Advertisement
BZ vs IEMG
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BZ is a Hold and IEMG is a Buy.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
BZ’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
- BZ’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
| BZ | IEMG | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 79% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 80% | 3 days ago 86% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 88% | 3 days ago 83% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 81% | 3 days ago 85% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 79% | 3 days ago 81% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 76% | 3 days ago 78% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 75% | 3 days ago 82% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 18 days ago 79% | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 76% | 3 days ago 86% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 64% | 3 days ago 78% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| FRNW | 16.69 | 0.46 | +2.83% |
| Fidelity Clean Energy ETF | |||
| CALF | 41.41 | 0.21 | +0.51% |
| Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows 100 ETF | |||
| NFEB | 26.07 | 0.12 | +0.47% |
| Innovator Growth-100 Pwr Buffr ETF - Feb | |||
| DJP | 34.55 | -0.06 | -0.17% |
| iPath® Bloomberg Cmdty TR ETN | |||
| GCC | 20.08 | -0.07 | -0.35% |
| WisdomTree Enhanced Commodity Stgy Fd | |||
BZ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BZ has been loosely correlated with UPWK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 35% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BZ jumps, then UPWK could also see price increases.
IEMG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IEMG has been closely correlated with SCCO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IEMG jumps, then SCCO could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IEMG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IEMG | 100% | +0.50% | ||
| SCCO - IEMG | 74% Closely correlated | -0.22% | ||
| WB - IEMG | 62% Loosely correlated | +0.53% | ||
| HTHT - IEMG | 62% Loosely correlated | -0.24% | ||
| ATHM - IEMG | 60% Loosely correlated | -0.64% | ||
| BZ - IEMG | 60% Loosely correlated | +0.96% | ||
More | ||||