BWLP
Price
$12.52
Change
+$0.53 (+4.42%)
Updated
Dec 3 closing price
Capitalization
1.89B
84 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
ECO
Price
$36.26
Change
+$0.09 (+0.25%)
Updated
Dec 3 closing price
Capitalization
1.29B
85 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

BWLP vs ECO

Header iconBWLP vs ECO Comparison
Open Charts BWLP vs ECOBanner chart's image
BW LPG
Price$12.52
Change+$0.53 (+4.42%)
Volume$889.83K
Capitalization1.89B
Okeanis Eco Tankers
Price$36.26
Change+$0.09 (+0.25%)
Volume$269.88K
Capitalization1.29B
BWLP vs ECO Comparison Chart in %
BWLP
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
ECO
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BWLP vs. ECO commentary
Dec 04, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BWLP is a Buy and ECO is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 04, 2025
Stock price -- (BWLP: $11.99 vs. ECO: $36.12)
Brand notoriety: BWLP and ECO are both not notable
Both companies represent the Marine Shipping industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BWLP: 198% vs. ECO: 28%
Market capitalization -- BWLP: $1.9B vs. ECO: $1.26B
BWLP [@Marine Shipping] is valued at $1.9B. ECO’s [@Marine Shipping] market capitalization is $1.26B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Marine Shipping] industry ranges from $31.78B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Marine Shipping] industry is $4.9B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BWLP’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileECO’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • BWLP’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • ECO’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, ECO is a better buy in the long-term than BWLP.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BWLP’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while ECO’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BWLP’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • ECO’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both BWLP and ECO are a bad buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

BWLP (@Marine Shipping) experienced а -2.91% price change this week, while ECO (@Marine Shipping) price change was -2.01% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Marine Shipping industry was +16.44%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.72%, and the average quarterly price growth was +16.72%.

Reported Earning Dates

BWLP is expected to report earnings on Feb 26, 2026.

ECO is expected to report earnings on Feb 27, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Marine Shipping (+16.44% weekly)

The marine shipping industry provides passenger transportation or cargo shipping services via waterways. This industry includes freight towage, ferry services and warehousing on deep-sea and inland waterways. The aviation sector may have reduced the popularity of sea travel for several passengers, but it is still in demand for short trips and pleasure cruises. Teekay Offshore Partners L.P. Cum Red Perp Pfd., Kirby Corporation and Seaspan Corporation are some of the well-known names in the business.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BWLP($1.89B) has a higher market cap than ECO($1.29B). ECO has higher P/E ratio than BWLP: ECO (15.24) vs BWLP (11.28). ECO YTD gains are higher at: 79.756 vs. BWLP (14.306). BWLP has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 565M vs. ECO (155M). BWLP has more cash in the bank: 323M vs. ECO (59.8M). ECO has less debt than BWLP: ECO (631M) vs BWLP (1.13B). BWLP has higher revenues than ECO: BWLP (3.56B) vs ECO (344M).
BWLPECOBWLP / ECO
Capitalization1.89B1.29B146%
EBITDA565M155M365%
Gain YTD14.30679.75618%
P/E Ratio11.2815.2474%
Revenue3.56B344M1,033%
Total Cash323M59.8M540%
Total Debt1.13B631M180%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BWLP: Fundamental Ratings
BWLP
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
4
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
42
SMR RATING
1..100
59
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
58
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BWLPECO
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
68%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
82%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
53%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
39%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
50%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
53%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 17 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 16 days ago
72%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
54%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
50%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
64%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BWLP
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
ECO
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MLRMX10.24N/A
N/A
NYLI Winslow Large Cap Growth SIMPLE Cl
SWASX6.79N/A
N/A
Schwab Global Real Estate
GSCTX14.58N/A
N/A
Goldman Sachs Small Cp Val Insghts C
FIKYX14.25N/A
N/A
Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 40% Z
JESSX17.64N/A
N/A
Janus Henderson Global Sust Eq S

BWLP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BWLP has been loosely correlated with NMM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 58% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BWLP jumps, then NMM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BWLP
1D Price
Change %
BWLP100%
-4.31%
NMM - BWLP
58%
Loosely correlated
+1.21%
HAFN - BWLP
58%
Loosely correlated
+1.21%
ECO - BWLP
57%
Loosely correlated
-1.12%
GNK - BWLP
56%
Loosely correlated
-0.11%
SB - BWLP
56%
Loosely correlated
+0.57%
More

ECO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ECO has been closely correlated with NAT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ECO jumps, then NAT could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ECO
1D Price
Change %
ECO100%
-1.12%
NAT - ECO
73%
Closely correlated
+0.51%
HAFN - ECO
70%
Closely correlated
+1.21%
ASC - ECO
65%
Loosely correlated
+0.21%
NMM - ECO
62%
Loosely correlated
+1.21%
BWLP - ECO
57%
Loosely correlated
-4.31%
More