BWAGF
Price
$126.28
Change
+$1.93 (+1.55%)
Updated
Jun 30 closing price
Capitalization
4.01B
TVLF
Price
$7.25
Change
+$0.10 (+1.40%)
Updated
Jul 1 closing price
Capitalization
N/A
Interact to see
Advertisement

BWAGF vs TVLF

Header iconBWAGF vs TVLF Comparison
Open Charts BWAGF vs TVLFBanner chart's image
BAWAG Group AG
Price$126.28
Change+$1.93 (+1.55%)
Volume$225
Capitalization4.01B
Tennessee Valley Financial Holdings
Price$7.25
Change+$0.10 (+1.40%)
Volume$568
CapitalizationN/A
BWAGF vs TVLF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BWAGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TVLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BWAGF vs. TVLF commentary
Jul 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BWAGF is a Buy and TVLF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 07, 2025
Stock price -- (BWAGF: $126.28 vs. TVLF: $7.25)
Brand notoriety: BWAGF and TVLF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BWAGF: 91% vs. TVLF: 55%
Market capitalization -- BWAGF: $4.01B vs. TVLF: $0
BWAGF [@Regional Banks] is valued at $4.01B. TVLF’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.03B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BWAGF’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileTVLF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BWAGF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • TVLF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, BWAGF is a better buy in the long-term than TVLF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BWAGF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TVLF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BWAGF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • TVLF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 1 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, TVLF is a better buy in the short-term than BWAGF.

Price Growth

BWAGF (@Regional Banks) experienced а +1.55% price change this week, while TVLF (@Regional Banks) price change was +1.40% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +2.86%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.84%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.71%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+2.86% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BWAGF YTD gains are higher at: 48.038 vs. TVLF (-1.226).
BWAGFTVLFBWAGF / TVLF
Capitalization4.01BN/A-
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD48.038-1.226-3,918%
P/E Ratio9.37N/A-
Revenue1.38BN/A-
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt10.4BN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BWAGF vs TVLF: Fundamental Ratings
BWAGF
TVLF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
88
Overvalued
19
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
5100
SMR RATING
1..100
10100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3956
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1634
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a39

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TVLF's Valuation (19) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for BWAGF (88). This means that TVLF’s stock grew significantly faster than BWAGF’s over the last 12 months.

BWAGF's Profit vs Risk Rating (5) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for TVLF (100). This means that BWAGF’s stock grew significantly faster than TVLF’s over the last 12 months.

BWAGF's SMR Rating (10) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for TVLF (100). This means that BWAGF’s stock grew significantly faster than TVLF’s over the last 12 months.

BWAGF's Price Growth Rating (39) in the null industry is in the same range as TVLF (56). This means that BWAGF’s stock grew similarly to TVLF’s over the last 12 months.

BWAGF's P/E Growth Rating (16) in the null industry is in the same range as TVLF (34). This means that BWAGF’s stock grew similarly to TVLF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BWAGFTVLF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
22%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
21%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
46%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
41%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
46%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
17%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
45%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
32%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
44%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
33%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
39%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
53%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
57%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BWAGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TVLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FDLO63.590.62
+0.98%
Fidelity Low Volatility Factor ETF
GLRY33.350.23
+0.70%
Inspire Momentum ETF
OIA5.790.01
+0.17%
INVESCO Municipal Income OPPORTUNITIES TRUST
CCZ62.95N/A
N/A
Comcast Holdings Corp
BTRN39.07-0.05
-0.14%
Global X Bitcoin Trend Strategy ETF

BWAGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BWAGF has been loosely correlated with CMBNF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 35% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BWAGF jumps, then CMBNF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BWAGF
1D Price
Change %
BWAGF100%
N/A
CMBNF - BWAGF
35%
Loosely correlated
N/A
TVLF - BWAGF
32%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BLMIF - BWAGF
25%
Poorly correlated
-5.66%
CRZBF - BWAGF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MTFC - BWAGF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

TVLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that TVLF and BWAGF have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that TVLF and BWAGF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TVLF
1D Price
Change %
TVLF100%
N/A
BWAGF - TVLF
31%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TYCB - TVLF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SWZNF - TVLF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CIBH - TVLF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CTUY - TVLF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More