call
PFGC
Price
$84.39
Change
-$0.07 (-0.08%)
Updated
Dec 20 closing price
45 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

BZLFY vs PFGC

Header iconBZLFY vs PFGC Comparison
Open Charts BZLFY vs PFGCBanner chart's image
Bunzl
Price$20.61
Change+$0.06 (+0.29%)
Volume$58.25K
CapitalizationN/A
Performance Food Group
Price$84.39
Change-$0.07 (-0.08%)
Volume$2.47M
CapitalizationN/A
BZLFY vs PFGC Comparison Chart
Loading...
BZLFY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PFGC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BZLFY vs. PFGC commentary
Dec 23, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BZLFY is a Hold and PFGC is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 23, 2024
Stock price -- (BZLFY: $20.61 vs. PFGC: $84.39)
Brand notoriety: BZLFY and PFGC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Food Distributors industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BZLFY: 133% vs. PFGC: 233%
Market capitalization -- BZLFY: $12.54B vs. PFGC: $11.53B
BZLFY [@Food Distributors] is valued at $12.54B. PFGC’s [@Food Distributors] market capitalization is $11.53B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Food Distributors] industry ranges from $40.11B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Food Distributors] industry is $5B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BZLFY’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whilePFGC’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BZLFY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • PFGC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, PFGC is a better buy in the long-term than BZLFY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BZLFY’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PFGC’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BZLFY’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • PFGC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BZLFY is a better buy in the short-term than PFGC.

Price Growth

BZLFY (@Food Distributors) experienced а -7.14% price change this week, while PFGC (@Food Distributors) price change was -4.81% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food Distributors industry was -1.36%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.77%, and the average quarterly price growth was +26.73%.

Reported Earning Dates

BZLFY is expected to report earnings on Mar 03, 2025.

PFGC is expected to report earnings on Feb 05, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Food Distributors (-1.36% weekly)

Food distributors function as intermediaries between food manufacturers and food service operators (such as chefs, restaurants, beverage managers, cafeterias, industrial caterers, hospitals and nursing homes). Food distribution companies buy, store and then supply food items to the food service operators, thereby allowing the latter to have access to a wide range of food items from various manufacturers. Sysco Corporation, US Foods Holding Corp. and Herbalife Nutrition Ltd. are some of the biggest (by market cap) U.S. companies in this segment. Most food service operators buy from local, specialty, and/or broad line food service distributors on a daily or weekly basis. With the rise in e-commerce, consumers are increasingly expecting lower prices, faster service, and higher quality – something that potentially creates the impetus on distribution networks to raise their game.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BZLFY($12.5B) has a higher market cap than PFGC($11.5B). PFGC has higher P/E ratio than BZLFY: PFGC (27.04) vs BZLFY (20.20). PFGC YTD gains are higher at: 22.039 vs. BZLFY (9.616). PFGC has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.35B vs. BZLFY (1.04B). PFGC has higher revenues than BZLFY: PFGC (57.9B) vs BZLFY (12B).
BZLFYPFGCBZLFY / PFGC
Capitalization12.5B11.5B109%
EBITDA1.04B1.35B77%
Gain YTD9.61622.03944%
P/E Ratio20.2027.0475%
Revenue12B57.9B21%
Total CashN/A16.4M-
Total DebtN/A5.04B-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BZLFY vs PFGC: Fundamental Ratings
BZLFY
PFGC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5067
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
43
Fair valued
69
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1436
SMR RATING
1..100
8165
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5644
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9232
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BZLFY's Valuation (43) in the null industry is in the same range as PFGC (69) in the Food Distributors industry. This means that BZLFY’s stock grew similarly to PFGC’s over the last 12 months.

BZLFY's Profit vs Risk Rating (14) in the null industry is in the same range as PFGC (36) in the Food Distributors industry. This means that BZLFY’s stock grew similarly to PFGC’s over the last 12 months.

PFGC's SMR Rating (65) in the Food Distributors industry is in the same range as BZLFY (81) in the null industry. This means that PFGC’s stock grew similarly to BZLFY’s over the last 12 months.

PFGC's Price Growth Rating (44) in the Food Distributors industry is in the same range as BZLFY (56) in the null industry. This means that PFGC’s stock grew similarly to BZLFY’s over the last 12 months.

PFGC's P/E Growth Rating (32) in the Food Distributors industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BZLFY (92) in the null industry. This means that PFGC’s stock grew somewhat faster than BZLFY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BZLFYPFGC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
52%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
74%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
45%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
69%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
50%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 18 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 18 days ago
74%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
70%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
53%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
78%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
BZLFY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PFGC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GME29.820.82
+2.83%
GameStop Corp
AAPL254.494.70
+1.88%
Apple
SPY591.157.02
+1.20%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
BTC.X97224.730000-531.203100
-0.54%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
TSLA421.06-15.11
-3.46%
Tesla

BZLFY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BZLFY and HFFG have been poorly correlated (+14% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BZLFY and HFFG's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BZLFY
1D Price
Change %
BZLFY100%
+0.29%
HFFG - BZLFY
14%
Poorly correlated
+4.22%
PFGC - BZLFY
13%
Poorly correlated
-0.08%
COLFF - BZLFY
10%
Poorly correlated
-8.46%
BZLFF - BZLFY
9%
Poorly correlated
N/A
USFD - BZLFY
9%
Poorly correlated
+1.24%
More

PFGC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PFGC has been closely correlated with USFD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PFGC jumps, then USFD could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PFGC
1D Price
Change %
PFGC100%
-0.08%
USFD - PFGC
77%
Closely correlated
+1.24%
CHEF - PFGC
47%
Loosely correlated
-0.21%
SYY - PFGC
34%
Loosely correlated
+0.55%
UNFI - PFGC
29%
Poorly correlated
-1.26%
AVO - PFGC
27%
Poorly correlated
+17.29%
More