BWMN
Price
$20.78
Change
-$0.22 (-1.05%)
Updated
Feb 21 closing price
Capitalization
364.27M
16 days until earnings call
CSGQF
Price
$1.35
Change
+$0.25 (+22.73%)
Updated
Nov 1 closing price
Capitalization
367.75M
Ad is loading...

BWMN vs CSGQF

Header iconBWMN vs CSGQF Comparison
Open Charts BWMN vs CSGQFBanner chart's image
Bowman Consulting Group
Price$20.78
Change-$0.22 (-1.05%)
Volume$76.08K
Capitalization364.27M
Costain Group
Price$1.35
Change+$0.25 (+22.73%)
Volume$10.6K
Capitalization367.75M
BWMN vs CSGQF Comparison Chart
Loading...
BWMN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BWMN vs. CSGQF commentary
Feb 23, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BWMN is a Buy and CSGQF is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 23, 2025
Stock price -- (BWMN: $22.29 vs. CSGQF: $1.35)
Brand notoriety: BWMN and CSGQF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Engineering & Construction industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BWMN: 117% vs. CSGQF: 100%
Market capitalization -- BWMN: $364.27M vs. CSGQF: $367.75M
BWMN [@Engineering & Construction] is valued at $364.27M. CSGQF’s [@Engineering & Construction] market capitalization is $367.75M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Engineering & Construction] industry ranges from $15.31T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Engineering & Construction] industry is $5.79B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BWMN’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileCSGQF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • BWMN’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • CSGQF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, CSGQF is a better buy in the long-term than BWMN.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BWMN’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • BWMN’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.

Price Growth

BWMN (@Engineering & Construction) experienced а -5.55% price change this week, while CSGQF (@Engineering & Construction) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Engineering & Construction industry was -0.76%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -5.79%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.94%.

Reported Earning Dates

BWMN is expected to report earnings on May 12, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Engineering & Construction (-0.76% weekly)

Engineering & Construction includes companies that engage in non-residential construction and contract services, including ventilation, heating and air conditioning (HVAC) services. The level/value of construction & engineering activity is one of the potentially relevant indicators of the health of businesses, and hence of the overall economy. Some of the large-cap U.S. companies in this industry include Jacobs Engineering Group Inc,, AECOM and Quanta Services, Inc.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSGQF($368M) and BWMN($364M) have the same market capitalization . CSGQF YTD gains are higher at: 0.000 vs. BWMN (-10.661).
BWMNCSGQFBWMN / CSGQF
Capitalization364M368M99%
EBITDA18.9MN/A-
Gain YTD-10.6610.000-
P/E RatioN/A9.94-
Revenue406MN/A-
Total Cash11.7MN/A-
Total Debt144MN/A-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BWMN
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
82%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
84%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
72%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
71%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
66%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
67%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 25 days ago
77%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
69%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
77%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
71%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
BWMN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SPY611.491.79
+0.29%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
AAPL244.47-0.13
-0.05%
Apple
GME26.97-0.03
-0.11%
GameStop Corp
BTC.X95539.550000-233.835940
-0.24%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
TSLA354.11-1.73
-0.49%
Tesla

BWMN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BWMN has been loosely correlated with STRL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 41% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BWMN jumps, then STRL could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BWMN
1D Price
Change %
BWMN100%
-0.80%
STRL - BWMN
41%
Loosely correlated
-1.33%
BLD - BWMN
39%
Loosely correlated
-1.50%
APG - BWMN
38%
Loosely correlated
-0.11%
ROAD - BWMN
37%
Loosely correlated
+1.28%
GVA - BWMN
36%
Loosely correlated
+1.01%
More

CSGQF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CSGQF and DNERF have been poorly correlated (+1% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CSGQF and DNERF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CSGQF
1D Price
Change %
CSGQF100%
N/A
DNERF - CSGQF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
KYWAF - CSGQF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BWMN - CSGQF
-0%
Poorly correlated
-0.80%
CADLF - CSGQF
-1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ELWSF - CSGQF
-1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More