BWLP
Price
$12.42
Change
+$0.54 (+4.55%)
Updated
Jun 17, 12:50 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
1.79B
70 days until earnings call
CMHHF
Price
$1.95
Change
-$0.11 (-5.34%)
Updated
May 28 closing price
Capitalization
7.86B
Interact to see
Advertisement

BWLP vs CMHHF

Header iconBWLP vs CMHHF Comparison
Open Charts BWLP vs CMHHFBanner chart's image
BW LPG
Price$12.42
Change+$0.54 (+4.55%)
Volume$500
Capitalization1.79B
China Merchants Port Holdings
Price$1.95
Change-$0.11 (-5.34%)
Volume$200
Capitalization7.86B
BWLP vs CMHHF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BWLP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BWLP vs. CMHHF commentary
Jun 17, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BWLP is a Buy and CMHHF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 17, 2025
Stock price -- (BWLP: $11.88 vs. CMHHF: $1.95)
Brand notoriety: BWLP and CMHHF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Marine Shipping industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BWLP: 183% vs. CMHHF: 9%
Market capitalization -- BWLP: $1.79B vs. CMHHF: $7.86B
BWLP [@Marine Shipping] is valued at $1.79B. CMHHF’s [@Marine Shipping] market capitalization is $7.86B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Marine Shipping] industry ranges from $33.4B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Marine Shipping] industry is $4.72B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BWLP’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileCMHHF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BWLP’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • CMHHF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, BWLP is a better buy in the long-term than CMHHF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BWLP’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • BWLP’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.

Price Growth

BWLP (@Marine Shipping) experienced а +6.93% price change this week, while CMHHF (@Marine Shipping) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Marine Shipping industry was +2.08%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.34%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6.66%.

Reported Earning Dates

BWLP is expected to report earnings on Aug 26, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Marine Shipping (+2.08% weekly)

The marine shipping industry provides passenger transportation or cargo shipping services via waterways. This industry includes freight towage, ferry services and warehousing on deep-sea and inland waterways. The aviation sector may have reduced the popularity of sea travel for several passengers, but it is still in demand for short trips and pleasure cruises. Teekay Offshore Partners L.P. Cum Red Perp Pfd., Kirby Corporation and Seaspan Corporation are some of the well-known names in the business.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CMHHF($7.86B) has a higher market cap than BWLP($1.79B). CMHHF has higher P/E ratio than BWLP: CMHHF (8.12) vs BWLP (6.35). CMHHF YTD gains are higher at: 20.743 vs. BWLP (11.613).
BWLPCMHHFBWLP / CMHHF
Capitalization1.79B7.86B23%
EBITDA583MN/A-
Gain YTD11.61320.74356%
P/E Ratio6.358.1278%
Revenue3.39BN/A-
Total Cash283MN/A-
Total Debt1.13BN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BWLP vs CMHHF: Fundamental Ratings
BWLP
CMHHF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
734
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
4
Undervalued
16
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3974
SMR RATING
1..100
5476
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4937
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1942
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BWLP's Valuation (4) in the null industry is in the same range as CMHHF (16). This means that BWLP’s stock grew similarly to CMHHF’s over the last 12 months.

BWLP's Profit vs Risk Rating (39) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CMHHF (74). This means that BWLP’s stock grew somewhat faster than CMHHF’s over the last 12 months.

BWLP's SMR Rating (54) in the null industry is in the same range as CMHHF (76). This means that BWLP’s stock grew similarly to CMHHF’s over the last 12 months.

CMHHF's Price Growth Rating (37) in the null industry is in the same range as BWLP (49). This means that CMHHF’s stock grew similarly to BWLP’s over the last 12 months.

BWLP's P/E Growth Rating (19) in the null industry is in the same range as CMHHF (42). This means that BWLP’s stock grew similarly to CMHHF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BWLP
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
42%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
55%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
70%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
72%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
79%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 27 days ago
68%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
61%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
70%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BWLP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ILMN90.253.32
+3.82%
Illumina
IMNM9.540.34
+3.70%
Immunome
CXM8.210.26
+3.27%
Sprinklr
QIPT1.99-0.01
-0.50%
Quipt Home Medical Corp
XFOR2.73-0.09
-3.19%
X4 Pharmaceuticals Inc

BWLP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BWLP has been loosely correlated with HAFN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BWLP jumps, then HAFN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BWLP
1D Price
Change %
BWLP100%
-0.83%
HAFN - BWLP
61%
Loosely correlated
-2.17%
ECO - BWLP
61%
Loosely correlated
-3.35%
SB - BWLP
54%
Loosely correlated
-1.29%
GNK - BWLP
54%
Loosely correlated
-2.34%
SFL - BWLP
54%
Loosely correlated
+0.70%
More

CMHHF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CMHHF and SITIF have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CMHHF and SITIF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CMHHF
1D Price
Change %
CMHHF100%
N/A
SITIF - CMHHF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HHULY - CMHHF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CSPKY - CMHHF
10%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CICOY - CMHHF
9%
Poorly correlated
-2.56%
BWLP - CMHHF
5%
Poorly correlated
-0.83%
More