BWB
Price
$16.12
Change
+$0.01 (+0.06%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
322.83M
88 days until earnings call
IFS
Price
$36.35
Change
-$0.50 (-1.36%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
2.77B
15 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

BWB vs IFS

Header iconBWB vs IFS Comparison
Open Charts BWB vs IFSBanner chart's image
Bridgewater Bancshares
Price$16.12
Change+$0.01 (+0.06%)
Volume$42K
Capitalization322.83M
Intercorp Financial Services
Price$36.35
Change-$0.50 (-1.36%)
Volume$181.9K
Capitalization2.77B
BWB vs IFS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BWB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
IFS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BWB vs. IFS commentary
Jul 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BWB is a Hold and IFS is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 27, 2025
Stock price -- (BWB: $16.12 vs. IFS: $36.35)
Brand notoriety: BWB and IFS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BWB: 58% vs. IFS: 81%
Market capitalization -- BWB: $322.83M vs. IFS: $2.77B
BWB [@Regional Banks] is valued at $322.83M. IFS’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $2.77B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.04B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BWB’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileIFS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BWB’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • IFS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, IFS is a better buy in the long-term than BWB.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BWB’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while IFS’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BWB’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • IFS’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BWB is a better buy in the short-term than IFS.

Price Growth

BWB (@Regional Banks) experienced а -0.49% price change this week, while IFS (@Regional Banks) price change was -3.45% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.51%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.61%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.19%.

Reported Earning Dates

BWB is expected to report earnings on Oct 23, 2025.

IFS is expected to report earnings on Aug 11, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.51% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IFS($2.77B) has a higher market cap than BWB($323M). IFS has higher P/E ratio than BWB: IFS (9.76) vs BWB (9.17). IFS YTD gains are higher at: 27.862 vs. BWB (19.319). BWB has less debt than IFS: BWB (413M) vs IFS (10.4B). IFS has higher revenues than BWB: IFS (6.82B) vs BWB (110M).
BWBIFSBWB / IFS
Capitalization323M2.77B12%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD19.31927.86269%
P/E Ratio9.179.7694%
Revenue110M6.82B2%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt413M10.4B4%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BWB vs IFS: Fundamental Ratings
BWB
IFS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6660
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
65
Fair valued
74
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
5937
SMR RATING
1..100
337
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4944
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5643
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
8n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BWB's Valuation (65) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as IFS (74) in the null industry. This means that BWB’s stock grew similarly to IFS’s over the last 12 months.

IFS's Profit vs Risk Rating (37) in the null industry is in the same range as BWB (59) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that IFS’s stock grew similarly to BWB’s over the last 12 months.

IFS's SMR Rating (7) in the null industry is in the same range as BWB (33) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that IFS’s stock grew similarly to BWB’s over the last 12 months.

IFS's Price Growth Rating (44) in the null industry is in the same range as BWB (49) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that IFS’s stock grew similarly to BWB’s over the last 12 months.

IFS's P/E Growth Rating (43) in the null industry is in the same range as BWB (56) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that IFS’s stock grew similarly to BWB’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BWBIFS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
50%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
51%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
61%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
72%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
66%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BWB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
IFS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MENEF0.120.01
+9.52%
Mene Inc.
WEBNF21.301.55
+7.85%
Westpac Banking Corp. Ltd.
ELEEF26.20N/A
N/A
Element Fleet Mgmt Corp.
POGHF30.00N/A
N/A
Pilot Corp
SHVLF0.24-0.02
-7.80%
Starcore International Mines, Ltd.

BWB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BWB has been closely correlated with THFF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BWB jumps, then THFF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BWB
1D Price
Change %
BWB100%
+0.06%
THFF - BWB
80%
Closely correlated
-0.60%
CNOB - BWB
79%
Closely correlated
-0.41%
BUSE - BWB
79%
Closely correlated
-0.47%
TOWN - BWB
77%
Closely correlated
-1.52%
HBNC - BWB
77%
Closely correlated
+1.10%
More

IFS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IFS has been loosely correlated with BAP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 60% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if IFS jumps, then BAP could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IFS
1D Price
Change %
IFS100%
-1.36%
BAP - IFS
60%
Loosely correlated
-0.54%
BSAC - IFS
58%
Loosely correlated
-1.14%
BCH - IFS
46%
Loosely correlated
-1.64%
BWB - IFS
42%
Loosely correlated
+0.06%
WNEB - IFS
40%
Loosely correlated
-0.44%
More