BYFC
Price
$8.07
Change
-$0.19 (-2.30%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
51.13M
ONBPO
Price
$25.15
Change
+$0.07 (+0.28%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
N/A
Interact to see
Advertisement

BYFC vs ONBPO

Header iconBYFC vs ONBPO Comparison
Open Charts BYFC vs ONBPOBanner chart's image
Broadway Financial
Price$8.07
Change-$0.19 (-2.30%)
Volume$2.72K
Capitalization51.13M
Old National Ban
Price$25.15
Change+$0.07 (+0.28%)
Volume$2.23K
CapitalizationN/A
BYFC vs ONBPO Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BYFC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
ONBPO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BYFC vs. ONBPO commentary
Jul 28, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BYFC is a Buy and ONBPO is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 28, 2025
Stock price -- (BYFC: $8.07 vs. ONBPO: $25.15)
Brand notoriety: BYFC and ONBPO are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BYFC: 35% vs. ONBPO: 25%
Market capitalization -- BYFC: $51.13M vs. ONBPO: $0
BYFC [@Regional Banks] is valued at $51.13M. ONBPO’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.04B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BYFC’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileONBPO’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BYFC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • ONBPO’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, BYFC is a better buy in the long-term than ONBPO.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BYFC’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while ONBPO’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BYFC’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • ONBPO’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BYFC is a better buy in the short-term than ONBPO.

Price Growth

BYFC (@Regional Banks) experienced а -0.98% price change this week, while ONBPO (@Regional Banks) price change was +0.41% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.51%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.61%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.19%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.51% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BYFC YTD gains are higher at: 17.810 vs. ONBPO (5.451). ONBPO has more cash in the bank: 473M vs. BYFC (6.19M). BYFC has less debt than ONBPO: BYFC (224M) vs ONBPO (5.05B). ONBPO has higher revenues than BYFC: ONBPO (1.84B) vs BYFC (34.4M).
BYFCONBPOBYFC / ONBPO
Capitalization51.1MN/A-
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD17.8105.451327%
P/E Ratio10.21N/A-
Revenue34.4M1.84B2%
Total Cash6.19M473M1%
Total Debt224M5.05B4%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BYFC: Fundamental Ratings
BYFC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
32
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
91
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
77
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
41
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BYFCONBPO
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
84%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
12%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
18%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
27%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
27%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
25%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
29%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 18 days ago
78%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
22%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
32%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BYFC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
ONBPO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PRTS0.860.05
+6.11%
CarParts.com
AGNC9.710.09
+0.94%
AGNC Investment Corp
AVGO290.361.65
+0.57%
Broadcom Inc.
SKWD51.980.18
+0.35%
Skyward Specialty Insurance Group
VLN3.12N/A
N/A
Valens Semiconductor Ltd

BYFC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BYFC and CBSH have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BYFC and CBSH's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BYFC
1D Price
Change %
BYFC100%
-2.30%
CBSH - BYFC
24%
Poorly correlated
+0.42%
RF - BYFC
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.44%
HBNC - BYFC
22%
Poorly correlated
+1.10%
BMRC - BYFC
22%
Poorly correlated
-0.96%
ONBPO - BYFC
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.29%
More

ONBPO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ONBPO has been loosely correlated with ONBPP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 47% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ONBPO jumps, then ONBPP could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ONBPO
1D Price
Change %
ONBPO100%
+0.29%
ONBPP - ONBPO
47%
Loosely correlated
-0.19%
HBANL - ONBPO
46%
Loosely correlated
+0.88%
HBANP - ONBPO
35%
Loosely correlated
+0.28%
VLYPO - ONBPO
34%
Loosely correlated
-0.44%
TECTP - ONBPO
33%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More