BWFG
Price
$47.25
Change
+$1.02 (+2.21%)
Updated
Dec 3 closing price
Capitalization
372.21M
55 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
FMBH
Price
$40.37
Change
+$1.62 (+4.18%)
Updated
Dec 3, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
925.34M
50 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

BWFG vs FMBH

Header iconBWFG vs FMBH Comparison
Open Charts BWFG vs FMBHBanner chart's image
Bankwell Financial Group
Price$47.25
Change+$1.02 (+2.21%)
Volume$56.47K
Capitalization372.21M
First Mid Bancshares
Price$40.37
Change+$1.62 (+4.18%)
Volume$1.47K
Capitalization925.34M
BWFG vs FMBH Comparison Chart in %
BWFG
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
FMBH
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BWFG vs. FMBH commentary
Dec 04, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BWFG is a StrongBuy and FMBH is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 04, 2025
Stock price -- (BWFG: $46.54 vs. FMBH: $38.78)
Brand notoriety: BWFG and FMBH are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BWFG: 59% vs. FMBH: 23%
Market capitalization -- BWFG: $364.33M vs. FMBH: $925.34M
BWFG [@Regional Banks] is valued at $364.33M. FMBH’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $925.34M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $172.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $8.26B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BWFG’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileFMBH’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BWFG’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • FMBH’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, BWFG is a better buy in the long-term than FMBH.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BWFG’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FMBH’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BWFG’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • FMBH’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BWFG is a better buy in the short-term than FMBH.

Price Growth

BWFG (@Regional Banks) experienced а +1.84% price change this week, while FMBH (@Regional Banks) price change was +0.88% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.92%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.06%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.89%.

Reported Earning Dates

BWFG is expected to report earnings on Jan 28, 2026.

FMBH is expected to report earnings on Jan 22, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.92% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FMBH($925M) has a higher market cap than BWFG($372M). BWFG has higher P/E ratio than FMBH: BWFG (12.91) vs FMBH (10.59). BWFG YTD gains are higher at: 52.694 vs. FMBH (7.367). BWFG has less debt than FMBH: BWFG (145M) vs FMBH (363M). FMBH has higher revenues than BWFG: FMBH (331M) vs BWFG (99.2M).
BWFGFMBHBWFG / FMBH
Capitalization372M925M40%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD52.6947.367715%
P/E Ratio12.9110.59122%
Revenue99.2M331M30%
Total CashN/A16.1M-
Total Debt145M363M40%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BWFG vs FMBH: Fundamental Ratings
BWFG
FMBH
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
57
Fair valued
98
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1658
SMR RATING
1..100
4325
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4355
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
7566
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BWFG's Valuation (57) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FMBH (98). This means that BWFG’s stock grew somewhat faster than FMBH’s over the last 12 months.

BWFG's Profit vs Risk Rating (16) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FMBH (58). This means that BWFG’s stock grew somewhat faster than FMBH’s over the last 12 months.

FMBH's SMR Rating (25) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as BWFG (43). This means that FMBH’s stock grew similarly to BWFG’s over the last 12 months.

BWFG's Price Growth Rating (43) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FMBH (55). This means that BWFG’s stock grew similarly to FMBH’s over the last 12 months.

FMBH's P/E Growth Rating (66) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as BWFG (75). This means that FMBH’s stock grew similarly to BWFG’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BWFGFMBH
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
49%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
73%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
62%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
74%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
56%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
51%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
56%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 17 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
65%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
64%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
50%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BWFG
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
FMBH
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MNHFF72.00N/A
N/A
Mayr-Melnhof Karton AG
ONVC2.45N/A
N/A
Online Vacation Center Holdings Corp.
RHHVF389.27N/A
N/A
Roche Holding Ltd
SEOAY11.77N/A
N/A
Stora Enso Oyj
UBAB52.66N/A
N/A
United Bancorporation of Alabama, Inc.

BWFG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BWFG has been closely correlated with TMP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BWFG jumps, then TMP could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BWFG
1D Price
Change %
BWFG100%
+0.65%
TMP - BWFG
76%
Closely correlated
+0.50%
TCBK - BWFG
75%
Closely correlated
+0.56%
ONB - BWFG
75%
Closely correlated
-1.46%
FMBH - BWFG
74%
Closely correlated
+0.34%
UCB - BWFG
74%
Closely correlated
-0.81%
More

FMBH and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FMBH has been closely correlated with TCBK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 90% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FMBH jumps, then TCBK could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FMBH
1D Price
Change %
FMBH100%
+0.34%
TCBK - FMBH
90%
Closely correlated
+0.56%
BUSE - FMBH
88%
Closely correlated
-0.09%
CTBI - FMBH
87%
Closely correlated
-0.31%
UBSI - FMBH
87%
Closely correlated
-0.34%
TRMK - FMBH
87%
Closely correlated
-0.67%
More