BWFG
Price
$46.96
Change
-$0.79 (-1.65%)
Updated
Dec 26, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
376.15M
33 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
UCB
Price
$32.27
Change
-$0.25 (-0.77%)
Updated
Dec 26, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
3.95B
19 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

BWFG vs UCB

Header iconBWFG vs UCB Comparison
Open Charts BWFG vs UCBBanner chart's image
Bankwell Financial Group
Price$46.96
Change-$0.79 (-1.65%)
Volume$709
Capitalization376.15M
United Community Banks
Price$32.27
Change-$0.25 (-0.77%)
Volume$7.73K
Capitalization3.95B
BWFG vs UCB Comparison Chart in %
BWFG
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
UCB
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BWFG vs. UCB commentary
Dec 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BWFG is a Buy and UCB is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 27, 2025
Stock price -- (BWFG: $47.75 vs. UCB: $32.52)
Brand notoriety: BWFG and UCB are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BWFG: 43% vs. UCB: 48%
Market capitalization -- BWFG: $376.15M vs. UCB: $3.95B
BWFG [@Regional Banks] is valued at $376.15M. UCB’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $3.95B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $171.46B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $8.65B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BWFG’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileUCB’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BWFG’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • UCB’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, BWFG is a better buy in the long-term than UCB.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BWFG’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while UCB’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BWFG’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • UCB’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, UCB is a better buy in the short-term than BWFG.

Price Growth

BWFG (@Regional Banks) experienced а -4.31% price change this week, while UCB (@Regional Banks) price change was +0.18% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -0.38%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.90%, and the average quarterly price growth was +15.50%.

Reported Earning Dates

BWFG is expected to report earnings on Jan 28, 2026.

UCB is expected to report earnings on Jan 14, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-0.38% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
UCB($3.95B) has a higher market cap than BWFG($376M). BWFG (13.05) and UCB (12.90) have similar P/E ratio . BWFG YTD gains are higher at: 56.663 vs. UCB (3.163). BWFG has less debt than UCB: BWFG (145M) vs UCB (155M). UCB has higher revenues than BWFG: UCB (1.01B) vs BWFG (99.2M).
BWFGUCBBWFG / UCB
Capitalization376M3.95B10%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD56.6633.1631,791%
P/E Ratio13.0512.90101%
Revenue99.2M1.01B10%
Total CashN/A202M-
Total Debt145M155M94%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BWFG vs UCB: Fundamental Ratings
BWFG
UCB
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
4712
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
57
Fair valued
75
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1568
SMR RATING
1..100
4513
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4350
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
7689
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BWFG's Valuation (57) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as UCB (75). This means that BWFG’s stock grew similarly to UCB’s over the last 12 months.

BWFG's Profit vs Risk Rating (15) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for UCB (68). This means that BWFG’s stock grew somewhat faster than UCB’s over the last 12 months.

UCB's SMR Rating (13) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as BWFG (45). This means that UCB’s stock grew similarly to BWFG’s over the last 12 months.

BWFG's Price Growth Rating (43) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as UCB (50). This means that BWFG’s stock grew similarly to UCB’s over the last 12 months.

BWFG's P/E Growth Rating (76) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as UCB (89). This means that BWFG’s stock grew similarly to UCB’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BWFGUCB
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
53%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
49%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
53%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
56%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
52%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 16 days ago
55%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
70%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
45%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
53%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
42%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BWFG
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
UCB
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
LBWCX20.840.10
+0.48%
BrandywineGLOBAL Div US Large Value C
TRHZX179.840.58
+0.32%
T. Rowe Price Equity Index 500 Z
FBMCX12.940.04
+0.31%
Franklin Managed Income C
BOPAX23.20N/A
N/A
Sterling Capital Special Opps A
FICDX78.84-0.07
-0.09%
Fidelity Canada

BWFG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BWFG has been closely correlated with TMP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BWFG jumps, then TMP could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BWFG
1D Price
Change %
BWFG100%
-0.77%
TMP - BWFG
77%
Closely correlated
+0.27%
TCBK - BWFG
73%
Closely correlated
-0.70%
FMBH - BWFG
73%
Closely correlated
-0.72%
ONB - BWFG
72%
Closely correlated
+0.09%
UCB - BWFG
72%
Closely correlated
+0.25%
More

UCB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, UCB has been closely correlated with UBSI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 91% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if UCB jumps, then UBSI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To UCB
1D Price
Change %
UCB100%
+0.25%
UBSI - UCB
91%
Closely correlated
+0.08%
WSFS - UCB
91%
Closely correlated
+0.11%
FNB - UCB
91%
Closely correlated
+0.17%
HWC - UCB
91%
Closely correlated
-0.46%
TRMK - UCB
90%
Closely correlated
-0.15%
More