BWAGF
Price
$85.52
Change
-$3.10 (-3.50%)
Updated
Apr 9 closing price
Capitalization
4.01B
CMBNF
Price
$91.31
Change
+$25.31 (+38.35%)
Updated
Dec 2 closing price
Capitalization
2.23B
Ad is loading...

BWAGF vs CMBNF

Header iconBWAGF vs CMBNF Comparison
Open Charts BWAGF vs CMBNFBanner chart's image
BAWAG Group AG
Price$85.52
Change-$3.10 (-3.50%)
Volume$301
Capitalization4.01B
CEMBRA MONEY BK AG
Price$91.31
Change+$25.31 (+38.35%)
Volume$170
Capitalization2.23B
BWAGF vs CMBNF Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BWAGF vs. CMBNF commentary
Apr 20, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BWAGF is a Hold and CMBNF is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 20, 2025
Stock price -- (BWAGF: $85.52 vs. CMBNF: $91.31)
Brand notoriety: BWAGF and CMBNF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BWAGF: 44% vs. CMBNF: 100%
Market capitalization -- BWAGF: $4.01B vs. CMBNF: $2.23B
BWAGF [@Regional Banks] is valued at $4.01B. CMBNF’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $2.23B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $5.96B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BWAGF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileCMBNF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BWAGF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • CMBNF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, BWAGF is a better buy in the long-term than CMBNF.

Price Growth

BWAGF (@Regional Banks) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while CMBNF (@Regional Banks) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +3.11%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.66%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1.78%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+3.11% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BWAGF($4.01B) has a higher market cap than CMBNF($2.23B). CMBNF has higher P/E ratio than BWAGF: CMBNF (11.79) vs BWAGF (9.37). BWAGF YTD gains are higher at: 0.258 vs. CMBNF (0.000). CMBNF has less debt than BWAGF: CMBNF (3.1B) vs BWAGF (10.4B). BWAGF has higher revenues than CMBNF: BWAGF (1.38B) vs CMBNF (512M).
BWAGFCMBNFBWAGF / CMBNF
Capitalization4.01B2.23B180%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD0.2580.000-
P/E Ratio9.3711.7979%
Revenue1.38B512M270%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt10.4B3.1B335%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BWAGF: Fundamental Ratings
BWAGF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
76
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
20
SMR RATING
1..100
10
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
54
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
38
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GME26.780.53
+2.02%
GameStop Corp
AAPL196.982.71
+1.39%
Apple
BTC.X85063.414000612.609400
+0.73%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
SPY525.66N/A
N/A
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF
TSLA241.37-0.18
-0.07%
Tesla

BWAGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BWAGF has been loosely correlated with CMBNF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 35% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BWAGF jumps, then CMBNF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BWAGF
1D Price
Change %
BWAGF100%
N/A
CMBNF - BWAGF
35%
Loosely correlated
N/A
TVLF - BWAGF
32%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BLMIF - BWAGF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CRZBF - BWAGF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MTFC - BWAGF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

CMBNF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CMBNF has been loosely correlated with BLMIF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CMBNF jumps, then BLMIF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CMBNF
1D Price
Change %
CMBNF100%
N/A
BLMIF - CMBNF
64%
Loosely correlated
N/A
BWAGF - CMBNF
35%
Loosely correlated
N/A
BORT - CMBNF
28%
Poorly correlated
+1.54%
NCXS - CMBNF
28%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BAP - CMBNF
22%
Poorly correlated
-0.03%
More