BXRBF
Price
$7.00
Change
+$0.70 (+11.11%)
Updated
Dec 19 closing price
Capitalization
4.12B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
FSRL
Price
$12.83
Change
+$0.01 (+0.08%)
Updated
Jan 13 closing price
Capitalization
100.59M
7 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

BXRBF vs FSRL

Header iconBXRBF vs FSRL Comparison
Open Charts BXRBF vs FSRLBanner chart's image
Bendigo & Adelaide Bank
Price$7.00
Change+$0.70 (+11.11%)
Volume$800
Capitalization4.12B
First Reliance Bancshares
Price$12.83
Change+$0.01 (+0.08%)
Volume$1K
Capitalization100.59M
BXRBF vs FSRL Comparison Chart in %
BXRBF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
FSRL
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BXRBF vs. FSRL commentary
Jan 15, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BXRBF is a Hold and FSRL is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 15, 2026
Stock price -- (BXRBF: $7.00 vs. FSRL: $12.83)
Brand notoriety: BXRBF and FSRL are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BXRBF: 93% vs. FSRL: 12%
Market capitalization -- BXRBF: $4.12B vs. FSRL: $100.59M
BXRBF [@Regional Banks] is valued at $4.12B. FSRL’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $100.59M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $157.7B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $8.79B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BXRBF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileFSRL’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • BXRBF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • FSRL’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, BXRBF is a better buy in the long-term than FSRL.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BXRBF’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FSRL’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BXRBF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 0 bearish.
  • FSRL’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BXRBF is a better buy in the short-term than FSRL.

Price Growth

BXRBF (@Regional Banks) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while FSRL (@Regional Banks) price change was +1.83% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.97%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.18%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.82%.

Reported Earning Dates

FSRL is expected to report earnings on Jan 22, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.97% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BXRBF($4.12B) has a higher market cap than FSRL($101M). FSRL has higher P/E ratio than BXRBF: FSRL (12.10) vs BXRBF (11.37). FSRL YTD gains are higher at: 4.649 vs. BXRBF (0.000). FSRL has less debt than BXRBF: FSRL (34.8M) vs BXRBF (11.4B). BXRBF has higher revenues than FSRL: BXRBF (1.92B) vs FSRL (45.7M).
BXRBFFSRLBXRBF / FSRL
Capitalization4.12B101M4,081%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD0.0004.649-
P/E Ratio11.3712.1094%
Revenue1.92B45.7M4,190%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt11.4B34.8M32,759%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BXRBF vs FSRL: Fundamental Ratings
BXRBF
FSRL
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
4415
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
20
Undervalued
57
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
9044
SMR RATING
1..100
1157
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4643
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6964
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
3050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BXRBF's Valuation (20) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FSRL (57). This means that BXRBF’s stock grew somewhat faster than FSRL’s over the last 12 months.

FSRL's Profit vs Risk Rating (44) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BXRBF (90). This means that FSRL’s stock grew somewhat faster than BXRBF’s over the last 12 months.

BXRBF's SMR Rating (11) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FSRL (57). This means that BXRBF’s stock grew somewhat faster than FSRL’s over the last 12 months.

FSRL's Price Growth Rating (43) in the null industry is in the same range as BXRBF (46). This means that FSRL’s stock grew similarly to BXRBF’s over the last 12 months.

FSRL's P/E Growth Rating (64) in the null industry is in the same range as BXRBF (69). This means that FSRL’s stock grew similarly to BXRBF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BXRBFFSRL
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
30%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
25%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
48%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
39%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
33%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
10%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
36%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
9%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
53%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
46%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
56%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BXRBF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
FSRL
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SNOCX34.190.21
+0.62%
Easterly Snow Long/Short Opportunity C
CDDYX38.180.12
+0.32%
Columbia Dividend Income Inst3
RAIWX29.440.01
+0.03%
Manning & Napier Rainier Intl Discv W
KLCCX7.31-0.11
-1.48%
Federated Hermes Kaufmann Large Cap C
CSMMX20.48-0.32
-1.54%
Invesco Summit C

BXRBF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BXRBF has been loosely correlated with CMGGF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BXRBF jumps, then CMGGF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BXRBF
1D Price
Change %
BXRBF100%
N/A
CMGGF - BXRBF
64%
Loosely correlated
N/A
SFDL - BXRBF
31%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FSRL - BXRBF
28%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TCBS - BXRBF
27%
Poorly correlated
+0.58%
UBCP - BXRBF
22%
Poorly correlated
-0.98%
More

FSRL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FSRL and KTHAF have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FSRL and KTHAF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FSRL
1D Price
Change %
FSRL100%
N/A
KTHAF - FSRL
31%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BXRBF - FSRL
28%
Poorly correlated
N/A
EMYB - FSRL
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CHBH - FSRL
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MLGF - FSRL
24%
Poorly correlated
+1.36%
More