BX
Price
$169.99
Change
+$0.09 (+0.05%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
132.69B
40 days until earnings call
OWL
Price
$17.79
Change
-$0.26 (-1.44%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
11.58B
54 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

BX vs OWL

Header iconBX vs OWL Comparison
Open Charts BX vs OWLBanner chart's image
Blackstone
Price$169.99
Change+$0.09 (+0.05%)
Volume$3.11M
Capitalization132.69B
Blue Owl Capital
Price$17.79
Change-$0.26 (-1.44%)
Volume$16.05M
Capitalization11.58B
BX vs OWL Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BX
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
OWL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BX vs. OWL commentary
Sep 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BX is a Buy and OWL is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 06, 2025
Stock price -- (BX: $169.99 vs. OWL: $17.79)
Brand notoriety: BX and OWL are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BX: 84% vs. OWL: 229%
Market capitalization -- BX: $132.69B vs. OWL: $11.58B
BX [@Investment Managers] is valued at $132.69B. OWL’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $11.58B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $170.21B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $7.57B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BX’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileOWL’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • BX’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • OWL’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, BX is a better buy in the long-term than OWL.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BX’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while OWL’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BX’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • OWL’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BX is a better buy in the short-term than OWL.

Price Growth

BX (@Investment Managers) experienced а -0.82% price change this week, while OWL (@Investment Managers) price change was -3.94% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was -0.32%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.76%, and the average quarterly price growth was +38.68%.

Reported Earning Dates

BX is expected to report earnings on Oct 16, 2025.

OWL is expected to report earnings on Oct 30, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (-0.32% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BX($133B) has a higher market cap than OWL($11.6B). OWL has higher P/E ratio than BX: OWL (161.73) vs BX (45.94). BX YTD gains are higher at: 0.741 vs. OWL (-21.179). OWL has less debt than BX: OWL (3.65B) vs BX (12.9B).
BXOWLBX / OWL
Capitalization133B11.6B1,147%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD0.741-21.179-4%
P/E Ratio45.94161.7328%
RevenueN/AN/A-
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt12.9B3.65B354%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BX: Fundamental Ratings
BX
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
70
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
29
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
27
SMR RATING
1..100
34
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
25
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
66
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BXOWL
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
55%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
64%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
39%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
60%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
61%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
66%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
77%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
67%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
69%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BX
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
OWL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
NBH10.090.24
+2.44%
Neuberger Berman Municipal Fund
EVYM48.510.47
+0.97%
Eaton Vance High Income Municipal ETF
DFNM47.710.17
+0.36%
Dimensional National Municipal Bond ETF
MMLG35.150.08
+0.22%
First Trust Multi-Manager Large Gr ETF
BNGE38.710.08
+0.21%
First Trust S-Network Strmng & Gmng ETF

BX and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BX has been closely correlated with KKR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BX jumps, then KKR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BX
1D Price
Change %
BX100%
+0.05%
KKR - BX
86%
Closely correlated
-1.33%
CG - BX
84%
Closely correlated
-1.82%
JHG - BX
82%
Closely correlated
-1.82%
BN - BX
81%
Closely correlated
-0.08%
OWL - BX
81%
Closely correlated
-1.44%
More

OWL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, OWL has been closely correlated with ARES. These tickers have moved in lockstep 87% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if OWL jumps, then ARES could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To OWL
1D Price
Change %
OWL100%
-1.44%
ARES - OWL
87%
Closely correlated
-1.52%
KKR - OWL
87%
Closely correlated
-1.33%
APO - OWL
84%
Closely correlated
-2.38%
CG - OWL
84%
Closely correlated
-1.82%
TPG - OWL
83%
Closely correlated
-0.85%
More