BWAGF
Price
$93.65
Change
-$0.93 (-0.98%)
Updated
Feb 13 closing price
Capitalization
4.01B
MTFC
Price
$67.00
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jan 14 closing price
Capitalization
N/A
Ad is loading...

BWAGF vs MTFC

Header iconBWAGF vs MTFC Comparison
Open Charts BWAGF vs MTFCBanner chart's image
BAWAG Group AG
Price$93.65
Change-$0.93 (-0.98%)
Volume$137
Capitalization4.01B
Minster Financial
Price$67.00
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$200
CapitalizationN/A
BWAGF vs MTFC Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BWAGF vs. MTFC commentary
Feb 24, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BWAGF is a Hold and MTFC is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 24, 2025
Stock price -- (BWAGF: $93.65 vs. MTFC: $65.85)
Brand notoriety: BWAGF and MTFC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BWAGF: 54% vs. MTFC: 76%
Market capitalization -- BWAGF: $4.01B vs. MTFC: $0
BWAGF [@Regional Banks] is valued at $4.01B. MTFC’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $5.88B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BWAGF’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileMTFC’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BWAGF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • MTFC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, BWAGF is a better buy in the long-term than MTFC.

Price Growth

BWAGF (@Regional Banks) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while MTFC (@Regional Banks) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -0.87%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.98%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.06%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-0.87% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BWAGF YTD gains are higher at: 9.789 vs. MTFC (0.000).
BWAGFMTFCBWAGF / MTFC
Capitalization4.01BN/A-
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD9.7890.000-
P/E Ratio9.37N/A-
Revenue1.38BN/A-
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt10.4BN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BWAGF: Fundamental Ratings
BWAGF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
94
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
88
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
14
SMR RATING
1..100
11
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
38
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
15
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AAPL245.55-0.28
-0.11%
Apple
BTC.X96273.920000-303.835940
-0.31%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
SPY599.94-10.44
-1.71%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
GME26.42-0.62
-2.29%
GameStop Corp
TSLA337.80-16.60
-4.68%
Tesla

BWAGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BWAGF has been loosely correlated with CSKL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BWAGF jumps, then CSKL could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BWAGF
1D Price
Change %
BWAGF100%
N/A
CSKL - BWAGF
36%
Loosely correlated
N/A
CMBNF - BWAGF
35%
Loosely correlated
N/A
TVLF - BWAGF
32%
Poorly correlated
-0.14%
BLMIF - BWAGF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CRZBF - BWAGF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

MTFC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MTFC and PFBN have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MTFC and PFBN's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MTFC
1D Price
Change %
MTFC100%
N/A
PFBN - MTFC
32%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DENI - MTFC
28%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TCNB - MTFC
26%
Poorly correlated
+0.84%
BWAGF - MTFC
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PBKX - MTFC
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More