Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BWLCX vs RMFEX
BWLCX vs RMFEX Comparison
Open Charts BWLCX vs RMFEX
American Beacon Man Lg Cp Value C
Price$24.54
Change+$0.06 (+0.25%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets238.81M
American Funds American Mutual R4
Price$60.55
Change-$1.72 (-2.76%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets111.52B
BWLCX vs RMFEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BWLCX vs. RMFEX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BWLCX is a Hold and RMFEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFEX has more cash in the bank: 112B vs. BWLCX (239M). RMFEX pays higher dividends than BWLCX: RMFEX (1.50) vs BWLCX (0.00). BWLCX was incepted earlier than RMFEX: BWLCX (14 years) vs RMFEX (24 years). BWLCX (1.94) is less costly to investors than RMFEX (0.62). BWLCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 64.00 vs. RMFEX (30.00). RMFEX has a lower initial minimum investment than BWLCX: RMFEX (250) vs BWLCX (1000). BWLCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.65 vs. RMFEX (7.80). RMFEX return over 5 years is better than : 46.45 vs. BWLCX (11.32).
| BWLCX | RMFEX | BWLCX / RMFEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.94 | 0.62 | 313% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.94 | 0.62 | 313% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.096 | 2.280 | 223% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 239M | 112B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.50 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.65 | 7.80 | 124% |
| Returns for 3 years | 3.27 | 29.96 | 11% |
| Returns for 5 years | 11.32 | 46.45 | 24% |
| Returns for 10 years | 30.40 | 114.19 | 27% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement