BYSD
Price
$0.72
Change
-$0.28 (-28.00%)
Updated
Jun 26 closing price
Capitalization
N/A
CINGF
Price
$0.34
Change
-$0.01 (-2.86%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Capitalization
2.1M
Interact to see
Advertisement

BYSD vs CINGF

Header iconBYSD vs CINGF Comparison
Open Charts BYSD vs CINGFBanner chart's image
Bayside
Price$0.72
Change-$0.28 (-28.00%)
Volume$217
CapitalizationN/A
Coinsilium Group
Price$0.34
Change-$0.01 (-2.86%)
Volume$12.12M
Capitalization2.1M
BYSD vs CINGF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BYSD
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CINGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BYSD vs. CINGF commentary
Jun 30, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BYSD is a Hold and CINGF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 30, 2025
Stock price -- (BYSD: $0.72 vs. CINGF: $0.34)
Brand notoriety: BYSD and CINGF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BYSD: 139% vs. CINGF: 480%
Market capitalization -- BYSD: $0 vs. CINGF: $2.1M
BYSD [@Packaged Software] is valued at $0. CINGF’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $2.1M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $3.15T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $12.72B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BYSD’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileCINGF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BYSD’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • CINGF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, CINGF is a better buy in the long-term than BYSD.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BYSD’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CINGF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BYSD’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • CINGF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CINGF is a better buy in the short-term than BYSD.

Price Growth

BYSD (@Packaged Software) experienced а -28.34% price change this week, while CINGF (@Packaged Software) price change was -53.42% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +3.15%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.92%, and the average quarterly price growth was +34.84%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (+3.15% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CINGF YTD gains are higher at: 609.072 vs. BYSD (-40.777).
BYSDCINGFBYSD / CINGF
CapitalizationN/A2.1M-
EBITDAN/A318K-
Gain YTD-40.777609.072-7%
P/E RatioN/A175.44-
RevenueN/A214K-
Total CashN/A173K-
Total DebtN/AN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BYSD vs CINGF: Fundamental Ratings
BYSD
CINGF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
26
Undervalued
83
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10064
SMR RATING
1..100
10065
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
9534
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
92
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BYSD's Valuation (26) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CINGF (83). This means that BYSD’s stock grew somewhat faster than CINGF’s over the last 12 months.

CINGF's Profit vs Risk Rating (64) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BYSD (100). This means that CINGF’s stock grew somewhat faster than BYSD’s over the last 12 months.

CINGF's SMR Rating (65) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BYSD (100). This means that CINGF’s stock grew somewhat faster than BYSD’s over the last 12 months.

CINGF's Price Growth Rating (34) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BYSD (95). This means that CINGF’s stock grew somewhat faster than BYSD’s over the last 12 months.

CINGF's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the null industry is in the same range as BYSD (9). This means that CINGF’s stock grew similarly to BYSD’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BYSDCINGF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
89%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
52%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
86%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
51%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
84%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
48%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
83%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
86%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
86%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BYSD
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CINGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
UEIC6.260.12
+2.04%
Universal Electronics
HBAN16.60-0.04
-0.24%
Huntington Bancshares
MSN0.39N/A
-0.39%
Emerson Radio Corp
VMEO4.01-0.05
-1.23%
Vimeo
MEOH34.14-0.68
-1.95%
Methanex Corp

BYSD and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BYSD and FNCHF have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BYSD and FNCHF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BYSD
1D Price
Change %
BYSD100%
N/A
FNCHF - BYSD
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CVOSF - BYSD
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SNOW - BYSD
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.31%
FORA - BYSD
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CLOQ - BYSD
8%
Poorly correlated
+7.69%
More

CINGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CINGF and VENZF have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CINGF and VENZF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CINGF
1D Price
Change %
CINGF100%
-4.23%
VENZF - CINGF
28%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SWONF - CINGF
20%
Poorly correlated
-2.06%
CMPD - CINGF
7%
Poorly correlated
+13.42%
CDTAF - CINGF
6%
Poorly correlated
-6.42%
BYSD - CINGF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More