BYFC
Price
$6.05
Change
+$0.15 (+2.54%)
Updated
Dec 24 closing price
Capitalization
55.68M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
RF
Price
$27.73
Change
+$0.18 (+0.65%)
Updated
Dec 24 closing price
Capitalization
24.32B
22 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

BYFC vs RF

Header iconBYFC vs RF Comparison
Open Charts BYFC vs RFBanner chart's image
Broadway Financial
Price$6.05
Change+$0.15 (+2.54%)
Volume$23.15K
Capitalization55.68M
Regions Financial
Price$27.73
Change+$0.18 (+0.65%)
Volume$4.77M
Capitalization24.32B
BYFC vs RF Comparison Chart in %
BYFC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
RF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BYFC vs. RF commentary
Dec 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BYFC is a StrongBuy and RF is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 26, 2025
Stock price -- (BYFC: $6.05 vs. RF: $27.73)
Brand notoriety: BYFC: Not notable vs. RF: Notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BYFC: 565% vs. RF: 23%
Market capitalization -- BYFC: $55.68M vs. RF: $24.32B
BYFC [@Regional Banks] is valued at $55.68M. RF’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $24.32B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $171.46B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $8.64B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BYFC’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileRF’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • BYFC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • RF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, RF is a better buy in the long-term than BYFC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BYFC’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RF’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BYFC’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • RF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both BYFC and RF are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

BYFC (@Regional Banks) experienced а +5.30% price change this week, while RF (@Regional Banks) price change was +0.58% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.01%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.44%, and the average quarterly price growth was +15.56%.

Reported Earning Dates

RF is expected to report earnings on Jan 16, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.01% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RF($24.3B) has a higher market cap than BYFC($55.7M). BYFC has higher P/E ratio than RF: BYFC (173.00) vs RF (12.22). RF YTD gains are higher at: 21.740 vs. BYFC (-11.606). RF has more cash in the bank: 3.25B vs. BYFC (6.04M). BYFC has less debt than RF: BYFC (309M) vs RF (6.09B). RF has higher revenues than BYFC: RF (7.42B) vs BYFC (36.4M).
BYFCRFBYFC / RF
Capitalization55.7M24.3B0%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-11.60621.740-53%
P/E Ratio173.0012.221,416%
Revenue36.4M7.42B0%
Total Cash6.04M3.25B0%
Total Debt309M6.09B5%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BYFC vs RF: Fundamental Ratings
BYFC
RF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6922
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
100
Overvalued
62
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10028
SMR RATING
1..100
857
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
7922
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
162
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

RF's Valuation (62) in the Major Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BYFC (100) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that RF’s stock grew somewhat faster than BYFC’s over the last 12 months.

RF's Profit vs Risk Rating (28) in the Major Banks industry is significantly better than the same rating for BYFC (100) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that RF’s stock grew significantly faster than BYFC’s over the last 12 months.

RF's SMR Rating (7) in the Major Banks industry is significantly better than the same rating for BYFC (85) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that RF’s stock grew significantly faster than BYFC’s over the last 12 months.

RF's Price Growth Rating (22) in the Major Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BYFC (79) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that RF’s stock grew somewhat faster than BYFC’s over the last 12 months.

BYFC's P/E Growth Rating (1) in the Savings Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for RF (62) in the Major Banks industry. This means that BYFC’s stock grew somewhat faster than RF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BYFCRF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
62%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
65%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
56%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BYFC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
RF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
JOJO15.610.03
+0.17%
ATAC Credit Rotation ETF
FCLD30.090.04
+0.13%
Fidelity Cloud Computing ETF
MUNI52.530.05
+0.10%
PIMCO Intermediate Municipal Bd Actv ETF
HIX4.07-0.01
-0.25%
Western Asset High Income Fund II
WILD20.77-0.12
-0.59%
Vistashares Animal Spirits Daily 2X Strategy ETF

BYFC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BYFC and FITB have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BYFC and FITB's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BYFC
1D Price
Change %
BYFC100%
+2.63%
FITB - BYFC
28%
Poorly correlated
+0.25%
FITBI - BYFC
27%
Poorly correlated
+0.04%
MFG - BYFC
27%
Poorly correlated
-0.54%
RF - BYFC
26%
Poorly correlated
+0.65%
COLB - BYFC
26%
Poorly correlated
+0.03%
More

RF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RF has been closely correlated with FITB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RF jumps, then FITB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RF
1D Price
Change %
RF100%
+0.65%
FITB - RF
79%
Closely correlated
+0.25%
HBAN - RF
78%
Closely correlated
+0.06%
PNC - RF
78%
Closely correlated
+0.72%
MTB - RF
77%
Closely correlated
+0.40%
FNB - RF
76%
Closely correlated
+0.17%
More