Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BWLAX vs RMFCX
BWLAX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts BWLAX vs RMFCX
American Beacon Man Lg Cp Value A
Price$25.01
Change-$0.01 (-0.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets235.09M
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$59.36
Change+$0.01 (+0.02%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets111.8B
BWLAX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BWLAX vs. RMFCX commentary
Dec 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BWLAX is a Hold and RMFCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 112B vs. BWLAX (235M). RMFCX pays higher dividends than BWLAX: RMFCX (1.18) vs BWLAX (0.80). BWLAX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: BWLAX (14 years) vs RMFCX (24 years). BWLAX (1.21) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). BWLAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 64.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than BWLAX: RMFCX (250) vs BWLAX (2500). BWLAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.03 vs. RMFCX (7.94). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 46.19 vs. BWLAX (19.54).
| BWLAX | RMFCX | BWLAX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.21 | 0.91 | 133% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.21 | 0.91 | 133% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.652 | 9.715 | 120% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 235M | 112B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.80 | 1.18 | 67% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.03 | 7.94 | 126% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.23 | 28.72 | 39% |
| Returns for 5 years | 19.54 | 46.19 | 42% |
| Returns for 10 years | 22.84 | 90.34 | 25% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers