BXRBF
Price
$6.30
Change
+$0.52 (+9.00%)
Updated
Dec 20 closing price
Capitalization
3.78B
FGFH
Price
$31.08
Change
-$0.02 (-0.06%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
92.62M
Interact to see
Advertisement

BXRBF vs FGFH

Header iconBXRBF vs FGFH Comparison
Open Charts BXRBF vs FGFHBanner chart's image
Bendigo & Adelaide Bank
Price$6.30
Change+$0.52 (+9.00%)
Volume$897
Capitalization3.78B
Foresight Financial Group
Price$31.08
Change-$0.02 (-0.06%)
Volume$350
Capitalization92.62M
BXRBF vs FGFH Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FGFH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BXRBF vs. FGFH commentary
Jul 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BXRBF is a Buy and FGFH is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 07, 2025
Stock price -- (BXRBF: $6.30 vs. FGFH: $31.08)
Brand notoriety: BXRBF and FGFH are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BXRBF: 100% vs. FGFH: 19%
Market capitalization -- BXRBF: $3.78B vs. FGFH: $92.62M
BXRBF [@Regional Banks] is valued at $3.78B. FGFH’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $92.62M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.03B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BXRBF’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileFGFH’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BXRBF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • FGFH’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, BXRBF is a better buy in the long-term than FGFH.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FGFH’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • FGFH’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.

Price Growth

BXRBF (@Regional Banks) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while FGFH (@Regional Banks) price change was +0.95% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +2.12%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.03%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.71%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+2.12% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BXRBF($3.78B) has a higher market cap than FGFH($92.6M). BXRBF has higher P/E ratio than FGFH: BXRBF (11.37) vs FGFH (6.83). BXRBF YTD gains are higher at: 0.000 vs. FGFH (-4.620). FGFH has less debt than BXRBF: FGFH (17M) vs BXRBF (12.6B). BXRBF has higher revenues than FGFH: BXRBF (2.03B) vs FGFH (54.1M).
BXRBFFGFHBXRBF / FGFH
Capitalization3.78B92.6M4,084%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD0.000-4.620-
P/E Ratio11.376.83167%
Revenue2.03B54.1M3,750%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt12.6B17M74,118%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BXRBF vs FGFH: Fundamental Ratings
BXRBF
FGFH
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
22
Undervalued
18
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2259
SMR RATING
1..100
1046
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
7359
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
7153
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FGFH's Valuation (18) in the null industry is in the same range as BXRBF (22). This means that FGFH’s stock grew similarly to BXRBF’s over the last 12 months.

BXRBF's Profit vs Risk Rating (22) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FGFH (59). This means that BXRBF’s stock grew somewhat faster than FGFH’s over the last 12 months.

BXRBF's SMR Rating (10) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FGFH (46). This means that BXRBF’s stock grew somewhat faster than FGFH’s over the last 12 months.

FGFH's Price Growth Rating (59) in the null industry is in the same range as BXRBF (73). This means that FGFH’s stock grew similarly to BXRBF’s over the last 12 months.

FGFH's P/E Growth Rating (53) in the null industry is in the same range as BXRBF (71). This means that FGFH’s stock grew similarly to BXRBF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BXRBFFGFH
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
29%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
33%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
30%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
21%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
11%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
33%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
10%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
34%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
47%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
29%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
54%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FGFH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GSCOX27.400.31
+1.14%
Goldman Sachs Small Cap Gr Insghts C
MCSPX11.990.11
+0.93%
BlackRock Advantage SMID Cap Inv C
FCDAX36.680.27
+0.74%
Fidelity Advisor Stock Selector Sm Cp A
IGSIX12.420.07
+0.57%
Impax Global Social Leaders Inst
PJHRX29.830.06
+0.20%
PGIM Jennison Health Sciences R

BXRBF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BXRBF has been loosely correlated with FABP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 33% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BXRBF jumps, then FABP could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BXRBF
1D Price
Change %
BXRBF100%
N/A
FABP - BXRBF
33%
Loosely correlated
N/A
FGFH - BXRBF
27%
Poorly correlated
-0.06%
HCBC - BXRBF
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MBKL - BXRBF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FNBT - BXRBF
21%
Poorly correlated
+1.77%
More

FGFH and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FGFH and BXRBF have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FGFH and BXRBF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FGFH
1D Price
Change %
FGFH100%
-0.06%
BXRBF - FGFH
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SUGBY - FGFH
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
INBK - FGFH
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.68%
INFT - FGFH
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.43%
SLBK - FGFH
20%
Poorly correlated
+0.13%
More