BY
Price
$27.65
Change
-$0.26 (-0.93%)
Updated
Jul 23, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
937.28M
One day until earnings call
FULT
Price
$19.26
Change
-$0.11 (-0.57%)
Updated
Jul 23, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
2.57B
90 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

BY vs FULT

Header iconBY vs FULT Comparison
Open Charts BY vs FULTBanner chart's image
Byline Ban
Price$27.65
Change-$0.26 (-0.93%)
Volume$3.44K
Capitalization937.28M
Fulton Financial
Price$19.26
Change-$0.11 (-0.57%)
Volume$25.07K
Capitalization2.57B
BY vs FULT Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FULT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BY vs. FULT commentary
Jul 24, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BY is a Hold and FULT is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 24, 2025
Stock price -- (BY: $27.91 vs. FULT: $19.37)
Brand notoriety: BY and FULT are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BY: 108% vs. FULT: 115%
Market capitalization -- BY: $937.28M vs. FULT: $2.57B
BY [@Regional Banks] is valued at $937.28M. FULT’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $2.57B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.04B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BY’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileFULT’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • BY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • FULT’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, FULT is a better buy in the long-term than BY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BY’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FULT’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • FULT’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FULT is a better buy in the short-term than BY.

Price Growth

BY (@Regional Banks) experienced а +1.38% price change this week, while FULT (@Regional Banks) price change was +1.84% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +1.25%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.37%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.54%.

Reported Earning Dates

BY is expected to report earnings on Jul 24, 2025.

FULT is expected to report earnings on Oct 21, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+1.25% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FULT($2.57B) has a higher market cap than BY($937M). FULT has higher P/E ratio than BY: FULT (9.54) vs BY (7.91). FULT YTD gains are higher at: 2.499 vs. BY (-3.051). FULT has more cash in the bank: 304M vs. BY (71.2M). BY has less debt than FULT: BY (513M) vs FULT (1.64B). FULT has higher revenues than BY: FULT (1.08B) vs BY (384M).
BYFULTBY / FULT
Capitalization937M2.57B36%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-3.0512.499-122%
P/E Ratio7.919.5483%
Revenue384M1.08B35%
Total Cash71.2M304M23%
Total Debt513M1.64B31%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BY vs FULT: Fundamental Ratings
BY
FULT
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1863
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
57
Fair valued
49
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2930
SMR RATING
1..100
1510
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5047
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5258
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
350

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FULT's Valuation (49) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as BY (57). This means that FULT’s stock grew similarly to BY’s over the last 12 months.

BY's Profit vs Risk Rating (29) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FULT (30). This means that BY’s stock grew similarly to FULT’s over the last 12 months.

FULT's SMR Rating (10) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as BY (15). This means that FULT’s stock grew similarly to BY’s over the last 12 months.

FULT's Price Growth Rating (47) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as BY (50). This means that FULT’s stock grew similarly to BY’s over the last 12 months.

BY's P/E Growth Rating (52) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FULT (58). This means that BY’s stock grew similarly to FULT’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BYFULT
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
47%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
62%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
51%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
52%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FULT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GSNPX20.860.21
+1.02%
Goldman Sachs International Eq Inc P
MLNCX24.69N/A
N/A
Morgan Stanley Instl Glbl Concntr C
IYIGX38.29-0.11
-0.29%
Macquarie Global Growth Fund Class R
AVEAX17.08-0.05
-0.29%
Ave Maria Growth Focused
JGACX31.19-0.15
-0.48%
JPMorgan Growth Advantage C

BY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BY has been closely correlated with TRMK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 90% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BY jumps, then TRMK could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BY
1D Price
Change %
BY100%
+0.43%
TRMK - BY
90%
Closely correlated
+0.52%
UBSI - BY
90%
Closely correlated
-0.13%
WSFS - BY
90%
Closely correlated
+0.17%
FULT - BY
89%
Closely correlated
-0.15%
HWC - BY
89%
Closely correlated
+0.75%
More

FULT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FULT has been closely correlated with ASB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 91% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FULT jumps, then ASB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FULT
1D Price
Change %
FULT100%
-0.15%
ASB - FULT
91%
Closely correlated
+0.59%
UBSI - FULT
91%
Closely correlated
-0.13%
HWC - FULT
91%
Closely correlated
+0.75%
UCB - FULT
91%
Closely correlated
-0.51%
FNB - FULT
90%
Closely correlated
+0.13%
More