BWFG
Price
$43.76
Change
+$0.68 (+1.58%)
Updated
Sep 8, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
339.36M
44 days until earnings call
GBFH
Price
$40.38
Change
+$1.04 (+2.64%)
Updated
Sep 8, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
575.62M
39 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

BWFG vs GBFH

Header iconBWFG vs GBFH Comparison
Open Charts BWFG vs GBFHBanner chart's image
Bankwell Financial Group
Price$43.76
Change+$0.68 (+1.58%)
Volume$213
Capitalization339.36M
Gbank Financial Holdings
Price$40.38
Change+$1.04 (+2.64%)
Volume$514
Capitalization575.62M
BWFG vs GBFH Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BWFG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GBFH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BWFG vs. GBFH commentary
Sep 09, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BWFG is a StrongBuy and GBFH is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 09, 2025
Stock price -- (BWFG: $43.08 vs. GBFH: $39.34)
Brand notoriety: BWFG and GBFH are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BWFG: 102% vs. GBFH: 143%
Market capitalization -- BWFG: $344.72M vs. GBFH: $575.62M
BWFG [@Regional Banks] is valued at $344.72M. GBFH’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $575.62M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $168.19B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.76B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BWFG’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileGBFH’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BWFG’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • GBFH’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, BWFG is a better buy in the long-term than GBFH.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BWFG’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GBFH’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BWFG’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • GBFH’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both BWFG and GBFH are a bad buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

BWFG (@Regional Banks) experienced а +1.89% price change this week, while GBFH (@Regional Banks) price change was -0.97% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.34%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.60%, and the average quarterly price growth was +14.52%.

Reported Earning Dates

BWFG is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2025.

GBFH is expected to report earnings on Oct 17, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.34% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GBFH($576M) has a higher market cap than BWFG($339M). GBFH has higher P/E ratio than BWFG: GBFH (31.74) vs BWFG (16.32). BWFG YTD gains are higher at: 40.696 vs. GBFH (-8.512). GBFH has less debt than BWFG: GBFH (32.2M) vs BWFG (145M).
BWFGGBFHBWFG / GBFH
Capitalization339M576M59%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD40.696-8.512-478%
P/E Ratio16.3231.7451%
RevenueN/AN/A-
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt145M32.2M450%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BWFG: Fundamental Ratings
BWFG
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
67
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
17
SMR RATING
1..100
51
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
40
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
12
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BWFGGBFH
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
71%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
51%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
67%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
44%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
55%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
61%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
57%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
73%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
53%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
55%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
55%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
50%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BWFG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GBFH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
LNTEF16.00N/A
N/A
Lintec Corp.
SKSUF17.53N/A
N/A
Sekisui Chemical Co.
CFOO0.66N/A
N/A
China Foods Holdings Ltd.
ONVVF0.16N/A
N/A
Oneview Healthcare PLC
PSTVY13.79-0.76
-5.22%
Postal Svgs Bk of China Ltd.

BWFG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BWFG has been closely correlated with UBSI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BWFG jumps, then UBSI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BWFG
1D Price
Change %
BWFG100%
+0.98%
UBSI - BWFG
76%
Closely correlated
-0.98%
TCBK - BWFG
75%
Closely correlated
-1.14%
PFIS - BWFG
75%
Closely correlated
-1.18%
FBNC - BWFG
75%
Closely correlated
-0.27%
ONB - BWFG
75%
Closely correlated
-0.91%
More

GBFH and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GBFH has been loosely correlated with HOMB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GBFH jumps, then HOMB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GBFH
1D Price
Change %
GBFH100%
+2.41%
HOMB - GBFH
36%
Loosely correlated
-0.76%
BWFG - GBFH
35%
Loosely correlated
+0.98%
BCAL - GBFH
35%
Loosely correlated
+0.06%
FULT - GBFH
35%
Loosely correlated
-1.72%
EWBC - GBFH
34%
Loosely correlated
-0.93%
More