Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BWLAX vs RMFCX
BWLAX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts BWLAX vs RMFCX
American Beacon Man Lg Cp Value A
Price$25.67
Change+$0.15 (+0.59%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets225.08M
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$61.51
Change+$0.17 (+0.28%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets111.18B
BWLAX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BWLAX vs. RMFCX commentary
Oct 21, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BWLAX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 111B vs. BWLAX (225M). RMFCX pays higher dividends than BWLAX: RMFCX (1.20) vs BWLAX (0.83). BWLAX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: BWLAX (14 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). BWLAX (1.21) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). BWLAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 64.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than BWLAX: RMFCX (250) vs BWLAX (2500). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.96 vs. BWLAX (-4.70). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 57.10 vs. BWLAX (23.17).
| BWLAX | RMFCX | BWLAX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.21 | 0.91 | 133% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.21 | 0.91 | 133% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.598 | 13.689 | 107% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 225M | 111B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.83 | 1.20 | 69% |
| Returns for 1 year | -4.70 | 4.96 | -95% |
| Returns for 3 years | 16.80 | 38.79 | 43% |
| Returns for 5 years | 23.17 | 57.10 | 41% |
| Returns for 10 years | 23.81 | 91.18 | 26% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers