BXSL
Price
$25.97
Change
-$0.50 (-1.89%)
Updated
Oct 16 closing price
Capitalization
5.98B
20 days until earnings call
Intraday Buy/Sell Signals
GSBD
Price
$9.68
Change
-$0.35 (-3.49%)
Updated
Oct 16 closing price
Capitalization
1.1B
20 days until earnings call
Intraday Buy/Sell Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

BXSL vs GSBD

Header iconBXSL vs GSBD Comparison
Open Charts BXSL vs GSBDBanner chart's image
Blackstone Secured Lending Fund
Price$25.97
Change-$0.50 (-1.89%)
Volume$2.31M
Capitalization5.98B
Goldman Sachs BDC
Price$9.68
Change-$0.35 (-3.49%)
Volume$682.81K
Capitalization1.1B
BXSL vs GSBD Comparison Chart in %
BXSL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GSBD
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BXSL vs. GSBD commentary
Oct 17, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BXSL is a Hold and GSBD is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 17, 2025
Stock price -- (BXSL: $25.97 vs. GSBD: $9.68)
Brand notoriety: BXSL and GSBD are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BXSL: 109% vs. GSBD: 91%
Market capitalization -- BXSL: $5.98B vs. GSBD: $1.1B
BXSL [@Investment Managers] is valued at $5.98B. GSBD’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $1.1B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $181.68B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $7.34B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BXSL’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileGSBD’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • BXSL’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • GSBD’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, BXSL is a better buy in the long-term than GSBD.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BXSL’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GSBD’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BXSL’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • GSBD’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BXSL is a better buy in the short-term than GSBD.

Price Growth

BXSL (@Investment Managers) experienced а +2.69% price change this week, while GSBD (@Investment Managers) price change was +1.47% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was -0.42%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.02%, and the average quarterly price growth was +19.92%.

Reported Earning Dates

BXSL is expected to report earnings on Nov 06, 2025.

GSBD is expected to report earnings on Nov 06, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (-0.42% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BXSL($5.98B) has a higher market cap than GSBD($1.11B). BXSL has higher P/E ratio than GSBD: BXSL (9.24) vs GSBD (7.74). GSBD YTD gains are higher at: -8.409 vs. BXSL (-13.131). BXSL has more cash in the bank: 197M vs. GSBD (108M). GSBD has less debt than BXSL: GSBD (1.8B) vs BXSL (7.09B). BXSL has higher revenues than GSBD: BXSL (662M) vs GSBD (161M).
BXSLGSBDBXSL / GSBD
Capitalization5.98B1.11B541%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-13.131-8.409156%
P/E Ratio9.247.74119%
Revenue662M161M411%
Total Cash197M108M182%
Total Debt7.09B1.8B394%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GSBD: Fundamental Ratings
GSBD
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
55
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
3
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
67
SMR RATING
1..100
25
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
63
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
94
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
75

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BXSLGSBD
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
27%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
72%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
47%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
49%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
52%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
33%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
52%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
33%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
54%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
48%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
46%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
39%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
50%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
47%
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
43%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
52%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
65%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
33%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BXSL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GSBD
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CGREX9.300.02
+0.22%
Invesco Global Real Estate C
GTDCX38.700.06
+0.16%
Invesco Emerging Markets ex-China C
RIDBX27.04-0.09
-0.33%
American Funds Income Fund of Amer R2
TMLCX39.74-0.24
-0.60%
SEI Tax-Managed Large Cap F (SIMT)
MBAIX32.02-0.24
-0.74%
NYLI Balanced Class I

BXSL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BXSL has been closely correlated with OBDC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 84% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BXSL jumps, then OBDC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BXSL
1D Price
Change %
BXSL100%
-1.85%
OBDC - BXSL
84%
Closely correlated
-2.56%
ARCC - BXSL
79%
Closely correlated
-2.59%
GBDC - BXSL
77%
Closely correlated
-1.51%
GSBD - BXSL
77%
Closely correlated
-2.42%
BCSF - BXSL
76%
Closely correlated
-2.36%
More

GSBD and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GSBD has been closely correlated with OBDC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 83% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if GSBD jumps, then OBDC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GSBD
1D Price
Change %
GSBD100%
-2.42%
OBDC - GSBD
83%
Closely correlated
-2.56%
BXSL - GSBD
76%
Closely correlated
-1.85%
CGBD - GSBD
75%
Closely correlated
-1.93%
MFIC - GSBD
73%
Closely correlated
-2.29%
GBDC - GSBD
72%
Closely correlated
-1.51%
More