Advertisement
BYLOF vs RFNDF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BYLOF is a Hold and RFNDF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
BYLOF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileRFNDF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- BYLOF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- RFNDF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
BYLOF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RFNDF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- BYLOF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
- RFNDF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
Price Growth
BYLOF (@Miscellaneous Manufacturing) experienced а -2.11% price change this week, while RFNDF (@Specialty Telecommunications) price change was +2.28% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Miscellaneous Manufacturing industry was +0.31%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.88%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1.95%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Specialty Telecommunications industry was +0.31%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.73%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2.88%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Miscellaneous Manufacturing (+0.31% weekly)Miscellaneous manufacturing refers to a diverse range of products that cannot readily be categorized into other specific sectors of manufacturing. Major U.S. players in this industry include AMETEK, Inc.( analytical instruments, precision components and specialty materials), Dover Corporation (solutions for efficiency and safety of extracting oil and gas, e.g. rod lifts, progressing cavity pumps, gas lifts etc.; solutions for the transportation/transformation of solid waste; products for safe handling of critical fluids for various industries; systems for commercial-refrigeration, heating and cooling, and food and beverage packaging), and Carlisle Companies Incorporated (niche markets including commercial roofing, energy, lawn and garden, mining and construction equipment, aerospace and electronics, dining and food delivery, and healthcare), among others.
@Specialty Telecommunications (+0.31% weekly)Companies belonging to the specialty telecommunications sector provide voice and data transmission via a single method, such as fixed lines, digital subscriber lines (DSL), wireless technology, the internet or competitive local exchange carriers. Telefonica, Liberty Broadband Corp., and Zayo Group Holdings, Inc. are some of the big specialty telecom companies in the U.S.
| BYLOF | RFNDF | BYLOF / RFNDF | |
| Capitalization | 2.43B | 493M | 493% |
| EBITDA | 290M | 88.7M | 327% |
| Gain YTD | 0.276 | 27.850 | 1% |
| P/E Ratio | 8.83 | 15.51 | 57% |
| Revenue | 203M | 104M | 195% |
| Total Cash | 5.6M | N/A | - |
| Total Debt | 379M | N/A | - |
BYLOF | RFNDF | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 43 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 62 Fair valued | 20 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 98 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 75 | 86 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 61 | 42 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 63 | 12 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
RFNDF's Valuation (20) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BYLOF (62). This means that RFNDF’s stock grew somewhat faster than BYLOF’s over the last 12 months.
BYLOF's Profit vs Risk Rating (98) in the null industry is in the same range as RFNDF (100). This means that BYLOF’s stock grew similarly to RFNDF’s over the last 12 months.
BYLOF's SMR Rating (75) in the null industry is in the same range as RFNDF (86). This means that BYLOF’s stock grew similarly to RFNDF’s over the last 12 months.
RFNDF's Price Growth Rating (42) in the null industry is in the same range as BYLOF (61). This means that RFNDF’s stock grew similarly to BYLOF’s over the last 12 months.
RFNDF's P/E Growth Rating (12) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BYLOF (63). This means that RFNDF’s stock grew somewhat faster than BYLOF’s over the last 12 months.
| BYLOF | RFNDF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 47% | 3 days ago 47% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 55% | 3 days ago 41% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 50% | 3 days ago 38% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 55% | 3 days ago 38% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 54% | 3 days ago 32% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 50% | 3 days ago 26% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 57% | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 45% | 3 days ago 48% |
Advertisement
BYLOF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that BYLOF and RIOCF have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BYLOF and RIOCF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BYLOF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BYLOF | 100% | -0.34% | ||
| RIOCF - BYLOF | 31% Poorly correlated | +0.45% | ||
| CDPYF - BYLOF | 27% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| DREUF - BYLOF | 26% Poorly correlated | +0.51% | ||
| NWHUF - BYLOF | 23% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| KMMPF - BYLOF | 22% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||
RFNDF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that RFNDF and PAZRF have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that RFNDF and PAZRF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RFNDF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RFNDF | 100% | N/A | ||
| PAZRF - RFNDF | 27% Poorly correlated | +0.13% | ||
| EFRTF - RFNDF | 24% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| BYLOF - RFNDF | 20% Poorly correlated | -0.34% | ||
| SEGXF - RFNDF | 12% Poorly correlated | +1.72% | ||
| PRKWF - RFNDF | 9% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||