BXRBF
Price
$6.30
Change
+$0.52 (+9.00%)
Updated
Dec 20 closing price
Capitalization
3.78B
FNBT
Price
$43.05
Change
+$0.75 (+1.77%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
280.2M
Interact to see
Advertisement

BXRBF vs FNBT

Header iconBXRBF vs FNBT Comparison
Open Charts BXRBF vs FNBTBanner chart's image
Bendigo & Adelaide Bank
Price$6.30
Change+$0.52 (+9.00%)
Volume$897
Capitalization3.78B
FineMark Holdings
Price$43.05
Change+$0.75 (+1.77%)
Volume$47.54K
Capitalization280.2M
BXRBF vs FNBT Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FNBT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BXRBF vs. FNBT commentary
Jul 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BXRBF is a Buy and FNBT is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 07, 2025
Stock price -- (BXRBF: $6.30 vs. FNBT: $43.05)
Brand notoriety: BXRBF and FNBT are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BXRBF: 100% vs. FNBT: 168%
Market capitalization -- BXRBF: $3.78B vs. FNBT: $280.2M
BXRBF [@Regional Banks] is valued at $3.78B. FNBT’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $280.2M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.03B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BXRBF’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileFNBT’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • BXRBF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • FNBT’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, both BXRBF and FNBT are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FNBT’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • FNBT’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.

Price Growth

BXRBF (@Regional Banks) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while FNBT (@Regional Banks) price change was +4.24% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +2.86%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.84%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.71%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+2.86% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BXRBF($3.78B) has a higher market cap than FNBT($280M). FNBT has higher P/E ratio than BXRBF: FNBT (22.83) vs BXRBF (11.37). FNBT YTD gains are higher at: 62.147 vs. BXRBF (0.000). FNBT has less debt than BXRBF: FNBT (875M) vs BXRBF (12.6B). BXRBF has higher revenues than FNBT: BXRBF (2.03B) vs FNBT (92M).
BXRBFFNBTBXRBF / FNBT
Capitalization3.78B280M1,351%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD0.00062.147-
P/E Ratio11.3722.8350%
Revenue2.03B92M2,205%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt12.6B875M1,440%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BXRBF vs FNBT: Fundamental Ratings
BXRBF
FNBT
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
22
Undervalued
100
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2229
SMR RATING
1..100
1067
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
7335
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
717
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BXRBF's Valuation (22) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for FNBT (100). This means that BXRBF’s stock grew significantly faster than FNBT’s over the last 12 months.

BXRBF's Profit vs Risk Rating (22) in the null industry is in the same range as FNBT (29). This means that BXRBF’s stock grew similarly to FNBT’s over the last 12 months.

BXRBF's SMR Rating (10) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FNBT (67). This means that BXRBF’s stock grew somewhat faster than FNBT’s over the last 12 months.

FNBT's Price Growth Rating (35) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BXRBF (73). This means that FNBT’s stock grew somewhat faster than BXRBF’s over the last 12 months.

FNBT's P/E Growth Rating (7) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BXRBF (71). This means that FNBT’s stock grew somewhat faster than BXRBF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BXRBFFNBT
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
42%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
18%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
25%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
35%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
11%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
33%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
10%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
37%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
31%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
30%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
45%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FNBT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BAGAX14.630.22
+1.53%
Brown Advisory Growth Equity Adv
BLYYX35.270.43
+1.23%
American Beacon Man Lg Cp Growth Y
JDNNX76.620.68
+0.90%
Janus Henderson Growth And Income N
EIVCX14.050.06
+0.43%
Allspring Special Large Cap Value C
NWAHX22.740.05
+0.22%
Nationwide Janus Henderson Overseas R6

BXRBF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BXRBF has been loosely correlated with FABP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 33% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BXRBF jumps, then FABP could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BXRBF
1D Price
Change %
BXRBF100%
N/A
FABP - BXRBF
33%
Loosely correlated
N/A
FGFH - BXRBF
27%
Poorly correlated
-0.06%
HCBC - BXRBF
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MBKL - BXRBF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FNBT - BXRBF
21%
Poorly correlated
+1.77%
More

FNBT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FNBT and BRBS have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FNBT and BRBS's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FNBT
1D Price
Change %
FNBT100%
+1.77%
BRBS - FNBT
23%
Poorly correlated
+2.28%
MVLY - FNBT
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PBNK - FNBT
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BXRBF - FNBT
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FLEW - FNBT
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More