BY
Price
$27.91
Change
+$0.12 (+0.43%)
Updated
Jul 22 closing price
Capitalization
937.28M
One day until earnings call
HIFS
Price
$248.60
Change
+$2.29 (+0.93%)
Updated
Jul 22 closing price
Capitalization
378.65M
Interact to see
Advertisement

BY vs HIFS

Header iconBY vs HIFS Comparison
Open Charts BY vs HIFSBanner chart's image
Byline Ban
Price$27.91
Change+$0.12 (+0.43%)
Volume$288.4K
Capitalization937.28M
Hingham Institution for Savings
Price$248.60
Change+$2.29 (+0.93%)
Volume$22.13K
Capitalization378.65M
BY vs HIFS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HIFS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BY vs. HIFS commentary
Jul 23, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BY is a Hold and HIFS is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 23, 2025
Stock price -- (BY: $27.91 vs. HIFS: $248.60)
Brand notoriety: BY and HIFS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BY: 108% vs. HIFS: 24%
Market capitalization -- BY: $937.28M vs. HIFS: $378.65M
BY [@Regional Banks] is valued at $937.28M. HIFS’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $378.65M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.04B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BY’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileHIFS’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • BY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • HIFS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, BY is a better buy in the long-term than HIFS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BY’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HIFS’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • HIFS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, HIFS is a better buy in the short-term than BY.

Price Growth

BY (@Regional Banks) experienced а +1.38% price change this week, while HIFS (@Regional Banks) price change was -6.97% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +1.32%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.86%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.34%.

Reported Earning Dates

BY is expected to report earnings on Jul 24, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+1.32% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BY($937M) has a higher market cap than HIFS($379M). HIFS has higher P/E ratio than BY: HIFS (14.46) vs BY (7.91). HIFS YTD gains are higher at: -1.696 vs. BY (-3.051). BY has more cash in the bank: 71.2M vs. HIFS (6.76M). BY has less debt than HIFS: BY (513M) vs HIFS (1.47B). BY has higher revenues than HIFS: BY (384M) vs HIFS (64.6M).
BYHIFSBY / HIFS
Capitalization937M379M247%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-3.051-1.696180%
P/E Ratio7.9114.4655%
Revenue384M64.6M594%
Total Cash71.2M6.76M1,053%
Total Debt513M1.47B35%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BY vs HIFS: Fundamental Ratings
BY
HIFS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1873
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
57
Fair valued
78
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2972
SMR RATING
1..100
1551
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5052
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5253
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
3n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BY's Valuation (57) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as HIFS (78) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that BY’s stock grew similarly to HIFS’s over the last 12 months.

BY's Profit vs Risk Rating (29) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HIFS (72) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that BY’s stock grew somewhat faster than HIFS’s over the last 12 months.

BY's SMR Rating (15) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HIFS (51) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that BY’s stock grew somewhat faster than HIFS’s over the last 12 months.

BY's Price Growth Rating (50) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as HIFS (52) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that BY’s stock grew similarly to HIFS’s over the last 12 months.

BY's P/E Growth Rating (52) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as HIFS (53) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that BY’s stock grew similarly to HIFS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BYHIFS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
52%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
57%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
57%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
47%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
53%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
54%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
62%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
60%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
62%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
61%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
61%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
61%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
57%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
51%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
61%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HIFS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RYEIX249.102.93
+1.19%
Rydex Energy Inv
PDEZX19.250.09
+0.47%
PGIM Jennison Emerging Markets Eq Opps Z
HCMQX20.120.03
+0.15%
HCM Sector Plus I
FCASX29.58N/A
N/A
Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 70% C
EMECX11.89-0.05
-0.42%
Ashmore Emerging Markets Equity C

BY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BY has been closely correlated with TRMK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 90% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BY jumps, then TRMK could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BY
1D Price
Change %
BY100%
+0.43%
TRMK - BY
90%
Closely correlated
+0.52%
UBSI - BY
90%
Closely correlated
-0.13%
WSFS - BY
90%
Closely correlated
+0.17%
FULT - BY
89%
Closely correlated
-0.15%
HWC - BY
89%
Closely correlated
+0.75%
More

HIFS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HIFS has been closely correlated with TRMK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HIFS jumps, then TRMK could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HIFS
1D Price
Change %
HIFS100%
+0.93%
TRMK - HIFS
81%
Closely correlated
+0.52%
TCBK - HIFS
80%
Closely correlated
-0.66%
BY - HIFS
79%
Closely correlated
+0.43%
FCBC - HIFS
79%
Closely correlated
-0.37%
UBSI - HIFS
79%
Closely correlated
-0.13%
More