Advertisement
BZ vs MCHS
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BZ is a Buy and MCHS is a Hold.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
BZ’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
- BZ’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
| BZ | MCHS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago 85% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 82% | 4 days ago 87% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 82% | 4 days ago 77% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 78% | 4 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 79% | 4 days ago 83% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 75% | 4 days ago 84% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 75% | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 13 days ago 79% | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 76% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 66% | 4 days ago 68% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| CWEB | 39.97 | 0.37 | +0.93% |
| Direxion Dly CSI CHN Itnet Bull 2X Shrs | |||
| JCTR | 80.93 | N/A | N/A |
| JPMorgan Carbon Transition US Eq ETF | |||
| FSCC | 25.91 | N/A | N/A |
| Federated Hermes MDT Small Cap Core ETF | |||
| QPFF | 35.30 | -0.05 | -0.13% |
| American Century Quality Preferred ETF | |||
| SH | 39.87 | -0.16 | -0.40% |
| ProShares Short S&P500 | |||
BZ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BZ has been loosely correlated with UPWK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 35% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BZ jumps, then UPWK could also see price increases.
MCHS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MCHS has been loosely correlated with BZ. These tickers have moved in lockstep 54% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MCHS jumps, then BZ could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MCHS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MCHS | 100% | N/A | ||
| BZ - MCHS | 54% Loosely correlated | +2.84% | ||
| YMM - MCHS | 50% Loosely correlated | -2.15% | ||
| ACMR - MCHS | 46% Loosely correlated | -2.75% | ||
| ATAT - MCHS | 38% Loosely correlated | +0.99% | ||
| ZH - MCHS | 37% Loosely correlated | N/A |