Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BWLAX vs RMFCX
BWLAX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts BWLAX vs RMFCX
American Beacon Man Lg Cp Value A
Price$25.24
Change-$0.06 (-0.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets228.68M
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$60.38
Change-$0.07 (-0.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets109.46B
BWLAX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BWLAX vs. RMFCX commentary
Sep 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BWLAX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 109B vs. BWLAX (229M). RMFCX pays higher dividends than BWLAX: RMFCX (1.24) vs BWLAX (0.85). BWLAX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: BWLAX (14 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). BWLAX (1.21) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). BWLAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 64.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than BWLAX: RMFCX (250) vs BWLAX (2500). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.71 vs. BWLAX (0.63). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 56.72 vs. BWLAX (23.46).
| BWLAX | RMFCX | BWLAX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.21 | 0.91 | 133% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.21 | 0.91 | 133% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.679 | 11.292 | 112% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 229M | 109B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.85 | 1.24 | 69% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.63 | 8.71 | 7% |
| Returns for 3 years | 9.21 | 28.01 | 33% |
| Returns for 5 years | 23.46 | 56.72 | 41% |
| Returns for 10 years | 25.27 | 92.34 | 27% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers