BYAGF
Price
$0.50
Change
-$0.01 (-1.96%)
Updated
Sep 25 closing price
Capitalization
189.75M
PUCCF
Price
$0.08
Change
-$0.01 (-11.11%)
Updated
Sep 24 closing price
Capitalization
5.12M
Interact to see
Advertisement

BYAGF vs PUCCF

Header iconBYAGF vs PUCCF Comparison
Open Charts BYAGF vs PUCCFBanner chart's image
Banyan Gold
Price$0.50
Change-$0.01 (-1.96%)
Volume$469.26K
Capitalization189.75M
CAROLINA RUSH
Price$0.08
Change-$0.01 (-11.11%)
Volume$50.34K
Capitalization5.12M
BYAGF vs PUCCF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BYAGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PUCCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BYAGF vs. PUCCF commentary
Sep 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BYAGF is a Hold and PUCCF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 27, 2025
Stock price -- (BYAGF: $0.50 vs. PUCCF: $0.08)
Brand notoriety: BYAGF and PUCCF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BYAGF: 54% vs. PUCCF: 109%
Market capitalization -- BYAGF: $189.75M vs. PUCCF: $5.12M
BYAGF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $189.75M. PUCCF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $5.12M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $102.94B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $3.14B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BYAGF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whilePUCCF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • BYAGF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • PUCCF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, BYAGF is a better buy in the long-term than PUCCF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BYAGF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PUCCF’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BYAGF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • PUCCF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PUCCF is a better buy in the short-term than BYAGF.

Price Growth

BYAGF (@Precious Metals) experienced а -3.53% price change this week, while PUCCF (@Precious Metals) price change was -9.03% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +3.52%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +27.71%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6008.39%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+3.52% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BYAGF($190M) has a higher market cap than PUCCF($5.12M). BYAGF YTD gains are higher at: 289.767 vs. PUCCF (72.653). PUCCF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -2.14M vs. BYAGF (-3.43M). BYAGF has more cash in the bank: 17.9M vs. PUCCF (375K). PUCCF has higher revenues than BYAGF: PUCCF (3.86K) vs BYAGF (0).
BYAGFPUCCFBYAGF / PUCCF
Capitalization190M5.12M3,715%
EBITDA-3.43M-2.14M160%
Gain YTD289.76772.653399%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue03.86K-
Total Cash17.9M375K4,773%
Total DebtN/AN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BYAGF vs PUCCF: Fundamental Ratings
BYAGF
PUCCF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7689
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
47
Fair valued
93
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
51100
SMR RATING
1..100
94100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3537
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BYAGF's Valuation (47) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PUCCF (93). This means that BYAGF’s stock grew somewhat faster than PUCCF’s over the last 12 months.

BYAGF's Profit vs Risk Rating (51) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PUCCF (100). This means that BYAGF’s stock grew somewhat faster than PUCCF’s over the last 12 months.

BYAGF's SMR Rating (94) in the null industry is in the same range as PUCCF (100). This means that BYAGF’s stock grew similarly to PUCCF’s over the last 12 months.

BYAGF's Price Growth Rating (35) in the null industry is in the same range as PUCCF (37). This means that BYAGF’s stock grew similarly to PUCCF’s over the last 12 months.

BYAGF's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as PUCCF (100). This means that BYAGF’s stock grew similarly to PUCCF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BYAGFPUCCF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
74%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
79%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BYAGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PUCCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
POICX11.53N/A
N/A
Virtus Tactical Allocation C
VSQCX17.85N/A
N/A
Invesco MSCI World SRI Index C
IVNQX50.22-0.21
-0.42%
Invesco Nasdaq 100 Index R6
PRPPX15.79-0.10
-0.63%
Principal International Equity R3
RPMIX9.58-0.11
-1.14%
Royce Small-Cap Fund Instl

BYAGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BYAGF has been loosely correlated with PMDRF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BYAGF jumps, then PMDRF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BYAGF
1D Price
Change %
BYAGF100%
-0.55%
PMDRF - BYAGF
34%
Loosely correlated
N/A
ALVLF - BYAGF
33%
Poorly correlated
-8.09%
NSUPF - BYAGF
30%
Poorly correlated
+2.86%
CNL - BYAGF
30%
Poorly correlated
+1.72%
APRAF - BYAGF
29%
Poorly correlated
+4.73%
More

PUCCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that PUCCF and BYAGF have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PUCCF and BYAGF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PUCCF
1D Price
Change %
PUCCF100%
N/A
BYAGF - PUCCF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PAEKY - PUCCF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ELRRF - PUCCF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PMCOF - PUCCF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TINFF - PUCCF
-1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More