BWLP
Price
$12.51
Change
-$0.21 (-1.65%)
Updated
Feb 21 closing price
Capitalization
1.9B
4 days until earnings call
ECO
Price
$21.96
Change
-$0.48 (-2.14%)
Updated
Feb 21 closing price
Capitalization
721.43M
80 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

BWLP vs ECO

Header iconBWLP vs ECO Comparison
Open Charts BWLP vs ECOBanner chart's image
BW LPG
Price$12.51
Change-$0.21 (-1.65%)
Volume$225.2K
Capitalization1.9B
Okeanis Eco Tankers
Price$21.96
Change-$0.48 (-2.14%)
Volume$685.43K
Capitalization721.43M
BWLP vs ECO Comparison Chart
Loading...
BWLP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
ECO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BWLP vs. ECO commentary
Feb 23, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BWLP is a StrongBuy and ECO is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 23, 2025
Stock price -- (BWLP: $13.02 vs. ECO: $24.46)
Brand notoriety: BWLP and ECO are both not notable
Both companies represent the Marine Shipping industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BWLP: 81% vs. ECO: 54%
Market capitalization -- BWLP: $1.9B vs. ECO: $721.43M
BWLP [@Marine Shipping] is valued at $1.9B. ECO’s [@Marine Shipping] market capitalization is $721.43M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Marine Shipping] industry ranges from $29.72B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Marine Shipping] industry is $4.61B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BWLP’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileECO’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • BWLP’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • ECO’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, BWLP is a better buy in the long-term than ECO.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BWLP’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while ECO’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BWLP’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • ECO’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, ECO is a better buy in the short-term than BWLP.

Price Growth

BWLP (@Marine Shipping) experienced а +0.62% price change this week, while ECO (@Marine Shipping) price change was +0.49% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Marine Shipping industry was -0.93%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.30%, and the average quarterly price growth was -5.25%.

Reported Earning Dates

BWLP is expected to report earnings on May 20, 2025.

ECO is expected to report earnings on May 14, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Marine Shipping (-0.93% weekly)

The marine shipping industry provides passenger transportation or cargo shipping services via waterways. This industry includes freight towage, ferry services and warehousing on deep-sea and inland waterways. The aviation sector may have reduced the popularity of sea travel for several passengers, but it is still in demand for short trips and pleasure cruises. Teekay Offshore Partners L.P. Cum Red Perp Pfd., Kirby Corporation and Seaspan Corporation are some of the well-known names in the business.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BWLP($1.9B) has a higher market cap than ECO($721M). ECO has higher P/E ratio than BWLP: ECO (6.50) vs BWLP (3.49). ECO (15.052) and BWLP (14.613) have similar YTD gains . BWLP has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 773M vs. ECO (215M). BWLP has more cash in the bank: 316M vs. ECO (49.1M). BWLP has less debt than ECO: BWLP (602M) vs ECO (657M). BWLP has higher revenues than ECO: BWLP (3.6B) vs ECO (400M).
BWLPECOBWLP / ECO
Capitalization1.9B721M264%
EBITDA773M215M360%
Gain YTD14.61315.05297%
P/E Ratio3.496.5054%
Revenue3.6B400M901%
Total Cash316M49.1M644%
Total Debt602M657M92%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BWLP: Fundamental Ratings
BWLP
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
61
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
3
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
33
SMR RATING
1..100
29
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
51
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
50
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BWLPECO
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
59%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
66%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
45%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
31%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
49%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
43%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 19 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
68%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
50%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
47%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
58%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
BWLP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
ECO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SPY611.491.79
+0.29%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
AAPL244.47-0.13
-0.05%
Apple
GME26.97-0.03
-0.11%
GameStop Corp
BTC.X95539.550000-233.835940
-0.24%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
TSLA354.11-1.73
-0.49%
Tesla

BWLP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BWLP has been loosely correlated with HAFN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 52% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BWLP jumps, then HAFN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BWLP
1D Price
Change %
BWLP100%
+2.76%
HAFN - BWLP
52%
Loosely correlated
+0.98%
ECO - BWLP
49%
Loosely correlated
+0.49%
CMRE - BWLP
42%
Loosely correlated
-0.38%
ASC - BWLP
41%
Loosely correlated
+0.58%
NAT - BWLP
39%
Loosely correlated
+0.76%
More

ECO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ECO has been closely correlated with NAT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 67% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ECO jumps, then NAT could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ECO
1D Price
Change %
ECO100%
+0.49%
NAT - ECO
67%
Closely correlated
+0.76%
HAFN - ECO
65%
Loosely correlated
+0.98%
ASC - ECO
65%
Loosely correlated
+0.58%
SFL - ECO
53%
Loosely correlated
+2.86%
BWLP - ECO
49%
Loosely correlated
+2.76%
More