BYLTF
Price
$0.19
Change
-$0.01 (-5.00%)
Updated
Feb 3 closing price
Capitalization
29.66M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
CMBM
Price
$1.42
Change
-$0.05 (-3.40%)
Updated
Feb 4 closing price
Capitalization
40.11M
8 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

BYLTF vs CMBM

Header iconBYLTF vs CMBM Comparison
Open Charts BYLTF vs CMBMBanner chart's image
Baylin Technologies
Price$0.19
Change-$0.01 (-5.00%)
Volume$1K
Capitalization29.66M
Cambium Networks
Price$1.42
Change-$0.05 (-3.40%)
Volume$366.56K
Capitalization40.11M
BYLTF vs CMBM Comparison Chart in %
BYLTF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
CMBM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BYLTF vs. CMBM commentary
Feb 05, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BYLTF is a Hold and CMBM is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 05, 2026
Stock price -- (BYLTF: $0.19 vs. CMBM: $1.42)
Brand notoriety: BYLTF and CMBM are both not notable
Both companies represent the Telecommunications Equipment industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BYLTF: 6% vs. CMBM: 46%
Market capitalization -- BYLTF: $29.66M vs. CMBM: $40.11M
BYLTF [@Telecommunications Equipment] is valued at $29.66M. CMBM’s [@Telecommunications Equipment] market capitalization is $40.11M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Telecommunications Equipment] industry ranges from $320.67B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Telecommunications Equipment] industry is $10.1B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BYLTF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileCMBM’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • BYLTF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • CMBM’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, CMBM is a better buy in the long-term than BYLTF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BYLTF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CMBM’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BYLTF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • CMBM’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BYLTF is a better buy in the short-term than CMBM.

Price Growth

BYLTF (@Telecommunications Equipment) experienced а -4.38% price change this week, while CMBM (@Telecommunications Equipment) price change was -14.46% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Telecommunications Equipment industry was -1.07%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.84%, and the average quarterly price growth was +31.65%.

Reported Earning Dates

CMBM is expected to report earnings on Feb 13, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Telecommunications Equipment (-1.07% weekly)

The Telecommunications Equipment industry produces voice and data communications equipment, which includes fiber optic delivery products, digital signal processors, high-speed voice, data and video delivery. Additionally, satellite systems, global positioning systems, wireless data systems, personal communications equipment, telephone handsets and payload equipment for satellites also fall into this category. Apple Inc., QUALCOMM Incorporated and Nokia are major global players in this segment.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CMBM($40.1M) has a higher market cap than BYLTF($29.7M). BYLTF YTD gains are higher at: -0.848 vs. CMBM (-1.389). BYLTF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -1.05M vs. CMBM (-72.59M). CMBM has more cash in the bank: 46.5M vs. BYLTF (5.3M). BYLTF has less debt than CMBM: BYLTF (28.6M) vs CMBM (76.9M). CMBM has higher revenues than BYLTF: CMBM (172M) vs BYLTF (78.9M).
BYLTFCMBMBYLTF / CMBM
Capitalization29.7M40.1M74%
EBITDA-1.05M-72.59M1%
Gain YTD-0.848-1.38961%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue78.9M172M46%
Total Cash5.3M46.5M11%
Total Debt28.6M76.9M37%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BYLTF vs CMBM: Fundamental Ratings
BYLTF
CMBM
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3314
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
79
Overvalued
52
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
10099
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
7757
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
85n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CMBM's Valuation (52) in the null industry is in the same range as BYLTF (79). This means that CMBM’s stock grew similarly to BYLTF’s over the last 12 months.

CMBM's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as BYLTF (100). This means that CMBM’s stock grew similarly to BYLTF’s over the last 12 months.

CMBM's SMR Rating (99) in the null industry is in the same range as BYLTF (100). This means that CMBM’s stock grew similarly to BYLTF’s over the last 12 months.

CMBM's Price Growth Rating (57) in the null industry is in the same range as BYLTF (77). This means that CMBM’s stock grew similarly to BYLTF’s over the last 12 months.

CMBM's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as BYLTF (100). This means that CMBM’s stock grew similarly to BYLTF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BYLTFCMBM
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
44%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
39%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
36%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
86%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
31%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
88%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
48%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
88%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
37%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
88%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
73%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
88%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
44%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
88%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
11%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
63%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BYLTF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
CMBM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
STAG39.100.62
+1.61%
Stag Industrial
JDZG1.56N/A
N/A
Jiade Limited
GOOG333.34-7.36
-2.16%
Alphabet
CADL5.71-0.21
-3.55%
Candel Therapeutics
OCS26.37-1.78
-6.32%
Oculis Holding AG

BYLTF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BYLTF and VIAV have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BYLTF and VIAV's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BYLTF
1D Price
Change %
BYLTF100%
N/A
VIAV - BYLTF
28%
Poorly correlated
-5.33%
BEWFF - BYLTF
8%
Poorly correlated
+1.11%
UI - BYLTF
8%
Poorly correlated
-3.68%
AACAF - BYLTF
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CMBM - BYLTF
6%
Poorly correlated
-3.40%
More

CMBM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CMBM has been loosely correlated with LITE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CMBM jumps, then LITE could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CMBM
1D Price
Change %
CMBM100%
-3.40%
LITE - CMBM
34%
Loosely correlated
+7.00%
SYNX - CMBM
33%
Poorly correlated
-1.92%
CIEN - CMBM
29%
Poorly correlated
-8.32%
CMTL - CMBM
28%
Poorly correlated
-11.54%
VSAT - CMBM
28%
Poorly correlated
-9.88%
More