BWMN
Price
$40.79
Change
-$1.20 (-2.86%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
703.66M
60 days until earnings call
CSGQF
Price
$1.38
Change
+$0.03 (+2.22%)
Updated
Feb 25 closing price
Capitalization
467.96M
Interact to see
Advertisement

BWMN vs CSGQF

Header iconBWMN vs CSGQF Comparison
Open Charts BWMN vs CSGQFBanner chart's image
Bowman Consulting Group
Price$40.79
Change-$1.20 (-2.86%)
Volume$93.87K
Capitalization703.66M
Costain Group
Price$1.38
Change+$0.03 (+2.22%)
Volume$20K
Capitalization467.96M
BWMN vs CSGQF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BWMN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CSGQF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BWMN vs. CSGQF commentary
Sep 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BWMN is a Buy and CSGQF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 06, 2025
Stock price -- (BWMN: $40.79 vs. CSGQF: $1.38)
Brand notoriety: BWMN and CSGQF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Engineering & Construction industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BWMN: 65% vs. CSGQF: 100%
Market capitalization -- BWMN: $703.66M vs. CSGQF: $467.96M
BWMN [@Engineering & Construction] is valued at $703.66M. CSGQF’s [@Engineering & Construction] market capitalization is $467.96M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Engineering & Construction] industry ranges from $15.31T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Engineering & Construction] industry is $7.58B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BWMN’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileCSGQF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BWMN’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • CSGQF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, CSGQF is a better buy in the long-term than BWMN.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BWMN’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CSGQF’s TA Score has 1 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BWMN’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • CSGQF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 0 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CSGQF is a better buy in the short-term than BWMN.

Price Growth

BWMN (@Engineering & Construction) experienced а -4.54% price change this week, while CSGQF (@Engineering & Construction) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Engineering & Construction industry was -0.30%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.84%, and the average quarterly price growth was +201.92%.

Reported Earning Dates

BWMN is expected to report earnings on Nov 05, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Engineering & Construction (-0.30% weekly)

Engineering & Construction includes companies that engage in non-residential construction and contract services, including ventilation, heating and air conditioning (HVAC) services. The level/value of construction & engineering activity is one of the potentially relevant indicators of the health of businesses, and hence of the overall economy. Some of the large-cap U.S. companies in this industry include Jacobs Engineering Group Inc,, AECOM and Quanta Services, Inc.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BWMN($704M) has a higher market cap than CSGQF($468M). BWMN has higher P/E ratio than CSGQF: BWMN (62.75) vs CSGQF (9.23). BWMN YTD gains are higher at: 63.487 vs. CSGQF (1.852).
BWMNCSGQFBWMN / CSGQF
Capitalization704M468M150%
EBITDA40.4MN/A-
Gain YTD63.4871.8523,428%
P/E Ratio62.759.23680%
Revenue462MN/A-
Total Cash15.5MN/A-
Total Debt172MN/A-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BWMNCSGQF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
55%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
20%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
68%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
84%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
59%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
12%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
12%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
78%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
55%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
84%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BWMN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CSGQF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FHEIX17.040.10
+0.60%
Fidelity Advisor Real Estate I
GTSIX33.630.15
+0.45%
Invesco Small Cap Growth Inv
JCVWX25.99N/A
N/A
JHancock Classic Value R6
APFWX10.90N/A
N/A
Artisan Value Income Investor
MRGAX55.27-0.04
-0.07%
MFS Core Equity A

BWMN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BWMN has been loosely correlated with GVA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 52% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BWMN jumps, then GVA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BWMN
1D Price
Change %
BWMN100%
-2.86%
GVA - BWMN
52%
Loosely correlated
-0.20%
MTZ - BWMN
48%
Loosely correlated
-2.47%
PRIM - BWMN
46%
Loosely correlated
-0.23%
STRL - BWMN
46%
Loosely correlated
-0.94%
FIX - BWMN
46%
Loosely correlated
-2.44%
More

CSGQF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CSGQF and DNERF have been poorly correlated (+1% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CSGQF and DNERF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CSGQF
1D Price
Change %
CSGQF100%
N/A
DNERF - CSGQF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
KYWAF - CSGQF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BWMN - CSGQF
-0%
Poorly correlated
-2.86%
CADLF - CSGQF
-1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ELWSF - CSGQF
-1%
Poorly correlated
+0.37%
More