BYFC
Price
$6.05
Change
+$0.15 (+2.54%)
Updated
Dec 24 closing price
Capitalization
55.68M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
MFG
Price
$7.42
Change
-$0.04 (-0.54%)
Updated
Dec 24 closing price
Capitalization
90.72B
35 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

BYFC vs MFG

Header iconBYFC vs MFG Comparison
Open Charts BYFC vs MFGBanner chart's image
Broadway Financial
Price$6.05
Change+$0.15 (+2.54%)
Volume$23.15K
Capitalization55.68M
Mizuho Financial Group
Price$7.42
Change-$0.04 (-0.54%)
Volume$2.98M
Capitalization90.72B
BYFC vs MFG Comparison Chart in %
BYFC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
MFG
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BYFC vs. MFG commentary
Dec 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BYFC is a StrongBuy and MFG is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 26, 2025
Stock price -- (BYFC: $6.05 vs. MFG: $7.42)
Brand notoriety: BYFC and MFG are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BYFC: 565% vs. MFG: 94%
Market capitalization -- BYFC: $55.68M vs. MFG: $90.72B
BYFC [@Regional Banks] is valued at $55.68M. MFG’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $90.72B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $171.46B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $8.64B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BYFC’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMFG’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • BYFC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • MFG’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, MFG is a better buy in the long-term than BYFC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BYFC’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MFG’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BYFC’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • MFG’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both BYFC and MFG are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

BYFC (@Regional Banks) experienced а +5.30% price change this week, while MFG (@Regional Banks) price change was +2.63% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.01%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.44%, and the average quarterly price growth was +15.56%.

Reported Earning Dates

MFG is expected to report earnings on Jan 30, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.01% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MFG($90.7B) has a higher market cap than BYFC($55.7M). BYFC has higher P/E ratio than MFG: BYFC (173.00) vs MFG (14.38). MFG YTD gains are higher at: 51.738 vs. BYFC (-11.606). BYFC has less debt than MFG: BYFC (309M) vs MFG (24.87T). MFG has higher revenues than BYFC: MFG (3.7T) vs BYFC (36.4M).
BYFCMFGBYFC / MFG
Capitalization55.7M90.7B0%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-11.60651.738-22%
P/E Ratio173.0014.381,203%
Revenue36.4M3.7T0%
Total Cash6.04MN/A-
Total Debt309M24.87T0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BYFC vs MFG: Fundamental Ratings
BYFC
MFG
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6913
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
100
Overvalued
71
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10011
SMR RATING
1..100
851
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
7941
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
124
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a90

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MFG's Valuation (71) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as BYFC (100) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that MFG’s stock grew similarly to BYFC’s over the last 12 months.

MFG's Profit vs Risk Rating (11) in the Major Banks industry is significantly better than the same rating for BYFC (100) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that MFG’s stock grew significantly faster than BYFC’s over the last 12 months.

MFG's SMR Rating (1) in the Major Banks industry is significantly better than the same rating for BYFC (85) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that MFG’s stock grew significantly faster than BYFC’s over the last 12 months.

MFG's Price Growth Rating (41) in the Major Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BYFC (79) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that MFG’s stock grew somewhat faster than BYFC’s over the last 12 months.

BYFC's P/E Growth Rating (1) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as MFG (24) in the Major Banks industry. This means that BYFC’s stock grew similarly to MFG’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BYFCMFG
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
47%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
45%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BYFC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
MFG
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ASHS37.970.37
+0.98%
Xtrackers Harvest CSI 500 CHN A SmCp ETF
TLH102.070.45
+0.44%
iShares 10-20 Year Treasury Bond ETF
MHD11.580.05
+0.43%
Blackrock Muniholdings Fund
CPNS27.25N/A
N/A
Calamos Nasdaq-100 Str Alt Prt ETF-Sep
NUSB25.20N/A
N/A
Nuveen Ultra Short Income ETF

BYFC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BYFC and FITB have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BYFC and FITB's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BYFC
1D Price
Change %
BYFC100%
+2.63%
FITB - BYFC
28%
Poorly correlated
+0.25%
FITBI - BYFC
27%
Poorly correlated
+0.04%
MFG - BYFC
27%
Poorly correlated
-0.54%
RF - BYFC
26%
Poorly correlated
+0.65%
COLB - BYFC
26%
Poorly correlated
+0.03%
More

MFG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MFG has been closely correlated with SUTNY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MFG jumps, then SUTNY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MFG
1D Price
Change %
MFG100%
-0.54%
SUTNY - MFG
71%
Closely correlated
N/A
HBAN - MFG
55%
Loosely correlated
+0.06%
NWG - MFG
54%
Loosely correlated
+0.51%
DB - MFG
54%
Loosely correlated
+0.41%
RF - MFG
53%
Loosely correlated
+0.65%
More