BXSL
Price
$29.40
Change
-$0.19 (-0.64%)
Updated
Sep 3 closing price
Capitalization
6.75B
63 days until earnings call
INV
Price
$5.36
Change
+$0.27 (+5.30%)
Updated
Sep 3 closing price
Capitalization
298.62M
Interact to see
Advertisement

BXSL vs INV

Header iconBXSL vs INV Comparison
Open Charts BXSL vs INVBanner chart's image
Blackstone Secured Lending Fund
Price$29.40
Change-$0.19 (-0.64%)
Volume$1.13M
Capitalization6.75B
Innventure
Price$5.36
Change+$0.27 (+5.30%)
Volume$90.14K
Capitalization298.62M
BXSL vs INV Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BXSL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
INV
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BXSL vs. INV commentary
Sep 04, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BXSL is a Hold and INV is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 04, 2025
Stock price -- (BXSL: $29.40 vs. INV: $5.36)
Brand notoriety: BXSL and INV are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BXSL: 117% vs. INV: 37%
Market capitalization -- BXSL: $6.75B vs. INV: $298.62M
BXSL [@Investment Managers] is valued at $6.75B. INV’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $298.62M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $170.26B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $7.56B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BXSL’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileINV’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • BXSL’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • INV’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, BXSL is a better buy in the long-term than INV.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BXSL’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while INV’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BXSL’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • INV’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both BXSL and INV are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

BXSL (@Investment Managers) experienced а -1.47% price change this week, while INV (@Investment Managers) price change was +12.37% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was +0.53%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.99%, and the average quarterly price growth was +37.16%.

Reported Earning Dates

BXSL is expected to report earnings on Nov 06, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (+0.53% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BXSL($6.75B) has a higher market cap than INV($299M). BXSL YTD gains are higher at: -4.481 vs. INV (-61.300). BXSL has more cash in the bank: 197M vs. INV (6.97M). INV has less debt than BXSL: INV (45.3M) vs BXSL (7.09B). BXSL has higher revenues than INV: BXSL (662M) vs INV (1.47M).
BXSLINVBXSL / INV
Capitalization6.75B299M2,259%
EBITDAN/A-456.7M-
Gain YTD-4.481-61.3007%
P/E Ratio10.46N/A-
Revenue662M1.47M44,942%
Total Cash197M6.97M2,828%
Total Debt7.09B45.3M15,653%
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BXSLINV
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
11%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
42%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
22%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
36%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
31%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
36%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
23%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
40%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
18%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
42%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
18%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 17 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
32%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
45%
Bearish Trend 16 days ago
68%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
14%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
49%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
13%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BXSL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
INV
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MINBY18.820.37
+2.01%
Minebea Mitsumi Inc.
MAUSY10.82N/A
N/A
Matsui Securities Co. Ltd.
VOLAF29.49N/A
N/A
Volvo AB
VCCTF0.92-0.05
-5.57%
Victoria
SBMSF0.05N/A
-5.90%
Danakali Ltd.

BXSL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BXSL has been closely correlated with OBDC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 83% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BXSL jumps, then OBDC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BXSL
1D Price
Change %
BXSL100%
-0.64%
OBDC - BXSL
83%
Closely correlated
-0.07%
ARCC - BXSL
78%
Closely correlated
N/A
GSBD - BXSL
77%
Closely correlated
-0.18%
MAIN - BXSL
75%
Closely correlated
-0.23%
GBDC - BXSL
75%
Closely correlated
-0.61%
More

INV and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that INV and MAIN have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that INV and MAIN's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To INV
1D Price
Change %
INV100%
+5.30%
MAIN - INV
31%
Poorly correlated
-0.23%
ARES - INV
30%
Poorly correlated
-1.65%
SLRC - INV
29%
Poorly correlated
-0.60%
BXSL - INV
29%
Poorly correlated
-0.64%
KKR - INV
29%
Poorly correlated
-2.82%
More