BYAGF
Price
$0.26
Change
+$0.01 (+4.00%)
Updated
Aug 8 closing price
Capitalization
97.19M
FSXLF
Price
$0.27
Change
+$0.01 (+3.85%)
Updated
Aug 8 closing price
Capitalization
29.89M
Interact to see
Advertisement

BYAGF vs FSXLF

Header iconBYAGF vs FSXLF Comparison
Open Charts BYAGF vs FSXLFBanner chart's image
Banyan Gold
Price$0.26
Change+$0.01 (+4.00%)
Volume$516.21K
Capitalization97.19M
GREAT PACIFIC GOLD
Price$0.27
Change+$0.01 (+3.85%)
Volume$15.8K
Capitalization29.89M
BYAGF vs FSXLF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BYAGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FSXLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BYAGF vs. FSXLF commentary
Aug 11, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BYAGF is a Hold and FSXLF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 11, 2025
Stock price -- (BYAGF: $0.26 vs. FSXLF: $0.27)
Brand notoriety: BYAGF and FSXLF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BYAGF: 84% vs. FSXLF: 14%
Market capitalization -- BYAGF: $97.19M vs. FSXLF: $29.89M
BYAGF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $97.19M. FSXLF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $29.89M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $76.48B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $2.45B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BYAGF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileFSXLF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • BYAGF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • FSXLF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, BYAGF is a better buy in the long-term than FSXLF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BYAGF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FSXLF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BYAGF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • FSXLF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FSXLF is a better buy in the short-term than BYAGF.

Price Growth

BYAGF (@Precious Metals) experienced а +4.65% price change this week, while FSXLF (@Precious Metals) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +19.61%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.15%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4669.58%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+19.61% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BYAGF($97.2M) has a higher market cap than FSXLF($29.9M). BYAGF YTD gains are higher at: 101.550 vs. FSXLF (-23.990). BYAGF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -4.19M vs. FSXLF (-17.91M). BYAGF has more cash in the bank: 22.4M vs. FSXLF (1.8M). BYAGF (0) and FSXLF (0) have equivalent revenues.
BYAGFFSXLFBYAGF / FSXLF
Capitalization97.2M29.9M325%
EBITDA-4.19M-17.91M23%
Gain YTD101.550-23.990-423%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash22.4M1.8M1,248%
Total DebtN/AN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BYAGF: Fundamental Ratings
BYAGF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
40
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
82
SMR RATING
1..100
93
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
36
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BYAGFFSXLF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
86%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
77%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
79%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
78%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 18 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
79%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
87%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BYAGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FSXLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CCRZX15.800.15
+0.96%
Columbia Disciplined Core Inst
UGMVX11.860.07
+0.59%
Victory Global Managed Volatility
QDVSX18.860.11
+0.59%
FI Instl ESG Stck Fd for Ret Plns
MECDX15.870.06
+0.38%
NYLI Epoch Capital Growth Class A
BMDSX20.47-0.18
-0.87%
Baird Mid Cap Growth Investor

BYAGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BYAGF has been loosely correlated with VITFF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 57% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BYAGF jumps, then VITFF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BYAGF
1D Price
Change %
BYAGF100%
+1.96%
VITFF - BYAGF
57%
Loosely correlated
N/A
PMDRF - BYAGF
34%
Loosely correlated
N/A
ALVLF - BYAGF
33%
Poorly correlated
+0.18%
FSXLF - BYAGF
31%
Poorly correlated
+2.00%
NSUPF - BYAGF
30%
Poorly correlated
-3.37%
More

FSXLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FSXLF and VITFF have been poorly correlated (+33% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FSXLF and VITFF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FSXLF
1D Price
Change %
FSXLF100%
+2.00%
VITFF - FSXLF
33%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BYAGF - FSXLF
32%
Poorly correlated
+1.96%
KNTNF - FSXLF
26%
Poorly correlated
-0.06%
BRWXF - FSXLF
24%
Poorly correlated
-6.45%
NSRPF - FSXLF
23%
Poorly correlated
+2.07%
More