BYAGF
Price
$0.17
Change
-$0.01 (-5.56%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Capitalization
69.84M
MFGCF
Price
$1.20
Change
+$0.02 (+1.69%)
Updated
Jun 25 closing price
Capitalization
152.1M
Interact to see
Advertisement

BYAGF vs MFGCF

Header iconBYAGF vs MFGCF Comparison
Open Charts BYAGF vs MFGCFBanner chart's image
Banyan Gold
Price$0.17
Change-$0.01 (-5.56%)
Volume$771.87K
Capitalization69.84M
Mayfair Gold
Price$1.20
Change+$0.02 (+1.69%)
Volume$1.01K
Capitalization152.1M
BYAGF vs MFGCF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BYAGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MFGCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BYAGF vs. MFGCF commentary
Jun 30, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BYAGF is a Hold and MFGCF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 30, 2025
Stock price -- (BYAGF: $0.17 vs. MFGCF: $1.20)
Brand notoriety: BYAGF and MFGCF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BYAGF: 198% vs. MFGCF: 26%
Market capitalization -- BYAGF: $69.84M vs. MFGCF: $152.1M
BYAGF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $69.84M. MFGCF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $152.1M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.1B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BYAGF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileMFGCF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • BYAGF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • MFGCF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, BYAGF is a better buy in the long-term than MFGCF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BYAGF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MFGCF’s TA Score has 1 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BYAGF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • MFGCF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BYAGF is a better buy in the short-term than MFGCF.

Price Growth

BYAGF (@Precious Metals) experienced а +4.48% price change this week, while MFGCF (@Precious Metals) price change was -2.20% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +0.06%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +9.36%, and the average quarterly price growth was +54.26%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+0.06% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MFGCF($152M) has a higher market cap than BYAGF($69.8M). BYAGF YTD gains are higher at: 35.659 vs. MFGCF (-6.250). BYAGF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -2.8M vs. MFGCF (-21.02M). BYAGF has more cash in the bank: 6.21M vs. MFGCF (5.56M). BYAGF (0) and MFGCF (0) have equivalent revenues.
BYAGFMFGCFBYAGF / MFGCF
Capitalization69.8M152M46%
EBITDA-2.8M-21.02M13%
Gain YTD35.659-6.250-571%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash6.21M5.56M112%
Total DebtN/A0-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BYAGF: Fundamental Ratings
BYAGF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
67
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
34
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
70
SMR RATING
1..100
92
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
47
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BYAGFMFGCF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
89%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
60%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
66%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
84%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
84%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
69%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BYAGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MFGCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SMIZF7.25N/A
N/A
Melia Hotels International SA
HLEGF0.01N/A
N/A
HELIOS ENERGY LTD.
LTRCF3.35N/A
N/A
LOTTERY CORP LTD
IDEXF50.78-0.48
-0.94%
Industria de Diseno Textil Inditex SA
EGPLF0.09N/A
-2.36%
Eagle Plains Resources Ltd.

BYAGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BYAGF has been loosely correlated with VITFF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 57% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BYAGF jumps, then VITFF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BYAGF
1D Price
Change %
BYAGF100%
-4.11%
VITFF - BYAGF
57%
Loosely correlated
N/A
PMDRF - BYAGF
34%
Loosely correlated
N/A
ALVLF - BYAGF
33%
Poorly correlated
+6.47%
FSXLF - BYAGF
31%
Poorly correlated
-1.09%
NSUPF - BYAGF
30%
Poorly correlated
+0.15%
More

MFGCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MFGCF and ZCTSF have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MFGCF and ZCTSF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MFGCF
1D Price
Change %
MFGCF100%
N/A
ZCTSF - MFGCF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
EMAUF - MFGCF
23%
Poorly correlated
+1.09%
SBMCF - MFGCF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
VITFF - MFGCF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BYAGF - MFGCF
20%
Poorly correlated
-4.11%
More