BWFG
Price
$45.50
Change
+$0.40 (+0.89%)
Updated
Nov 13 closing price
Capitalization
358.42M
75 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
UCB
Price
$29.98
Change
-$0.15 (-0.50%)
Updated
Nov 13 closing price
Capitalization
3.64B
67 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

BWFG vs UCB

Header iconBWFG vs UCB Comparison
Open Charts BWFG vs UCBBanner chart's image
Bankwell Financial Group
Price$45.50
Change+$0.40 (+0.89%)
Volume$15.73K
Capitalization358.42M
United Community Banks
Price$29.98
Change-$0.15 (-0.50%)
Volume$612.27K
Capitalization3.64B
BWFG vs UCB Comparison Chart in %
BWFG
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
UCB
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BWFG vs. UCB commentary
Nov 14, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BWFG is a StrongBuy and UCB is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 14, 2025
Stock price -- (BWFG: $45.50 vs. UCB: $29.98)
Brand notoriety: BWFG and UCB are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BWFG: 50% vs. UCB: 94%
Market capitalization -- BWFG: $358.42M vs. UCB: $3.64B
BWFG [@Regional Banks] is valued at $358.42M. UCB’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $3.64B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $171.25B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $8.19B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BWFG’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileUCB’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BWFG’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • UCB’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, BWFG is a better buy in the long-term than UCB.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BWFG’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while UCB’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BWFG’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • UCB’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BWFG is a better buy in the short-term than UCB.

Price Growth

BWFG (@Regional Banks) experienced а +5.51% price change this week, while UCB (@Regional Banks) price change was +1.66% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +1.09%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.61%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.37%.

Reported Earning Dates

BWFG is expected to report earnings on Jan 28, 2026.

UCB is expected to report earnings on Jan 20, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+1.09% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
UCB($3.64B) has a higher market cap than BWFG($358M). BWFG (12.43) and UCB (11.90) have similar P/E ratio . BWFG YTD gains are higher at: 49.281 vs. UCB (-4.895). BWFG has less debt than UCB: BWFG (145M) vs UCB (155M). UCB has higher revenues than BWFG: UCB (953M) vs BWFG (99.2M).
BWFGUCBBWFG / UCB
Capitalization358M3.64B10%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD49.281-4.895-1,007%
P/E Ratio12.4311.90104%
Revenue99.2M953M10%
Total CashN/A202M-
Total Debt145M155M94%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BWFG vs UCB: Fundamental Ratings
BWFG
UCB
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
159
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
57
Fair valued
76
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1557
SMR RATING
1..100
4313
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4359
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
7590
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
950

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BWFG's Valuation (57) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as UCB (76). This means that BWFG’s stock grew similarly to UCB’s over the last 12 months.

BWFG's Profit vs Risk Rating (15) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for UCB (57). This means that BWFG’s stock grew somewhat faster than UCB’s over the last 12 months.

UCB's SMR Rating (13) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as BWFG (43). This means that UCB’s stock grew similarly to BWFG’s over the last 12 months.

BWFG's Price Growth Rating (43) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as UCB (59). This means that BWFG’s stock grew similarly to UCB’s over the last 12 months.

BWFG's P/E Growth Rating (75) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as UCB (90). This means that BWFG’s stock grew similarly to UCB’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BWFGUCB
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
75%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
53%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
60%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
60%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
57%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
57%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 23 days ago
70%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
48%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
51%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BWFG
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
UCB
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FDTGX82.79N/A
N/A
Fidelity Advisor Consumer Staples M
FAGCX241.19N/A
N/A
Fidelity Advisor Growth Opps I
FMSDX15.81N/A
N/A
Fidelity Multi-Asset Income
SMDLX23.17-0.32
-1.36%
ClearBridge Tactical Dividend Income C
WCMVX20.16-0.32
-1.56%
WCM Focused International Equity Ins

BWFG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BWFG has been closely correlated with TRMK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BWFG jumps, then TRMK could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BWFG
1D Price
Change %
BWFG100%
+0.88%
TRMK - BWFG
76%
Closely correlated
-1.27%
TMP - BWFG
75%
Closely correlated
-0.49%
TCBK - BWFG
75%
Closely correlated
-1.49%
WASH - BWFG
74%
Closely correlated
-0.82%
ONB - BWFG
74%
Closely correlated
-0.95%
More