BYAGF
Price
$0.47
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 4 closing price
Capitalization
174.82M
MFGCF
Price
$1.30
Change
+$0.11 (+9.24%)
Updated
Sep 4 closing price
Capitalization
141.9M
Interact to see
Advertisement

BYAGF vs MFGCF

Header iconBYAGF vs MFGCF Comparison
Open Charts BYAGF vs MFGCFBanner chart's image
Banyan Gold
Price$0.47
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$1.63M
Capitalization174.82M
Mayfair Gold
Price$1.30
Change+$0.11 (+9.24%)
Volume$300
Capitalization141.9M
BYAGF vs MFGCF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BYAGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MFGCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BYAGF vs. MFGCF commentary
Sep 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BYAGF is a Hold and MFGCF is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 06, 2025
Stock price -- (BYAGF: $0.47 vs. MFGCF: $1.30)
Brand notoriety: BYAGF and MFGCF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BYAGF: 188% vs. MFGCF: 3%
Market capitalization -- BYAGF: $174.82M vs. MFGCF: $141.9M
BYAGF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $174.82M. MFGCF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $141.9M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $89.3B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $2.75B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BYAGF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileMFGCF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • BYAGF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • MFGCF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, BYAGF is a better buy in the long-term than MFGCF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BYAGF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MFGCF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BYAGF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • MFGCF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both BYAGF and MFGCF are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

BYAGF (@Precious Metals) experienced а +9.09% price change this week, while MFGCF (@Precious Metals) price change was +6.14% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +3.81%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +14.34%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4956.16%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+3.81% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BYAGF($175M) has a higher market cap than MFGCF($142M). BYAGF YTD gains are higher at: 262.791 vs. MFGCF (1.250). BYAGF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -3.43M vs. MFGCF (-12.87M). BYAGF has more cash in the bank: 17.9M vs. MFGCF (7.69M). BYAGF (0) and MFGCF (0) have equivalent revenues.
BYAGFMFGCFBYAGF / MFGCF
Capitalization175M142M123%
EBITDA-3.43M-12.87M27%
Gain YTD262.7911.25021,023%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash17.9M7.69M233%
Total DebtN/AN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BYAGF: Fundamental Ratings
BYAGF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
15
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
46
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
53
SMR RATING
1..100
94
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
34
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BYAGFMFGCF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
64%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 17 days ago
68%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BYAGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MFGCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
KCSIX13.890.16
+1.17%
Knights of Columbus Small Cap I
HRCUX66.840.68
+1.03%
Carillon ClariVest Capital Apprec R6
BMCCX18.900.17
+0.91%
BlackRock Advantage Large Cap Gr Inv C
VGENX48.380.05
+0.10%
Vanguard Energy Inv
RBCIX11.36-0.22
-1.90%
RBC China Equity I

BYAGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BYAGF has been loosely correlated with VITFF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 57% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BYAGF jumps, then VITFF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BYAGF
1D Price
Change %
BYAGF100%
-1.08%
VITFF - BYAGF
57%
Loosely correlated
N/A
PMDRF - BYAGF
34%
Loosely correlated
N/A
ALVLF - BYAGF
33%
Poorly correlated
+0.48%
FSXLF - BYAGF
31%
Poorly correlated
-3.83%
NSUPF - BYAGF
30%
Poorly correlated
-0.12%
More

MFGCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MFGCF and EMAUF have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MFGCF and EMAUF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MFGCF
1D Price
Change %
MFGCF100%
+8.91%
EMAUF - MFGCF
23%
Poorly correlated
-4.46%
VITFF - MFGCF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BYAGF - MFGCF
20%
Poorly correlated
-1.08%
SITKF - MFGCF
20%
Poorly correlated
-4.04%
ENDGF - MFGCF
20%
Poorly correlated
+0.98%
More