| BYM | PZA | BYM / PZA | |
| Gain YTD | 4.824 | 1.112 | 434% |
| Net Assets | 310M | 3.28B | 9% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.49 | 0.28 | 532% |
| Turnover | 25.00 | 6.00 | 417% |
| Yield | 4.47 | 3.46 | 129% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 18 years | - |
| BYM | PZA | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 70% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 77% | 3 days ago 46% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 70% | 3 days ago 48% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 79% | 3 days ago 51% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 77% | 3 days ago 56% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 79% | 3 days ago 55% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 23 days ago 83% | 3 days ago 52% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 79% | 22 days ago 61% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 71% | 3 days ago 50% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 67% |
A.I.dvisor tells us that PZA and NIQ have been poorly correlated (+-6% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PZA and NIQ's prices will move in lockstep.