BZ
Price
$18.20
Change
-$5.21 (-22.26%)
Updated
Feb 3 closing price
Capitalization
8.81B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
WB
Price
$10.25
Change
-$2.12 (-17.14%)
Updated
Feb 3 closing price
Capitalization
2.57B
28 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

BZ vs WB

Header iconBZ vs WB Comparison
Open Charts BZ vs WBBanner chart's image
Kanzhun
Price$18.20
Change-$5.21 (-22.26%)
Volume$5.04M
Capitalization8.81B
Weibo
Price$10.25
Change-$2.12 (-17.14%)
Volume$1.24M
Capitalization2.57B
BZ vs WB Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BZ vs. WB commentary
Feb 04, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BZ is a Hold and WB is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 04, 2026
Stock price -- (BZ: $18.20 vs. WB: $10.25)
Brand notoriety: BZ: Not notable vs. WB: Notable
Both companies represent the Internet Software/Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BZ: 166% vs. WB: 128%
Market capitalization -- BZ: $8.81B vs. WB: $2.57B
BZ [@Internet Software/Services] is valued at $8.81B. WB’s [@Internet Software/Services] market capitalization is $2.57B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Internet Software/Services] industry ranges from $4.1T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Internet Software/Services] industry is $97.85B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BZ’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileWB’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BZ’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • WB’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both BZ and WB are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BZ’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WB’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BZ’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • WB’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, WB is a better buy in the short-term than BZ.

Price Growth

BZ (@Internet Software/Services) experienced а -5.60% price change this week, while WB (@Internet Software/Services) price change was -5.44% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Internet Software/Services industry was -5.44%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.50%, and the average quarterly price growth was +164.13%.

Reported Earning Dates

WB is expected to report earnings on Mar 04, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Internet Software/Services (-5.44% weekly)

Companies in this industry typically license software on a subscription basis and it is centrally hosted. Such products usually go by the names web-based software, on-demand software and hosted software. Cloud computing has emerged as a major force in this space, making it possible to save files to a remote database (without requiring them to be saved on local storage device); as long as a device has access to the web, it can access the data and the software programs to run it. This has in many cases facilitated cost efficiency, speed and security of data for businesses and consumers. Alphabet Inc., Facebook, Inc. and Yahoo! Inc. are some well-known names in the internet software/services industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BZ($8.81B) has a higher market cap than WB($2.57B). BZ has higher P/E ratio than WB: BZ (23.14) vs WB (5.86). WB YTD gains are higher at: 0.294 vs. BZ (-10.697). BZ has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 2.16B vs. WB (511M). BZ has more cash in the bank: 19.2B vs. WB (2.04B). BZ has less debt than WB: BZ (166M) vs WB (1.86B). BZ has higher revenues than WB: BZ (8.01B) vs WB (1.74B).
BZWBBZ / WB
Capitalization8.81B2.57B343%
EBITDA2.16B511M423%
Gain YTD-10.6970.294-3,644%
P/E Ratio23.145.86395%
Revenue8.01B1.74B460%
Total Cash19.2B2.04B939%
Total Debt166M1.86B9%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
WB: Fundamental Ratings
WB
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
74
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
3
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
62
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
55
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
68
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
29

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BZWB
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
81%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
80%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
84%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
79%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
74%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 15 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
80%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
89%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
74%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BZ
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
WB
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GTMIX17.690.17
+0.97%
GMO International Opportunistic Val III
PWDCX11.400.09
+0.80%
DF Tactical Dividend Fund C
CCASX66.79-0.32
-0.48%
Conestoga Small Cap Investors
VHCIX143.28-1.34
-0.93%
Vanguard Health Care Index Admiral
RMQHX523.91-16.86
-3.12%
Rydex Monthly Rbl NASDAQ-100® 2x Strt H

BZ and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BZ has been loosely correlated with BILI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 63% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BZ jumps, then BILI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BZ
1D Price
Change %
BZ100%
-3.19%
BILI - BZ
63%
Loosely correlated
-4.21%
ATHM - BZ
60%
Loosely correlated
-3.33%
WB - BZ
57%
Loosely correlated
-2.10%
BIDU - BZ
52%
Loosely correlated
-2.50%
TME - BZ
50%
Loosely correlated
-0.91%
More

WB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WB has been loosely correlated with BILI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if WB jumps, then BILI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WB
1D Price
Change %
WB100%
-2.10%
BILI - WB
61%
Loosely correlated
-4.21%
TCEHY - WB
58%
Loosely correlated
-3.33%
ATHM - WB
58%
Loosely correlated
-3.33%
BIDU - WB
54%
Loosely correlated
-2.50%
BZ - WB
53%
Loosely correlated
-3.19%
More