BWLP
Price
$12.57
Change
+$0.07 (+0.56%)
Updated
Jul 7, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
1.92B
49 days until earnings call
CSPKY
Price
$5.36
Change
+$0.60 (+12.61%)
Updated
Jun 2 closing price
Capitalization
2.66B
Interact to see
Advertisement

BWLP vs CSPKY

Header iconBWLP vs CSPKY Comparison
Open Charts BWLP vs CSPKYBanner chart's image
BW LPG
Price$12.57
Change+$0.07 (+0.56%)
Volume$8.8K
Capitalization1.92B
COSCO SHIPPING Ports
Price$5.36
Change+$0.60 (+12.61%)
Volume$108
Capitalization2.66B
BWLP vs CSPKY Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BWLP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CSPKY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BWLP vs. CSPKY commentary
Jul 08, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BWLP is a Hold and CSPKY is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 08, 2025
Stock price -- (BWLP: $12.50 vs. CSPKY: $5.36)
Brand notoriety: BWLP and CSPKY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Marine Shipping industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BWLP: 62% vs. CSPKY: 9%
Market capitalization -- BWLP: $1.92B vs. CSPKY: $2.66B
BWLP [@Marine Shipping] is valued at $1.92B. CSPKY’s [@Marine Shipping] market capitalization is $2.66B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Marine Shipping] industry ranges from $32.15B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Marine Shipping] industry is $4.58B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BWLP’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileCSPKY’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BWLP’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • CSPKY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, BWLP is a better buy in the long-term than CSPKY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BWLP’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CSPKY’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BWLP’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • CSPKY’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both BWLP and CSPKY are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

BWLP (@Marine Shipping) experienced а +4.34% price change this week, while CSPKY (@Marine Shipping) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Marine Shipping industry was +3.18%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.40%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2.93%.

Reported Earning Dates

BWLP is expected to report earnings on Aug 26, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Marine Shipping (+3.18% weekly)

The marine shipping industry provides passenger transportation or cargo shipping services via waterways. This industry includes freight towage, ferry services and warehousing on deep-sea and inland waterways. The aviation sector may have reduced the popularity of sea travel for several passengers, but it is still in demand for short trips and pleasure cruises. Teekay Offshore Partners L.P. Cum Red Perp Pfd., Kirby Corporation and Seaspan Corporation are some of the well-known names in the business.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSPKY($2.66B) has a higher market cap than BWLP($1.92B). BWLP has higher P/E ratio than CSPKY: BWLP (6.72) vs CSPKY (6.31). BWLP YTD gains are higher at: 17.438 vs. CSPKY (4.181). CSPKY has more cash in the bank: 312M vs. BWLP (283M). BWLP has less debt than CSPKY: BWLP (1.13B) vs CSPKY (4.02B).
BWLPCSPKYBWLP / CSPKY
Capitalization1.92B2.66B72%
EBITDA583MN/A-
Gain YTD17.4384.181417%
P/E Ratio6.726.31107%
Revenue3.39BN/A-
Total Cash283M312M91%
Total Debt1.13B4.02B28%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BWLP vs CSPKY: Fundamental Ratings
BWLP
CSPKY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
4
Undervalued
24
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3757
SMR RATING
1..100
5481
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4258
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2670
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BWLP's Valuation (4) in the null industry is in the same range as CSPKY (24). This means that BWLP’s stock grew similarly to CSPKY’s over the last 12 months.

BWLP's Profit vs Risk Rating (37) in the null industry is in the same range as CSPKY (57). This means that BWLP’s stock grew similarly to CSPKY’s over the last 12 months.

BWLP's SMR Rating (54) in the null industry is in the same range as CSPKY (81). This means that BWLP’s stock grew similarly to CSPKY’s over the last 12 months.

BWLP's Price Growth Rating (42) in the null industry is in the same range as CSPKY (58). This means that BWLP’s stock grew similarly to CSPKY’s over the last 12 months.

BWLP's P/E Growth Rating (26) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CSPKY (70). This means that BWLP’s stock grew somewhat faster than CSPKY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BWLPCSPKY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
49%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
28%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
44%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
75%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
33%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
37%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
31%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
79%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 18 days ago
66%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
69%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
70%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BWLP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CSPKY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CRTSX12.080.12
+1.00%
Catholic Rsp Invst Mlt-Styl US Eq Ins
BGGIX11.750.10
+0.86%
William Blair Global Leaders R6
NALFX74.000.56
+0.76%
New Alternatives A
DFFVX34.850.18
+0.52%
DFA US Targeted Value I
MGLAX16.630.02
+0.12%
MFS Global Real Estate A

BWLP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BWLP has been loosely correlated with ECO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 60% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BWLP jumps, then ECO could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BWLP
1D Price
Change %
BWLP100%
+1.05%
ECO - BWLP
60%
Loosely correlated
+4.70%
HAFN - BWLP
60%
Loosely correlated
+2.16%
GNK - BWLP
54%
Loosely correlated
N/A
SFL - BWLP
54%
Loosely correlated
+0.34%
SB - BWLP
54%
Loosely correlated
+1.34%
More

CSPKY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CSPKY and CMHHF have been poorly correlated (+10% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CSPKY and CMHHF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CSPKY
1D Price
Change %
CSPKY100%
N/A
CMHHF - CSPKY
10%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CICOY - CSPKY
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BWLP - CSPKY
2%
Poorly correlated
+1.05%
ASCJF - CSPKY
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CSDXF - CSPKY
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More