BY
Price
$29.20
Change
+$0.80 (+2.82%)
Updated
Dec 3 closing price
Capitalization
1.34B
49 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
MNSB
Price
$20.10
Change
+$0.38 (+1.93%)
Updated
Dec 3 closing price
Capitalization
150.68M
53 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

BY vs MNSB

Header iconBY vs MNSB Comparison
Open Charts BY vs MNSBBanner chart's image
Byline Ban
Price$29.20
Change+$0.80 (+2.82%)
Volume$196.22K
Capitalization1.34B
MainStreet Bancshares
Price$20.10
Change+$0.38 (+1.93%)
Volume$62.82K
Capitalization150.68M
BY vs MNSB Comparison Chart in %
BY
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
MNSB
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BY vs. MNSB commentary
Dec 04, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BY is a StrongBuy and MNSB is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 04, 2025
Stock price -- (BY: $28.38 vs. MNSB: $19.75)
Brand notoriety: BY and MNSB are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BY: 25% vs. MNSB: 89%
Market capitalization -- BY: $1.34B vs. MNSB: $150.68M
BY [@Regional Banks] is valued at $1.34B. MNSB’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $150.68M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $171.16B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $8.26B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BY’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMNSB’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • MNSB’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, BY is a better buy in the long-term than MNSB.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BY’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MNSB’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BY’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • MNSB’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BY is a better buy in the short-term than MNSB.

Price Growth

BY (@Regional Banks) experienced а +0.11% price change this week, while MNSB (@Regional Banks) price change was +1.65% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.92%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.06%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.89%.

Reported Earning Dates

BY is expected to report earnings on Jan 22, 2026.

MNSB is expected to report earnings on Jan 26, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.92% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BY($1.34B) has a higher market cap than MNSB($151M). MNSB has higher P/E ratio than BY: MNSB (14.13) vs BY (10.43). MNSB YTD gains are higher at: 11.539 vs. BY (-0.666). BY has more cash in the bank: 75.1M vs. MNSB (20.9M). MNSB has less debt than BY: MNSB (71.2M) vs BY (525M). BY has higher revenues than MNSB: BY (416M) vs MNSB (72.1M).
BYMNSBBY / MNSB
Capitalization1.34B151M886%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-0.66611.539-6%
P/E Ratio10.4314.1374%
Revenue416M72.1M577%
Total Cash75.1M20.9M359%
Total Debt525M71.2M737%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BY vs MNSB: Fundamental Ratings
BY
MNSB
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
42
Fair valued
50
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3470
SMR RATING
1..100
1986
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5555
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
576
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BY's Valuation (42) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as MNSB (50). This means that BY’s stock grew similarly to MNSB’s over the last 12 months.

BY's Profit vs Risk Rating (34) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MNSB (70). This means that BY’s stock grew somewhat faster than MNSB’s over the last 12 months.

BY's SMR Rating (19) in the Regional Banks industry is significantly better than the same rating for MNSB (86). This means that BY’s stock grew significantly faster than MNSB’s over the last 12 months.

BY's Price Growth Rating (55) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as MNSB (55). This means that BY’s stock grew similarly to MNSB’s over the last 12 months.

MNSB's P/E Growth Rating (6) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BY (57). This means that MNSB’s stock grew somewhat faster than BY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BYMNSB
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
48%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
59%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
67%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
62%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
58%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
63%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 28 days ago
58%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
48%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
37%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BY
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
MNSB
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ACSAF92.32N/A
N/A
ACS Actividades De Construccion Y Servicios SA
FUWAY30.00N/A
N/A
Furukawa Electric Co., Ltd.
AVNBF23.40N/A
N/A
AVON TECHNOLOGIES PLC
AMEGF0.35N/A
N/A
AMERICAN EAGLE GOLD CORP.
EVKRF0.02N/A
N/A
GRID BATTERY METALS INC.

BY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BY has been closely correlated with OSBC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 87% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BY jumps, then OSBC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BY
1D Price
Change %
BY100%
+0.07%
OSBC - BY
87%
Closely correlated
-0.47%
FMBH - BY
87%
Closely correlated
+0.34%
BFST - BY
87%
Closely correlated
-0.08%
UVSP - BY
86%
Closely correlated
+0.25%
TRMK - BY
86%
Closely correlated
-0.67%
More

MNSB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MNSB has been loosely correlated with BY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MNSB jumps, then BY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MNSB
1D Price
Change %
MNSB100%
+0.87%
BY - MNSB
62%
Loosely correlated
+0.07%
OBT - MNSB
60%
Loosely correlated
-0.46%
CWBC - MNSB
60%
Loosely correlated
-0.04%
BFST - MNSB
60%
Loosely correlated
-0.08%
HTB - MNSB
59%
Loosely correlated
-0.75%
More