BWB
Price
$13.22
Change
+$0.18 (+1.38%)
Updated
Apr 17 closing price
Capitalization
322.83M
3 days until earnings call
FVCB
Price
$9.97
Change
+$0.22 (+2.26%)
Updated
Apr 17 closing price
Capitalization
217.74M
One day until earnings call
Ad is loading...

BWB vs FVCB

Header iconBWB vs FVCB Comparison
Open Charts BWB vs FVCBBanner chart's image
Bridgewater Bancshares
Price$13.22
Change+$0.18 (+1.38%)
Volume$41.87K
Capitalization322.83M
FVCBank
Price$9.97
Change+$0.22 (+2.26%)
Volume$46.51K
Capitalization217.74M
BWB vs FVCB Comparison Chart
Loading...
BWB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FVCB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BWB vs. FVCB commentary
Apr 21, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BWB is a Hold and FVCB is a Buy.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 21, 2025
Stock price -- (BWB: $13.22 vs. FVCB: $9.97)
Brand notoriety: BWB and FVCB are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BWB: 78% vs. FVCB: 190%
Market capitalization -- BWB: $322.83M vs. FVCB: $217.74M
BWB [@Regional Banks] is valued at $322.83M. FVCB’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $217.74M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $5.96B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BWB’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileFVCB’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • BWB’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • FVCB’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, BWB is a better buy in the long-term than FVCB.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BWB’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FVCB’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BWB’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • FVCB’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FVCB is a better buy in the short-term than BWB.

Price Growth

BWB (@Regional Banks) experienced а +4.92% price change this week, while FVCB (@Regional Banks) price change was +0.10% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +3.11%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.66%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1.78%.

Reported Earning Dates

BWB is expected to report earnings on Jul 24, 2025.

FVCB is expected to report earnings on Jul 24, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+3.11% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BWB($323M) has a higher market cap than FVCB($218M). FVCB has higher P/E ratio than BWB: FVCB (57.21) vs BWB (9.17). BWB YTD gains are higher at: -2.147 vs. FVCB (-20.684). FVCB has less debt than BWB: FVCB (114M) vs BWB (413M). BWB has higher revenues than FVCB: BWB (110M) vs FVCB (42.1M).
BWBFVCBBWB / FVCB
Capitalization323M218M148%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-2.147-20.68410%
P/E Ratio9.1757.2116%
Revenue110M42.1M261%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt413M114M362%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BWB vs FVCB: Fundamental Ratings
BWB
FVCB
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
70
Overvalued
56
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
6388
SMR RATING
1..100
3460
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5575
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1498
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FVCB's Valuation (56) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as BWB (70). This means that FVCB’s stock grew similarly to BWB’s over the last 12 months.

BWB's Profit vs Risk Rating (63) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FVCB (88). This means that BWB’s stock grew similarly to FVCB’s over the last 12 months.

BWB's SMR Rating (34) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FVCB (60). This means that BWB’s stock grew similarly to FVCB’s over the last 12 months.

BWB's Price Growth Rating (55) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FVCB (75). This means that BWB’s stock grew similarly to FVCB’s over the last 12 months.

BWB's P/E Growth Rating (14) in the Regional Banks industry is significantly better than the same rating for FVCB (98). This means that BWB’s stock grew significantly faster than FVCB’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BWBFVCB
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
48%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
63%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
62%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
63%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
63%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
64%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
69%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
59%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
74%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
56%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
BWB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FVCB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GME26.780.53
+2.02%
GameStop Corp
AAPL196.982.71
+1.39%
Apple
BTC.X85063.414000612.609400
+0.73%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
SPY525.66N/A
N/A
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF
TSLA241.37-0.18
-0.07%
Tesla

BWB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BWB has been closely correlated with THFF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BWB jumps, then THFF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BWB
1D Price
Change %
BWB100%
+1.38%
THFF - BWB
74%
Closely correlated
+0.93%
BUSE - BWB
73%
Closely correlated
-0.20%
SFNC - BWB
73%
Closely correlated
-3.98%
CCNE - BWB
73%
Closely correlated
+0.61%
EQBK - BWB
73%
Closely correlated
+0.11%
More

FVCB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FVCB has been loosely correlated with VBTX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FVCB jumps, then VBTX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FVCB
1D Price
Change %
FVCB100%
+2.26%
VBTX - FVCB
62%
Loosely correlated
+1.40%
AROW - FVCB
61%
Loosely correlated
-2.42%
FRST - FVCB
61%
Loosely correlated
-0.49%
CCBG - FVCB
60%
Loosely correlated
+1.18%
BWB - FVCB
60%
Loosely correlated
+1.38%
More