BWLP
Price
$12.57
Change
+$0.07 (+0.56%)
Updated
Jul 7, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
1.92B
49 days until earnings call
CICOF
Price
$1.70
Change
-$0.02 (-1.16%)
Updated
Jul 2 closing price
Capitalization
32.15B
Interact to see
Advertisement

BWLP vs CICOF

Header iconBWLP vs CICOF Comparison
Open Charts BWLP vs CICOFBanner chart's image
BW LPG
Price$12.57
Change+$0.07 (+0.56%)
Volume$8.8K
Capitalization1.92B
COSCO SHIPPING Holdings
Price$1.70
Change-$0.02 (-1.16%)
Volume$10.89K
Capitalization32.15B
BWLP vs CICOF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BWLP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CICOF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BWLP vs. CICOF commentary
Jul 08, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BWLP is a Hold and CICOF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 08, 2025
Stock price -- (BWLP: $12.50 vs. CICOF: $1.70)
Brand notoriety: BWLP and CICOF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Marine Shipping industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BWLP: 62% vs. CICOF: 279%
Market capitalization -- BWLP: $1.92B vs. CICOF: $32.15B
BWLP [@Marine Shipping] is valued at $1.92B. CICOF’s [@Marine Shipping] market capitalization is $32.15B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Marine Shipping] industry ranges from $32.15B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Marine Shipping] industry is $4.58B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BWLP’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileCICOF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • BWLP’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • CICOF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, BWLP is a better buy in the long-term than CICOF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BWLP’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CICOF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BWLP’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • CICOF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BWLP is a better buy in the short-term than CICOF.

Price Growth

BWLP (@Marine Shipping) experienced а +4.34% price change this week, while CICOF (@Marine Shipping) price change was +2.41% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Marine Shipping industry was +3.18%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.40%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2.93%.

Reported Earning Dates

BWLP is expected to report earnings on Aug 26, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Marine Shipping (+3.18% weekly)

The marine shipping industry provides passenger transportation or cargo shipping services via waterways. This industry includes freight towage, ferry services and warehousing on deep-sea and inland waterways. The aviation sector may have reduced the popularity of sea travel for several passengers, but it is still in demand for short trips and pleasure cruises. Teekay Offshore Partners L.P. Cum Red Perp Pfd., Kirby Corporation and Seaspan Corporation are some of the well-known names in the business.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CICOF($32.1B) has a higher market cap than BWLP($1.92B). BWLP has higher P/E ratio than CICOF: BWLP (6.72) vs CICOF (3.96). BWLP YTD gains are higher at: 17.438 vs. CICOF (3.659).
BWLPCICOFBWLP / CICOF
Capitalization1.92B32.1B6%
EBITDA583MN/A-
Gain YTD17.4383.659477%
P/E Ratio6.723.96170%
Revenue3.39BN/A-
Total Cash283MN/A-
Total Debt1.13BN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BWLP vs CICOF: Fundamental Ratings
BWLP
CICOF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
4
Undervalued
4
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3736
SMR RATING
1..100
5420
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4258
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2697
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BWLP's Valuation (4) in the null industry is in the same range as CICOF (4). This means that BWLP’s stock grew similarly to CICOF’s over the last 12 months.

CICOF's Profit vs Risk Rating (36) in the null industry is in the same range as BWLP (37). This means that CICOF’s stock grew similarly to BWLP’s over the last 12 months.

CICOF's SMR Rating (20) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BWLP (54). This means that CICOF’s stock grew somewhat faster than BWLP’s over the last 12 months.

BWLP's Price Growth Rating (42) in the null industry is in the same range as CICOF (58). This means that BWLP’s stock grew similarly to CICOF’s over the last 12 months.

BWLP's P/E Growth Rating (26) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for CICOF (97). This means that BWLP’s stock grew significantly faster than CICOF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BWLPCICOF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
49%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
75%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
69%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
62%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
79%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
66%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
79%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 18 days ago
66%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
84%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
60%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BWLP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CICOF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
EOSE5.080.18
+3.67%
Eos Energy Enterprises
MRUS53.820.49
+0.92%
Merus NV
GEHC76.07-0.05
-0.07%
GE HealthCare Technologies
MSEX55.57-0.32
-0.57%
Middlesex Water Company
ONMD0.55-0.08
-12.54%
OneMedNet Corp

BWLP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BWLP has been loosely correlated with ECO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 60% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BWLP jumps, then ECO could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BWLP
1D Price
Change %
BWLP100%
+1.05%
ECO - BWLP
60%
Loosely correlated
+4.70%
HAFN - BWLP
60%
Loosely correlated
+2.16%
GNK - BWLP
54%
Loosely correlated
N/A
SFL - BWLP
54%
Loosely correlated
+0.34%
SB - BWLP
54%
Loosely correlated
+1.34%
More

CICOF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CICOF and AMKAF have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CICOF and AMKAF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CICOF
1D Price
Change %
CICOF100%
N/A
AMKAF - CICOF
22%
Poorly correlated
-0.17%
MPZZF - CICOF
20%
Poorly correlated
+3.23%
AMKBY - CICOF
12%
Poorly correlated
-1.79%
BWLP - CICOF
11%
Poorly correlated
+1.05%
CICOY - CICOF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More