BYFC
Price
$7.05
Change
-$0.15 (-2.08%)
Updated
Nov 15, 10:30 AM (EDT)
HBNC
Price
$18.16
Change
-$0.31 (-1.68%)
Updated
Nov 15, 03:14 PM (EDT)
68 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

BYFC vs HBNC

Header iconBYFC vs HBNC Comparison
Open Charts BYFC vs HBNCBanner chart's image
Broadway Financial
Price$7.05
Change-$0.15 (-2.08%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
Horizon Ban
Price$18.16
Change-$0.31 (-1.68%)
Volume$200
CapitalizationN/A
BYFC vs HBNC Comparison Chart
Loading...
HBNC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BYFC vs. HBNC commentary
Nov 15, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BYFC is a Hold and HBNC is a StrongBuy.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 15, 2024
Stock price -- (BYFC: $7.20 vs. HBNC: $18.47)
Brand notoriety: BYFC and HBNC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BYFC: 7% vs. HBNC: 115%
Market capitalization -- BYFC: $51.13M vs. HBNC: $548.3M
BYFC [@Regional Banks] is valued at $51.13M. HBNC’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $548.3M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $5.86B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BYFC’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileHBNC’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • BYFC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • HBNC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, both BYFC and HBNC are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

HBNC’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • HBNC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.

Price Growth

BYFC (@Regional Banks) experienced а +7.46% price change this week, while HBNC (@Regional Banks) price change was +4.23% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.23%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.70%, and the average quarterly price growth was +17.76%.

Reported Earning Dates

BYFC is expected to report earnings on Nov 09, 2023.

HBNC is expected to report earnings on Jan 22, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.23% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBNC($548M) has a higher market cap than BYFC($51.1M). HBNC has higher P/E ratio than BYFC: HBNC (19.42) vs BYFC (10.21). HBNC YTD gains are higher at: 35.510 vs. BYFC (6.090). BYFC has less debt than HBNC: BYFC (224M) vs HBNC (900M). HBNC has higher revenues than BYFC: HBNC (183M) vs BYFC (34.4M).
BYFCHBNCBYFC / HBNC
Capitalization51.1M548M9%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD6.09035.51017%
P/E Ratio10.2119.4253%
Revenue34.4M183M19%
Total Cash6.19MN/A-
Total Debt224M900M25%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BYFC vs HBNC: Fundamental Ratings
BYFC
HBNC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
211
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
5
Undervalued
70
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10068
SMR RATING
1..100
6924
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3837
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
193
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a75

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BYFC's Valuation (5) in the Savings Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HBNC (70) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that BYFC’s stock grew somewhat faster than HBNC’s over the last 12 months.

HBNC's Profit vs Risk Rating (68) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as BYFC (100) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that HBNC’s stock grew similarly to BYFC’s over the last 12 months.

HBNC's SMR Rating (24) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BYFC (69) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that HBNC’s stock grew somewhat faster than BYFC’s over the last 12 months.

HBNC's Price Growth Rating (37) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as BYFC (38) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that HBNC’s stock grew similarly to BYFC’s over the last 12 months.

HBNC's P/E Growth Rating (3) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as BYFC (19) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that HBNC’s stock grew similarly to BYFC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
HBNC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
64%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
68%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
HBNC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GME27.370.91
+3.44%
GameStop Corp
AAPL228.223.10
+1.38%
Apple
SPY593.35-3.84
-0.64%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
BTC.X87250.430000-3333.734400
-3.68%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
TSLA311.18-19.06
-5.77%
Tesla

BYFC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BYFC and CBSH have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BYFC and CBSH's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BYFC
1D Price
Change %
BYFC100%
-3.23%
CBSH - BYFC
24%
Poorly correlated
-0.36%
HBNC - BYFC
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.16%
BMRC - BYFC
22%
Poorly correlated
+1.41%
BCOW - BYFC
22%
Poorly correlated
-0.50%
HNVR - BYFC
22%
Poorly correlated
-1.36%
More

HBNC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HBNC has been closely correlated with UBSI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 87% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HBNC jumps, then UBSI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HBNC
1D Price
Change %
HBNC100%
+0.16%
UBSI - HBNC
87%
Closely correlated
-0.56%
WASH - HBNC
87%
Closely correlated
-0.71%
SSB - HBNC
86%
Closely correlated
-0.34%
WSBC - HBNC
86%
Closely correlated
-0.22%
SHBI - HBNC
86%
Closely correlated
+0.06%
More