It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
BXBLY’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileCBMJ’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
BXBLY’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
BXBLY (@Miscellaneous Commercial Services) experienced а -3.13% price change this week, while CBMJ (@Miscellaneous Commercial Services) price change was -36.00% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry was -2.54%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.07%, and the average quarterly price growth was -1.37%.
BXBLY is expected to report earnings on Oct 24, 2024.
The sector produces general business services, and are not classified elsewhere. For example, FleetCor Technologies provides fuel cards and workforce payment products and services; Copart, Inc. provides online vehicle auction and remarketing services across various nations; Equifax Inc. collects and aggregates credit information on consumers and businesses worldwide, along with selling credit monitoring and fraud-prevention services. Many of the companies in this category have multi-billion market capitalizations.
BXBLY | CBMJ | BXBLY / CBMJ | |
Capitalization | 13.1B | 137K | 9,562,044% |
EBITDA | 1.65B | -2.1M | -78,618% |
Gain YTD | 40.849 | 3.704 | 1,103% |
P/E Ratio | 21.93 | N/A | - |
Revenue | 5.72B | 0 | - |
Total Cash | 148M | 25.1K | 589,641% |
Total Debt | 2.88B | 205K | 1,402,927% |
BXBLY | CBMJ | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 51 | 60 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 19 Undervalued | 88 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 17 | 95 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 87 | 100 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 42 | 64 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 58 | 1 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
BXBLY's Valuation (19) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for CBMJ (88). This means that BXBLY’s stock grew significantly faster than CBMJ’s over the last 12 months.
BXBLY's Profit vs Risk Rating (17) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for CBMJ (95). This means that BXBLY’s stock grew significantly faster than CBMJ’s over the last 12 months.
BXBLY's SMR Rating (87) in the null industry is in the same range as CBMJ (100). This means that BXBLY’s stock grew similarly to CBMJ’s over the last 12 months.
BXBLY's Price Growth Rating (42) in the null industry is in the same range as CBMJ (64). This means that BXBLY’s stock grew similarly to CBMJ’s over the last 12 months.
CBMJ's P/E Growth Rating (1) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BXBLY (58). This means that CBMJ’s stock grew somewhat faster than BXBLY’s over the last 12 months.
BXBLY | |
---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago70% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago55% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago68% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago62% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago52% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago46% |
Advances ODDS (%) | N/A |
Declines ODDS (%) | N/A |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago56% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago40% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BXBLY has been loosely correlated with ALLE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 37% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BXBLY jumps, then ALLE could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BXBLY | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
BXBLY | 100% | -1.39% | ||
ALLE - BXBLY | 37% Loosely correlated | +0.35% | ||
BCO - BXBLY | 35% Loosely correlated | -1.84% | ||
CTAS - BXBLY | 31% Poorly correlated | -2.94% | ||
IKTSY - BXBLY | 29% Poorly correlated | -0.02% | ||
GHC - BXBLY | 26% Poorly correlated | -0.73% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor tells us that CBMJ and UNF have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CBMJ and UNF's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CBMJ | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
CBMJ | 100% | -8.01% | ||
UNF - CBMJ | 21% Poorly correlated | -1.01% | ||
DFCO - CBMJ | 12% Poorly correlated | -8.83% | ||
BVRDF - CBMJ | 11% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
CRWE - CBMJ | 10% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
BXBLY - CBMJ | 7% Poorly correlated | -1.39% | ||
More |