BYAH
Price
$0.08
Change
-$0.37 (-82.22%)
Updated
Feb 3, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
4.35M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
PG
Price
$155.33
Change
+$4.75 (+3.15%)
Updated
Feb 3, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
356.01B
73 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

BYAH vs PG

Header iconBYAH vs PG Comparison
Open Charts BYAH vs PGBanner chart's image
Park Ha Biological Technology
Price$0.08
Change-$0.37 (-82.22%)
Volume$1.6K
Capitalization4.35M
Procter & Gamble
Price$155.33
Change+$4.75 (+3.15%)
Volume$36.42K
Capitalization356.01B
BYAH vs PG Comparison Chart in %
BYAH
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
PG
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BYAH vs. PG commentary
Feb 04, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BYAH is a Buy and PG is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 04, 2026
Stock price -- (BYAH: $0.08 vs. PG: $153.19)
Brand notoriety: BYAH: Not notable vs. PG: Notable
Both companies represent the Household/Personal Care industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BYAH: 82% vs. PG: 93%
Market capitalization -- BYAH: $4.35M vs. PG: $356.01B
BYAH [@Household/Personal Care] is valued at $4.35M. PG’s [@Household/Personal Care] market capitalization is $356.01B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Household/Personal Care] industry ranges from $356.01B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Household/Personal Care] industry is $20.94B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BYAH’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whilePG’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • BYAH’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • PG’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, PG is a better buy in the long-term than BYAH.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BYAH’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PG’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BYAH’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • PG’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PG is a better buy in the short-term than BYAH.

Price Growth

BYAH (@Household/Personal Care) experienced а -46.58% price change this week, while PG (@Household/Personal Care) price change was +2.48% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Household/Personal Care industry was +0.23%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.21%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.57%.

Reported Earning Dates

PG is expected to report earnings on Apr 17, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Household/Personal Care (+0.23% weekly)

Household/Personal Care companies sell products for home cleaning and/or personal hygiene and grooming purposes. Products of this industry include detergents, shampoos, soaps, cosmetics, fabric conditioners and infant care fragrances. Procter & Gamble, Unilever, Estee Lauder and Colgate-Palmolive are some of the biggest names in the business. A lot of the products become a necessary part of people’s daily routine, and therefore the industry is relatively less vulnerable to macroeconomic downturns. At the same time, product quality, consumer safety, and ease of use are extremely critical factors for a company to survive competition and earn recognition in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PG($356B) has a higher market cap than BYAH($4.35M). PG YTD gains are higher at: 7.653 vs. BYAH (-50.880).
BYAHPGBYAH / PG
Capitalization4.35M356B0%
EBITDAN/A24.5B-
Gain YTD-50.8807.653-665%
P/E RatioN/A22.69-
RevenueN/A85.3B-
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total DebtN/A35.9B-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BYAH vs PG: Fundamental Ratings
BYAH
PG
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2910
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
76
Overvalued
45
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10053
SMR RATING
1..100
10095
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
9854
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9971
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

PG's Valuation (45) in the Household Or Personal Care industry is in the same range as BYAH (76) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry. This means that PG’s stock grew similarly to BYAH’s over the last 12 months.

PG's Profit vs Risk Rating (53) in the Household Or Personal Care industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BYAH (100) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry. This means that PG’s stock grew somewhat faster than BYAH’s over the last 12 months.

PG's SMR Rating (95) in the Household Or Personal Care industry is in the same range as BYAH (100) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry. This means that PG’s stock grew similarly to BYAH’s over the last 12 months.

PG's Price Growth Rating (54) in the Household Or Personal Care industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BYAH (98) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry. This means that PG’s stock grew somewhat faster than BYAH’s over the last 12 months.

PG's P/E Growth Rating (71) in the Household Or Personal Care industry is in the same range as BYAH (99) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry. This means that PG’s stock grew similarly to BYAH’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BYAHPG
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
38%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
23%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
44%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
46%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
43%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
41%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
35%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
43%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
41%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
33%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
38%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
26%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BYAH
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
PG
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AIM1.210.06
+5.22%
AIM ImmunoTech Inc.
POWI46.520.58
+1.26%
Power Integrations
CTNM14.380.12
+0.84%
Contineum Therapeutics
ARAY0.80-0.01
-0.73%
Accuray
ZG61.75-0.49
-0.79%
Zillow Group

BYAH and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BYAH and PG have been poorly correlated (+7% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BYAH and PG's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BYAH
1D Price
Change %
BYAH100%
-11.35%
PG - BYAH
7%
Poorly correlated
+0.94%
CL - BYAH
5%
Poorly correlated
+1.77%
EL - BYAH
2%
Poorly correlated
+3.02%
KMB - BYAH
1%
Poorly correlated
-0.49%
UNLYF - BYAH
-2%
Poorly correlated
+2.20%
More

PG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PG has been closely correlated with CL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PG jumps, then CL could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PG
1D Price
Change %
PG100%
+0.94%
CL - PG
79%
Closely correlated
+1.77%
KMB - PG
73%
Closely correlated
-0.49%
CHD - PG
69%
Closely correlated
+1.13%
UL - PG
59%
Loosely correlated
+0.60%
CLX - PG
56%
Loosely correlated
+0.44%
More