BZDLF
Price
$0.04
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
5.49M
CDBMF
Price
$0.56
Change
+$0.01 (+1.82%)
Updated
Jul 21 closing price
Capitalization
26.59M
Interact to see
Advertisement

BZDLF vs CDBMF

Header iconBZDLF vs CDBMF Comparison
Open Charts BZDLF vs CDBMFBanner chart's image
Kincora Copper
Price$0.04
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$58.93K
Capitalization5.49M
Cordoba Minerals
Price$0.56
Change+$0.01 (+1.82%)
Volume$2.5K
Capitalization26.59M
BZDLF vs CDBMF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BZDLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CDBMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BZDLF vs. CDBMF commentary
Jul 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BZDLF is a Hold and CDBMF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 27, 2025
Stock price -- (BZDLF: $0.04 vs. CDBMF: $0.56)
Brand notoriety: BZDLF and CDBMF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BZDLF: 116% vs. CDBMF: 13%
Market capitalization -- BZDLF: $5.49M vs. CDBMF: $26.59M
BZDLF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $5.49M. CDBMF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $26.59M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $3.14B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BZDLF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileCDBMF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • BZDLF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • CDBMF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, BZDLF is a better buy in the long-term than CDBMF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BZDLF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CDBMF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BZDLF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • CDBMF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CDBMF is a better buy in the short-term than BZDLF.

Price Growth

BZDLF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а -11.53% price change this week, while CDBMF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was +0.65% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +2.18%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +15.03%, and the average quarterly price growth was +34.74%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+2.18% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CDBMF($26.6M) has a higher market cap than BZDLF($5.49M). BZDLF YTD gains are higher at: 137.975 vs. CDBMF (99.214). BZDLF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -2.75M vs. CDBMF (-31.74M). BZDLF has more cash in the bank: 2.05M vs. CDBMF (1.15M). BZDLF has less debt than CDBMF: BZDLF (454K) vs CDBMF (651K). BZDLF (0) and CDBMF (0) have equivalent revenues.
BZDLFCDBMFBZDLF / CDBMF
Capitalization5.49M26.6M21%
EBITDA-2.75M-31.74M9%
Gain YTD137.97599.214139%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash2.05M1.15M179%
Total Debt454K651K70%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BZDLF vs CDBMF: Fundamental Ratings
BZDLF
CDBMF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
29
Undervalued
71
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
9399
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3539
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BZDLF's Valuation (29) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CDBMF (71). This means that BZDLF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CDBMF’s over the last 12 months.

BZDLF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as CDBMF (100). This means that BZDLF’s stock grew similarly to CDBMF’s over the last 12 months.

BZDLF's SMR Rating (93) in the null industry is in the same range as CDBMF (99). This means that BZDLF’s stock grew similarly to CDBMF’s over the last 12 months.

BZDLF's Price Growth Rating (35) in the null industry is in the same range as CDBMF (39). This means that BZDLF’s stock grew similarly to CDBMF’s over the last 12 months.

BZDLF's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as CDBMF (100). This means that BZDLF’s stock grew similarly to CDBMF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BZDLFCDBMF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
59%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
35%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
68%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
39%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
59%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BZDLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CDBMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MNSO19.170.22
+1.16%
MINISO Group Holding Limited
INUV5.650.06
+1.07%
Inuvo
SAP288.031.87
+0.65%
SAP SE
GWRS10.17-0.10
-0.97%
Global Water Resources
KSS12.79-0.84
-6.16%
Kohls Corp

BZDLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BZDLF and ABCFF have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BZDLF and ABCFF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BZDLF
1D Price
Change %
BZDLF100%
+0.27%
ABCFF - BZDLF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
JZRIF - BZDLF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CDBMF - BZDLF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AXVEF - BZDLF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
EDDYF - BZDLF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

CDBMF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CDBMF and SRCAF have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CDBMF and SRCAF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CDBMF
1D Price
Change %
CDBMF100%
N/A
SRCAF - CDBMF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BZDLF - CDBMF
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.27%
NEXA - CDBMF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SFRRF - CDBMF
20%
Poorly correlated
-5.41%
CHXMF - CDBMF
8%
Poorly correlated
-5.27%
More